Project Tenants Sample Clauses

Project Tenants. Subject to the Project Operating Procedures, as described in Section 10 herein, and also subject to the advice and consent of the City, and of the advice of the Project Advisory Board, UCFRF will establish a program as part of the Project whereby qualified Project Clients can sublet specified space within the Project Office for use as customary commercial business space (“the Project Tenants”). The terms of the sublet program shall be established by the Project Operating Procedures.

Project Tenants. Pursuant to Section 3.b of the Original FM Extension Agreement, certain aspects of Section 501.1 of the Original DDA were amended including, but not limited to, the following: (i) the premises in the Project located outside of the Market Hall were defined as the “Non-Market Hall Premises”; and (ii) the “Non-Market Hall Standard” was established for tenants and occupants of the Non-Market Hall Premises, unless otherwise approved by the Successor Agency, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. In light of the fact that the Project is no longer intended to include a Market Hall, all premises within the Project shall be deemed to be Non-Market Hall Premises, and the provisions of Section 3.b of the Original FM Extension Agreement shall otherwise remain applicable to the Project and shall establish the standard for the quality of tenants and occupants of the Project. Additionally, in light of the fact that the Project is no longer intended to include a Market Hall, Sections 501.1(a), (b), and (d) of the Original DDA are hereby deleted in their entirety, provided that the procedure for the Successor Agency to approve or disapprove of “Qualifying Tenants” for the Project set forth in Section 501.1(a)(iii) of the Original DDA shall be incorporated herein by this reference and shall be applicable to the Successor Agency’s approval or disapproval of proposed tenants or occupants of the Project as meeting or not meeting the Non-Market Hall Standard. Section 501.1(e) of the Original DDA shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following; “The Successor Agency shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the use and operation of the Project, including, without limitation, as a result of the requirements set forth in this Section 501.1 or otherwise, including, without limitation, any payments to any Project tenant or occupant for lease termination, including, without limitation, any payment for lost rent, replacement tenant improvements allowances, broker fees, or any other similar amounts.”

Project Tenants. The Project, within pads P3-P9 and/or shops A-B, must include at least four (4) Quality Restaurants. At least two (2) of the four (4) must be full service restaurants that provide lunch and dinner, and no more than one (1) of the four (4) may generate a majority of its revenue through breakfast sales. Quality Restaurants offer a unique/boutique culinary destination experience contributing to the activation of the Placemaking Amenities and public spaces. The following are examples of “Quality Restaurants” that offer a culinary destination experience: The Vig, OHSO Brewery, Chop Shop, Obon Sushi, Prep & Pastry, Snooze, Scramble, La ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Café, Farm and Craft, Luci’s, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇, Pomo Pizzeria, ▇▇▇’s Kitchen, Postino’s, Sorso Wine Room, The ▇▇▇▇▇▇ House, North, Becket’s Table, Southern Rail, Grassroots, Twisted Grove, Tap House Kitchen, SumoMayo, Hop Social Tavern, Stock & Stable, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Brewing Company, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Brewing Company, ▇▇▇▇ Brewing, Four Peaks Brewing Company, Yard House, ▇▇▇▇ Italian, Otro Café, Hatter and Hare, The Main Ingredient, Tuck Shop, The Mission, AZ/88, Hula’s, Culinary Dropout, The Living Room, Brio, Sip Coffee & Beerhouse, Ahi Poke, Barrio Café, Costa Vida, Short Leash, Sushiholic, The Mexicano, Sicilian Butcher, Chula Seafood. The Parties understand that this list of examples is not exhaustive and that there are other restaurants that would qualify as Quality Restaurants that offer a culinary destination experience. The Parties agree to work in good faith to evaluate other restaurants proposed for the Project that are not included in the list of examples, yet believed by Owner to qualify as Quality Restaurants that offer a culinary destination experience. Proof that Owner has provided a Quality Restaurant as described in this Paragraph 3 shall be demonstrated by a certificate of occupancy issued by the City and a proof of lease with the Quality Restaurant as demonstrated by either a recorded memorandum of lease or other proof of an executed lease as approved by the City Attorney’s office.

Project Tenants. Developer will ensure that the Project is initially developed and leased to include three (3) “Quality Restaurants” as more fully described below, one (1) of which is anticipated to be Postinos and the remaining two (2) must be full service Quality Restaurants.