Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this Amendment.
Appears in 6 contracts
Samples: Interconnection Agreement, Interconnection Agreement, Interconnection Agreement
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment agreement on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment agreement is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment agreement leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this Amendmentagreement.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Traffic Termination Agreement, Interconnection Agreement, Negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment Agreement on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment Agreement is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment Agreement leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment Agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this AmendmentAgreement.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Wireless Interconnection Agreement, Paging Interconnection Agreement, Interconnection Agreement
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this Amendment.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Interconnection Agreement
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment agreement is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this Amendment.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Interconnection Agreement