PTR Make-up Gas Balancing Sample Clauses

PTR Make-up Gas Balancing. COPANO shall use reasonable commercial efforts each month to deliver PTR Make-up Gas due KMTP in the same month as such Gas was delivered to the Plant. The number of MMBtu delivered by COPANO as PTR Make-up Gas may not equal to amount due from time to time, and COPANO shall maintain an account of the over-and under-deliveries of PTR Make-up Gas. Any imbalance in deliveries of PTR Make-up Gas shall be cashed out each month in accordance with the following: * (a) Over-delivery of PTR Make-up Gas shall be sold to KMTP at a price equal to [REDACTED] for: (i) the month in which the Gas was processed which gave rise to the PTR Make-up Gas obligation, and (ii) the following month. * (b) Under-delivery of PTR Make-up Gas shall be purchased from KMTP by COPANO at a price equal to [REDACTED] for: (i) the month in which the Gas was processed which gave rise to the PTR Make-up Gas obligation, and (ii) the following month.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PTR Make-up Gas Balancing. COPANO shall use reasonable commercial efforts each month to deliver PTR Make-up Gas due KMTP in the same month as such Gas was delivered to the Plant. The number of MMBtu delivered by COPANO as PTR Make-up Gas may not equal to amount due from time to time, and COPANO shall maintain an account of the over-and under-deliveries of PTR Make-up Gas. Any imbalance in deliveries of PTR Make-up Gas shall be cashed out each month in accordance with the following: * (a) Over-delivery of PTR Make-up Gas shall be sold to KMTP at a price equal to [REDACTED]. * (b) Under-delivery of PTR Make-up Gas shall be purchased from KMTP by COPANO at a price equal to [REDACTED].

Related to PTR Make-up Gas Balancing

  • Imbalances The parties hereto recognize that with respect to Section 2.01, on any Day, receipts of gas by Union and deliveries of gas by Union may not always be exactly equal, but each party shall cooperate with the other in order to balance as nearly as possible the quantities transacted on a daily basis, and any imbalances arising shall be allocated to the Facilitating Agreements and shall be subject to the respective terms and charges contained therein, and shall be resolved in a timely manner.

  • Gas Imbalances As of the Closing Date, except as set forth on Schedule 7.24 or on the most recent certificate delivered pursuant to Section 8.07(c), on a net basis there are no gas imbalances, take or pay or other prepayments with respect to any of the Obligors’ Oil and Gas Properties which would require any such Obligors to deliver, in the aggregate, five percent (5%) or more of the monthly production of Hydrocarbons produced from their Oil and Gas Properties at some future time without then or thereafter receiving fall payment therefor.

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2022-23, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2024-25 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2024, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

  • Price Adjustments for OGS Centralized Contracts Periodic price adjustments will occur no more than twice per year on a schedule to be established solely by OGS. Pricing offered shall be fixed for the first twelve (12) months of the Contract term. Such price increases will only apply to the OGS Centralized Contracts and shall not be applied retroactively to Authorized User Agreements or any Mini-bids already submitted to an Authorized User. Price decreases may be made at any time. Additionally, some price decreases shall be calculated in accordance with Appendix B, section 17, Pricing.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Terms and Conditions have been renumbered as depicted in the following chart: Current Amended Section Title 4.25 4.26 Severability 4.26 4.27 Entire Agreement

  • Interconnection Customer Payments Not Taxable The Parties intend that all payments or property transfers made by the Interconnection Customer to the Participating TO for the installation of the Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities and the Network Upgrades shall be non-taxable, either as contributions to capital, or as a refundable advance, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable state income tax laws and shall not be taxable as contributions in aid of construction or otherwise under the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable state income tax laws.

  • Balancing Full load hours for combined assignments other than those specified above shall be determined by the following formula: Hours of assignment, Type 1 + Hours of assignment, Type 2 + Hours of assignment, Type 3 = 1 Full load for assignment Full load for assignment Full load for assignment Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Underload shall be balanced within the following three (3) regular semesters if possible. The faculty member may, at the member’s option, use load from summer sessions to balance an underload. To balance the underload, a unit member may be assigned to no more than two colleges, unless the unit member agrees to other arrangements. The maximum required assignment shall be 1.25 FTE per semester until the underload is eliminated.

  • Compensating Balance Arrangement The Funds and The Bank of New York have entered into a compensating balance arrangement, which would allow the Funds to compensate the Bank for any overdrafts by maintaining a positive cash balance the next day. Conversely, on any day the Funds maintain a positive balance, they will be allowed to overdraw the account as compensation. In both cases, Federal Reserve requirements, currently 10%, will be assessed. Therefore, all overdrafts must be compensated at 100% of the total and all positive balances will allow for an overdraft of 90% of the total. Balances for the tax-exempt portfolios will be permitted an open-ended roll forward. The taxable portfolios are closed out on a quarterly basis with no carry-over to the subsequent quarter. At the end of each quarter, the average overdraft will be assessed a fee of 1% above the actual Federal Funds rate at the end of the period. Any average positive balance will receive an earnings credit computed at the daily effective 90 day T-bill rate minus 0.25 bps on the last day of the period. Earnings credits will be offset against the Funds’ safekeeping fees. GLOBAL CUSTODY (Non-US Securities Processing) Global Safekeeping Fee Transaction Fee Countries *(in basis points)1 (U.S. Dollars)2 Argentina 17.00 55 Australia 1.50 25 Austria 3.00 40 Bahrain 50.00 140 Bangladesh 50.00 145 Belgium 2.50 35 Bermuda 17.00 70 Botswana 50.00 140 Brazil 12.00 30 Bulgaria 30.00 85 Canada 1.00 10 Chile 20.00 80 China “A” Shares 15.00 80 China “B” Shares 15.00 60 Colombia 50.00 95 Costa Rica 14.00 65 Croatia 25.00 70 Cyprus 15.00 35 Czech Republic 18.00 50 Denmark 2.00 35 Ecuador 30.00 55 Egypt 30.00 85 Estonia 10.00 60 Euromarket/Euroclear3 1.00 10 Euromarket/Clearstream 1.00 10 Finland 3.50 35 France 2.00 30 Germany 1.50 25 Ghana 50.00 140 Greece 9.00 40 Hong Kong 3.00 45 Hungary 20.00 55 Iceland 11.00 35 India 13.00 105 Indonesia 11.00 80 Ireland (Equities) 3.00 33 Ireland (Gov’t Bonds) 1.00 13 Israel 20.00 40 Italy 1.50 35 Ivory Coast 50.00 140 Jamaica 50.00 60 Japan 1.75 20 Jordan 50.00 140 Kazakhstan 53.00 140 Kenya 48.00 140 Latvia 50.00 45 Lebanon 50.00 140 Lithuania 20.00 43 Luxembourg 10.00 80 Malaysia 4.50 45 Malta 20.00 63 Mauritius 25.00 100 Mexico 6.50 30 Morocco 50.00 95 Namibia 50.00 60 Netherlands 2.00 25 New Zealand 2.00 35 Nigeria 50.00 60 Norway 2.50 35 Oman 50.00 140 Pakistan 50.00 140 Peru 50.00 83 Philippines 6.00 60 Poland 15.00 63 Portugal 5.00 50 Qatar 50.00 140 Romania 30.00 80 Russia Equities 40.00 95 Singapore 3.50 45 Slovak Republic 23.00 95 Slovenia 50.00 60 South Africa 2.50 30 South Korea 6.50 45 Spain 2.50 40 Sri Lanka 13.00 70 Swaziland 50.00 60 Sweden 2.00 30 Switzerland 2.00 35 Taiwan 10.00 60 Thailand 5.00 50 Trinidad & Tobago 50.00 53 Tunisia 50.00 53 Turkey 12.50 60 Ukraine 75.00 250 United Kingdom 0.50 10 Uruguay 75.00 83 Venezuela 50.00 140 Zambia 50.00 140 Zimbabwe 50.00 140 Not In Bank/Not in Custody Assets USA4………………………$500 per line per annum $70 per non-USD currency movement Brazil - 15 basis points for annual administrative charges Colombia - USD $600 per month minimum administration charge Ecuador - USD $800 monthly minimum per relationship Egypt - USD $400 monthly minimum per relationship Local taxes, stamp duties or other assessments, including stock exchange fees, postage and insurance for shipping, facsimile reporting, extraordinary telecommunications fees or other unusual expenses, which are unique to a country in which the Funds are investing This Amendment (the “Amendment”) dated as of November 8, 2007 between The Bank of New York (“Custodian”) and the Funds listed on Schedule II to the Custody Agreement, as amended by Exhibit A attached hereto (each a “Fund”).

  • Unbundled Sub-Loop Distribution Voice Grade (USLD-VG) is a copper sub- loop facility from the cross-box in the field up to and including the point of demarcation at the End User’s premises and may have load coils.

  • Interconnection Customer Compensation If the CAISO requests or directs the Interconnection Customer to provide a service pursuant to Articles 9.6.3 (Payment for Reactive Power) or 13.5.1 of this LGIA, the CAISO shall compensate the Interconnection Customer in accordance with the CAISO Tariff.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!