Common use of Public Benefit Clause in Contracts

Public Benefit. It is Simplicity’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Simplicity’s failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Simplicity’s X. Xxxxx’x understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity X. Xxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity X. Xxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Simplicity’s X. Xxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity X. Xxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Simplicity’s Regular Visitors’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity Regular Visitors under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity Regular Visitors that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Simplicity’s Regular Visitors failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP DINP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity Regular Visitors is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is SimplicityReaction Retail’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity Reaction Retail under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity Reaction Retail that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to SimplicityReaction Retail’s failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP DINP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity Reaction Retail is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Simplicity’s the Parties’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity Consumer Value under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the Parties’ intent of Simplicity that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to SimplicityConsumer Value’s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP chromium (VI) prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity Consumer Value is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is Simplicity’s Xxxx’x’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity Xxxx’x under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity Xxxx’x that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to SimplicityMacy’s failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP DINP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity Macy’s is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is SimplicityReaction Retail’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity Reaction Retail under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity Reaction Retail that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to SimplicityReaction Retail’s failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity Reaction Retail is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.