Common use of Public Benefit Clause in Contracts

Public Benefit. It is Xxxxx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxWincrest’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Wincrest under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Wincrest that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Wincrest’s failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP acrylamide prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Wincrest is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxHarold’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Xxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Xxxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Xxxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP BPA prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Xxxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxSHANY’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge SHANY under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge SHANY that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge SHANY failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge SHANY is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxRiffe’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Xxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Xxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Xxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Xxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxCrest’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Crest under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Crest that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Crest failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Crest is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxUniek’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Uniek under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Uniek that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Uniek failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Uniek is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxOne Design’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge One Design under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge One Design that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge One Design failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge One Design is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxInvacare’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Invacare under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Invacare that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Invacare failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Invacare is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxREP’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge REP under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge REP that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge REP failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP DINP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge REP is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Xxxxx’s Xxxxx’x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Xxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Xxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Xxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Xxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Xxxxx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Achim under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Achim that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Achim failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Achim is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Xxxxx’s Xxxxxx’x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Xxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Surell that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Surell failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP CrVI prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Surell is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxXxxxxx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Xxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Xxxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Sylvan failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP DIDP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Sylvan is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxTrident’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Trident under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Trident that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Trident failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP DINP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Trident is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxMcure’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Mcure under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Mcure that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Mcure failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Mcure is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxXxx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Bon under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Bon that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Bon failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP CRVI prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Bon is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is XxxxxPaper Source’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Verge Paper Source under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Verge Paper Source that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Verge Paper Source failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Verge Paper Source is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.