Proposed Two-Groups Models Sample Clauses

Proposed Two-Groups Models. Many approaches have been proposed for locfdr estimation by fitting the two-groups model. These include fully parametric, nonparametric, Bayesian and empirical Bayes, and semi-parametric approaches. With any of these approaches, fitting the model requires knowledge of p0, f0(z), and of either f1(z) or f (z). The marginal distribution of all zj’s, f (z), is estimated using the data for all the proteins in the experiment. The sub-density f0(z) is typically estimated using only the central part of the distribution of zj’s in the neighborhood of the zero point. The rationale being that this central part consists mainly of null proteins. In microarray gene expression analyses; Xxxxxxx et al., (2002)[3] estimates f (z) by fitting a mixture of beta distributions, when the two-group model is specified using p-values. Xxxxx (2002)[37] estimates f (z) by maximum likelihood estimates of high-order polynomials and natural spline basis with 7 degrees of freedom. In Xxxxxxx et al., (2002)[3], the distribution of the null genes, f0(z), is simply the beta(1,1) component of the mixture of beta distributions, since under the null hypothesis for a well defined test statistic; the p-values follow a uniform distribution on [0,1], which is equivalent to a beta(1,1). Xxxxx (2002)[37] estimates f0(z) using an empirical null distribution using both central matching and maximum likelihood estimates, where the estimation is done using a fixed-sized window around the peak corresponding to the 0 point of the empirical distribution of the zj’s. Pan et al., (2003)[94] used a normal mixture model with the number of mixture components estimated by a likelihood ratio test based procedure for the estimation of both f (z) and f0(z). We propose to investigate the performance of several distributional choices for both f0(z) and f (z), including normal, skew-normal (sN) and skew-t (sT), and finite mixtures of them. Finite mixtures of distributions have found wide recognition in modeling heterogeneous data and as approximations to complicated probability den- sities, presenting multimodality, skewness and heavy tails. Comprehensive surveys of the application of mixture models are available in B¨xxxxxx (2000) [21], McLachlan and Peel (2000) [86], and from a Bayesian perspective, in Fru¨hwirth-Xxxxxxxxx (2006) [47]. Furthermore, we propose to investigate the utility of the Generalized Hyperbolic (GH) distribution, as a means of dealing with the excess kurtosis that is sometimes observed in the cen...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Proposed Two-Groups Models

  • Dimensions Education Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science, Information Systems, or a related field. Or equivalent work experience. Experience: A minimum of 3 years of IT work experience in production and operations support.

  • Training a. The employer, in consultation with the local, shall be responsible for developing and implementing an ongoing harassment and sexual harassment awareness program for all employees. Where a program currently exists and meets the criteria listed in this agreement, such a program shall be deemed to satisfy the provisions of this article. This awareness program shall initially be for all employees and shall be scheduled at least once annually for all new employees to attend.

  • Complexity Intermediate professional level role. Provides data warehouse architectural design, development and support in multi-platform environments. Works on multiple projects as a team member and may lead projects of moderate complexity. May coach more junior technical staff.

  • MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 3.01 The Union acknowledges that all management rights and prerogatives are vested exclusively with the Employer and without limiting the generality of the foregoing; it is the exclusive function of the Employer:

  • HOURS OF WORK i) Where employees are now working a longer daily tour, the provisions set out in this Article governing the regular hours of work on a daily tour shall be adjusted accordingly.

  • Personnel Files ‌ An employee, or his/her certified representative with the written consent of the employee, may inspect that employee's personnel file with the exception of all material obtained from other employers and agencies at the time that employee was hired. An employee shall be advised of, and entitled to read, any written statement by the employee's supervisor or departmental Management regarding his/her work performance or conduct if such statement is to be placed in his/her personnel file. The employee shall acknowledge that he/she has read such material by affixing his/her signature on the copy to be filed, with the understanding that such signature merely signifies that he/she has read the material to be filed but does not necessarily indicate agreement with its content. If the employee refuses to sign, the supervisor shall note his/her refusal on the copy to be filed along with the supervisor's signature and the signature of a witness to the employee's refusal to sign. The employee may file a grievance regarding any such document within the prescribed time limits of the grievance procedure. If the employee fails to file a grievance within the designated time limits, the document becomes part of the official file. If the employee does file a grievance within the designated time limits, said document shall not be placed in the official file nor referenced in any Performance Evaluation or Appraisal of Promotability until the grievance procedure or civil service appeal rights have been exhausted. Grievances filed under this provision shall not be subject to the Arbitration provisions of the Grievance Procedure unless they involve violation of a specific provision of this agreement. Management agrees that no properly used full paid sick leave used in the twelve months immediately prior to an Appraisal of Promotability or a Performance Evaluation will be referenced on such forms. The employee may attach his/her statement to any document within twenty (20) business days if he/she chooses not to file a grievance regarding such document or within ten (10) business days following final determination if he/she has filed a grievance regarding such document. On reviewing his/her personnel file, an employee may request and have any written warnings issued more than one year prior placed in an envelope and sealed in his/her personnel file except as such may be a part of an official permanent record. On the face of the sealed envelope it shall read "The contents herein shall be disclosed only upon written consent of the subject employee or by subpoena or other legal process from a public body of competent jurisdiction." The date the contents of the sealed envelope will be destroyed shall also appear on the face of envelope. That date shall be two (2) years from the date of issue of the documents in the sealed envelope. An employee on reviewing his/her personnel file, may request and have any written warnings or reprimand(s) issued more than two (2) years prior removed from his/her personnel file except as such may be a part of an official permanent record. All departments employing peace officers covered by the Peace Officers Bill of Rights shall comply with its provisions.

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7.01 For purposes of this Agreement, a grievance is defined as a difference arising between the parties relating to the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the Agreement including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

  • Scope of Services The specific scope of work for each job shall be determined in advance and in writing between TIPS Member, Member’s design professionals and Vendor. It is permitted for the TIPS Member to provide a general scope description, but the awarded vendor should provide a written scope of work, and if applicable, according to the TIPS Member’s design Professional as part of the proposal. Once the scope of the job is agreed to, the TIPS Member will issue a PO and/or an Agreement or Contract with the Job Order Contract Proposal referenced or as an attachment along with bond and any other special provisions agreed by the TIPS Member. If special terms and conditions other than those covered within this solicitation and awarded Agreements are required, they will be attached to the PO and/or an Agreement or Contract and shall take precedence over those in this base TIPS Vendor Agreement.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Exclusions The Warrant Agent shall have no responsibility with respect to the validity of this Agreement or with respect to the validity or execution of any Warrant (except its countersignature thereof). The Warrant Agent shall not be responsible for any breach by the Company of any covenant or condition contained in this Agreement or in any Warrant. The Warrant Agent shall not be responsible to make any adjustments required under the provisions of Section 4 hereof or responsible for the manner, method, or amount of any such adjustment or the ascertaining of the existence of facts that would require any such adjustment; nor shall it by any act hereunder be deemed to make any representation or warranty as to the authorization or reservation of any shares of Common Stock to be issued pursuant to this Agreement or any Warrant or as to whether any shares of Common Stock shall, when issued, be valid and fully paid and non-assessable.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!