Common use of Property and Casualty Insurance Clause in Contracts

Property and Casualty Insurance. Parent and the Subsidiaries maintain property and commercial general liability insurance in such amounts and covering such risks as Parent and the Subsidiaries reasonably consider adequate for the conduct of Parent and each Subsidiary’s businesses and the value of Parent’s and each Subsidiary’s properties and as is customary for publicly held companies engaged in similar businesses in similar industries, all of which property and casualty insurance is in full force and effect, except where the failure to maintain such property and casualty insurance would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. There are no material claims by Parent or any Subsidiary under any such insurance policy or instrument as to which any insurance company is denying liability or defending under a reservation of rights clause. Parent has no reason to believe that Parent and each Subsidiary will not be able to renew their respective existing property and casualty insurance as and when such coverage expires or will be able to obtain replacement property and commercial general liability insurance adequate for the conduct of the business and the value of its properties at a cost that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither Parent nor any Subsidiary has received notice from any insurer or agent of such insurer that substantial capital improvements or other expenditures will have to be made in order to continue such property and casualty insurance.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.), Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.), Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Property and Casualty Insurance. Parent and the Subsidiaries maintain property and commercial general liability casualty insurance in such amounts and covering such risks as Parent and the Subsidiaries reasonably consider adequate for the conduct of Parent and each Subsidiary’s businesses and the value of Parent’s and each Subsidiary’s properties and as is customary for publicly held companies engaged in similar businesses in similar industries, all of which property and casualty insurance is in full force and effect, except where the failure to maintain such property and casualty insurance would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. There are no material claims by Parent or any Subsidiary under any such insurance policy or instrument as to which any insurance company is denying liability or defending under a reservation of rights clause. Parent has no reason to believe that Parent and each Subsidiary will not be able to renew their respective existing property and casualty insurance as and when such coverage expires or will be able to obtain replacement property and commercial general liability casualty insurance adequate for the conduct of the business and the value of its properties at a cost that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither Parent nor any Subsidiary has received notice from any insurer or agent of such insurer that substantial capital improvements or other expenditures will have to be made in order to continue such property and casualty insurance.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.), Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.), Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Property and Casualty Insurance. Parent and the Subsidiaries maintain property and commercial general liability casualty insurance in such amounts and covering such risks as Parent and the Subsidiaries reasonably consider adequate for the conduct of Parent Parent’s and each Subsidiary’s businesses and the value of Parent’s and each Subsidiary’s properties and as is customary for publicly held companies engaged in similar businesses in similar industries, all of which property and casualty insurance is in full force and effect, except where the failure to maintain such property and casualty insurance would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. There are no material claims by Parent or any Subsidiary under any such insurance policy or instrument as to which any insurance company is denying liability or defending under a reservation of rights clause. Parent has no reason to believe that Parent and each Subsidiary will not be able to renew their respective existing property and casualty insurance as and when such coverage expires or will be able to obtain replacement property and commercial general liability casualty insurance adequate for the conduct of the business and the value of its properties at a cost that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither Parent nor any Subsidiary has received notice from any insurer or agent of such insurer that substantial capital improvements or other expenditures will have to be made in order to continue such property and casualty insurance.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.), Underwriting Agreement (T-Mobile US, Inc.)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!