Common use of Public Benefit Clause in Contracts

Public Benefit. It is XR's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Praeger under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRPraeger's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP cadmium prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Praeger is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRZB's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ZB under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ZB that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRZB's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP mercury prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ZB is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.Agreement.‌‌

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇ 's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Tytan under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Tytan that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR▇▇▇▇▇ 's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Tytan is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRBellway's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Bellway under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Bellway that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRBellway's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Bellway is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇ 's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Nova under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Nova that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR▇▇▇▇ 's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Nova is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRQPC's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR QPC under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR QPC that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRQPC's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP cadmium prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR QPC is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇’▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR PYM under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR PYM that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's PYM’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products Product it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products Product addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR PYM is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRFPC's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR FPC under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR FPC that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRFPC's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR FPC is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRZB's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ZB under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ZB that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRZB's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP mercury prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ZB is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's CCA’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR CCA under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code titTit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR CCA that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's CCA’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR CCA is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR▇▇▇▇▇▇'s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇ is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XROrganifi's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Organifi under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Organifi that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XROrganifi's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Organifi is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRLKK's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR LKK under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR LKK that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRLKK's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR LKK is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's the Parties’ understanding that the commitments it Viition has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Viition under this Settlement Agreement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's alleged Viition’s or Releasees’ failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it Viition has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Viition is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Hodo is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's Japonesque’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Japonesque under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Japonesque that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's Japonesque’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP TiO2 prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Japonesque is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP TiO2 prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's Parties’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Noticing Party under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's Quick Cable’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Listed Chemical from Products it has manufactured, imported, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Noticing Party is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRPBD's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR PBD under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR PBD that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRPBD's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP TiO2 prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR PBD is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Promix under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Promix that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRPromix's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Promix is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's Parties’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR RM under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRRM's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR RM is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇▇ is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRISDIN's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ISDIN under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ISDIN that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRISDIN's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ISDIN is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇’s under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇’s that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of lead the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇’s is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRPerfect's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Perfect under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Perfect that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRPerfect's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP cadmium prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Perfect is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Suavecito under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Suavecito that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Suavecito is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇▇ is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Cerebelly under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Cerebelly that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Cerebelly is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRFFL's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR FFL under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR FFL that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRFFL's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR FFL is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's the Parties' understanding that the commitments it ▇▇▇▇▇▇ has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Colson is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Biedermann is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Luchi that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP cadmium prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Luchi is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's the Parties’ understanding that the commitments it Woodland has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Woodland under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRWoodland's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP Lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Woodland is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRCodeage's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Codeage under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Codeage that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRCodeage's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Codeage is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRCSC's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR CSC under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR CSC that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRCSC's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP THC prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR CSC is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRFSC's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR FSC under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR FSC that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRFSC's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR FSC is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRCapital's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Capital under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Capital that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRCapital's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP Listed Chemical prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Capital is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇▇ is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Reliance under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Reliance that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRReliance's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Reliance is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Happi under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Happi that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRHappi's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP THC prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Happi is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Kose under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Kose that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRKose's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Kose is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP Lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRSPAC's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR SPAC under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR SPAC that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRSPAC's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR SPAC is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRUBC's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR UBC under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR UBC that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRUBC's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR UBC is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRRifle's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Rifle under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Rifle that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRRifle's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Rifle is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's the Parties’ intent and understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Simple Symbol under this Settlement Agreement Agreement, confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's Simple Symbol’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreementthe Products, provided that XR Simple Symbol is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Craighill that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Craighill is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRInnovative's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Innovative under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Innovative that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRInnovative's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Innovative is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XRUCAN's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR UCAN under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRUCAN's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, imported, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR UCAN is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇ 's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Obagi under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Obagi that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR▇▇▇▇▇ 's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Obagi is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Altern under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Altern that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRAltern's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Altern is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Ogilvie is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR▇▇▇▇▇▇ 's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR Kencko under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR Kencko that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XRKencko 's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Kencko is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XR's the Parties’ understanding that the commitments it Enchante has agreed to herein, and the actions to be taken by XR Enchante under this Settlement Agreement Agreement, including payment of a civil penalty, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR that the Parties that, to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's alleged Enchante’s failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP DEA prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR Enchante is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.