Proof of Proposition Sample Clauses

Proof of Proposition. 18 In this section we give an algorithm to prove the following proposition.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proof of Proposition. 4. The first part follows directly from the subgame Γ1,G (see payoffs given in figure 1). After loosing to G1, brand would launch a generic if ΠT1 + ΠT1 − θ + δ(ΠT1 + ΠT1) ≥ 0 0 ΠD0 +δΠT0. Rearranging the terms gives the required result θ ≤ (ΠT1 +ΠT0 −ΠD0)+δ·(ΠT1 +ΠT1 − 0 ΠT0) = θ∗∗(κ). Similarly, the second part follows from the subgame Γ1,B. After winning against 0 G1, the brand launches a generic in post-patent period if ΠM + δ(ΠT1 + ΠT1 − θ) ≥ ΠM + δ(ΠT0). Rearranging gives the required result θ ≤ (ΠT1 + ΠT1 − ΠT0) = θ∗(κ). Q Appendix C. Extension to the Game Tree‌ j 0 2
Sample 1Sample 2
Proof of Proposition. 7 The first and second order derivatives of Jr with respect to Cr are ∂Jr ∂Cr ∂2Jr = λ − λpFR (Cr − Gr) − πe (1 − FR(Cr)) (E.1) ∂C2 = −λpfR (Cr − Gr) + πefR(Cr) (E.2) r
Sample 1
Proof of Proposition. 2. Substituting the instrument values into the welfare function, we can evaluate the critical discount factor δt2: δt2 = WDt WCt f − = f f WDt − WNt Ξ1(n, γ)2Ξ2(n, γ) BNt (n)Ξ3(n, γ)Ξ4(n, γ) where Ξ1(n, γ) = αΞ1 (γ) + αΞ1 (γ)n + αΞ1 (γ)n2 with αΞ1 (γ) = 2(36 − 72γ + 59γ2 − 26γ3 + 6γ4) αΞ1 (γ) = γ(60 − 98γ + 65γ2 − 18γ3) αΞ1 (γ) = γ2(3 − 2γ)(4 − 3γ) Ξ2(n, γ) = αΞ2 (γ) + αΞ2 (γ)n + αΞ2 (γ)n2 + αΞ2 (γ)n3 with 1 αΞ2 (γ) = Γ(0)(64 − 96γ + 48γ2 − 8γ3 + 2γ4 − 3γ5) αΞ2 (γ) = γ(128 − 192γ + 96γ2 − 24γ3 + 20γ4 − 9γ5) αΞ2 (γ) = γ2(32 − 32γ + 12γ2 − 16γ3 + 9γ4) αΞ2 (γ) = γ5(4 − 3γ) Ξ3(n, γ) = αΞ3 (γ) + αΞ3 (γ)n + αΞ3 (γ)n2 + αΞ3 (γ)n3 with αΞ3 (γ) = 2Γ(0)(48 − 88γ + 54γ2 − 9γ3 − 2γ4) αΞ3 (γ) = γ(192 − 328γ + 172γ2 − 4γ3 − 13γ4) αΞ3 (γ) = 2γ2(2 + γ)(3 − 2γ)(4 − 3γ) αΞ3 (γ) = γ4(4 − 3γ) and Ξ4(n, γ) = αΞ4 (γ) + αΞ4 (γ)n + αΞ4 (γ)n2 + αΞ4 (γ)n3 with αΞ4 (γ) = 2Γ(0)(96 − 272γ + 326γ2 − 213γ3 + 78γ4 − 12γ5) αΞ4 (γ) = γ(576 − 1656γ + 2012γ2 − 1300γ3 + 439γ4 − 60γ5) αΞ4 (γ) = 2γ2(144 − 350γ + 337γ2 − 148γ3 + 24γ4) αΞ4 (γ) = γ3(4 − 3γ)(12 − 15γ + 4γ2) Similarly, we can express WDs − WCs B f (n)2Ψ1(n, γ) δsf = f = f f WDs − WNf N Ψ2(n, γ) where Ψ1(n, γ) = αΨ1 (γ) + αΨ1 (γ)n + αΨ1 (γ)n2 + αΨ1 (γ)n3 with 0 920γ4 − 1500γ5 + 486γ6 − 75γ7) 1 488γ4 − 4772γ5 + 1440γ6 − 195γ7 2 12γ4 − 21γ5) αΨ1 (γ) = Γ(0)(640 − 2240γ + 3712γ2 − 3936γ3 + 2 αΨ1 (γ) = γ(1536 − 6080γ + 11136γ2 − 12544γ3 + 9 ) αΨ1 (γ) = 8γ2(1 − γ)(72 − 224γ + 314γ2 − 252γ3 + 1 3 αΨ1 (γ) = 16γ3(1 − γ)4(4 − 3γ) and Ψ2(n, γ) = αΨ2 (γ)+αΨ2 (γ)n+αΨ2 (γ)n2+αΨ2 (γ)n3+αΨ2 (γ)n4+αΨ2 (γ)n5+αΨ2 (γ)n6+ αΨ2 (γ)n7 with αΨ2 (γ) = 4Γ(0)3(35328 − 216320γ + 619648γ2 − 1099712γ3 + 1351200γ4 − 1215472γ5 + 823136γ6 − 422760γ7 + 162306γ8 − 44499γ9 + 7848γ10 − 675γ11) αΨ2 (γ) = 4γΓ(0)2(214016 − 1338624γ + 3897600γ2 − 7007296γ3 + 8694080γ4 − 7867696γ5 + 5333968γ6 − 2724272γ7 + 1030752γ8 − 275313γ9 + 46629γ10 − 3780γ11) αΨ2 (γ) = γ2Γ(0)(2166784 − 13846528γ + 41058816γ2 − 74952448γ3 + 94113152γ4 − 85835584γ5 + 58323648γ6 − 29631712γ7 + 11045456γ8 − 2873016γ9 + 467586γ10 − 35883γ11) αΨ2 (γ) = γ3(2949120 − 19290112γ + 58413056γ2 − 108592896γ3 + 138375168γ4 − 127473216γ5 + 86926912γ6 − 43953856γ7 + 16141904γ8 − 4089648γ9 + 640548γ10 − 46737γ11) αΨ2 (γ) = γ4(1152000 − 7170048γ + 20475648γ2 − 35512576γ3 + 41630528γ4 − 34601856γ5 + 20694304γ6 − 8792064γ7 + 2533320γ8 − 445176γ9 + 36045γ10) αΨ2 (γ) = γ5(4 − 3γ)(63232 − 330240γ + 775168γ2 − 1075904γ3 + 970672γ4 − 583872γ5 + 228220γ6 − 52740γ7 + 5481γ8) αΨ2 (γ) = 8γ6(1 − γ)(4 − 3γ)2(216 − 728γ + 1050γ2 − 812...
Sample 1

Related to Proof of Proposition

  • Proof of Compliance Contractor shall provide the Board with all of the following: 1) proof that a valid occupancy permit for school usage has been obtained; 2) proof that an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Management Plan has been completed, 3) Contracted Program Annual Budget for 2020-2021, 4) Program Annual Budget Expenditures Report for 2019-2020, if Contractor was under contract with MPS during that period, 5) proof of all insurance required under this Contract, 6) Contractor’s 2020-2021 calendar for the Educational Program, and 7) all other items required and set forth in the Contract Compliance Checklist attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Appendix K.

  • Proof of Sickness Sick leave with pay is only payable because of sickness or injury and employees who are absent from duty because of sickness may be required by the Employer to prove sickness. Failure to meet this requirement can be cause for disciplinary action. Repeated failure to meet this requirement can lead to dismissal. A doctor’s certificate may be requested for each leave of more than three (3) consecutive work days.

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • Investigatory Meetings A. An employee required to attend an investigatory meeting shall receive advance notice of such meeting. Such notice shall include:

  • PROOF OF LICENSE The Contractor must provide to each Licensee who places a Purchase Order either: (i) the Product developer’s certified License Confirmation Certificates in the name of such Licensee; or (ii) a written confirmation from the Proprietary owner accepting Product invoice as proof of license. Contractor shall submit a sample certificate, or alternatively such written confirmation from the proprietary developer. Such certificates must be in a form acceptable to the Licensee.

  • Deemed Compliance with Proposition 65 The Parties agree that compliance by Xxxxxxxx with this Settlement Agreement constitutes compliance with Proposition 65 with respect to exposure to DEHP from use of the Products.

  • Proof of Loss For Covered Services provided by Contracting Providers, Preferred and Participating Dentists, Contracting Vision Providers, and Contracting Pharmacies, Members are not required to submit claims in order to obtain benefits. For Covered Services provided by Non-Contracting Providers, Non-Participating Dentists, Non-Contracting Vision Providers, and Non-Contracting Pharmacies, Members must furnish written proof of loss, or have the provider submit proof of loss, to CareFirst BlueChoice within one (1) year after the date of the loss. The Member is also responsible for providing information requested by CareFirst BlueChoice including, but not limited to, medical records. Failure to furnish proof within the time required shall not invalidate or reduce any claim if it was not reasonably possible to give proof within the required time, provided proof is furnished as soon as reasonably possible and in no event, except in the absence of legal capacity, later than one (1) year from the time proof is otherwise required. CareFirst BlueChoice will honor claims submitted for Covered Services, Covered Dental Services, or Covered Vision Services by any agency of the federal, state, or local government that has the statutory authority to submit claims beyond the time limits established under this In-Network Agreement. These claims must be submitted to CareFirst BlueChoice before the filing deadline established by the applicable statute on claims forms that provide all of the information CareFirst BlueChoice deems necessary to process the claims. CareFirst BlueChoice provides forms for this purpose.

  • Final Approval After Acceptance, Engineer shall perform any required modifications, changes, alterations, corrections, redesigns, and additional work necessary to receive Final Approval by the County. "Final Approval" in this sense shall mean formal recognition that the Engineering Services have been fully carried out.

  • Proof of Illness A Board may request medical confirmation of illness or injury and any restrictions or limitations any Employee may have, confirming the dates of absence and the reason thereof (omitting a diagnosis). Medical confirmation is required to be provided by the Employee for absences of five (5) consecutive working days or longer. The medical confirmation may be required to be provided on a form prescribed by the Board. Where an Employee does not provide medical confirmation as requested, or otherwise declines to participate and/or cooperate in the administration of the Sick Leave Benefit Plan, access to compensation may be suspended or denied. Before access to compensation is denied, discussion will occur between the Union and the school board. Compensation will not be denied for the sole reason that the medical practitioner refuses to provide the required medical information. A school Board may require an independent medical examination to be completed by a medical practitioner qualified in respect of the illness or injury of the Board’s choice at the Board’s expense. In cases where the Employee’s failure to cooperate is the result of a medical condition, the Board shall consider those extenuating circumstances in arriving at a decision.

  • Order of proposals (2) Each of the proposals pursuant to subclause (1) may, with the approval of the Minister or if so required by him, be submitted separately and in any order as to the matter or matters mentioned in one or more of paragraphs (a) to (k) of subclause (1).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!