Qualitative Data Analysis Sample Clauses

Qualitative Data Analysis. The analysis is done using MaxQda 11. Key patterns and themes emerging from the transcripts were identified by memoing the data. In addition to this, inductive codes pertaining to the research question, identified during the literature review and the data collection were applied to the data to fully answer the research question. The 4 codes used are: • Knowledge: Any reference to the participant’s knowledge/information regarding the etiology and effects of undernutrition in their children. This also included the participants knowledge of signs/symptoms associated with malnutrition. Sources of such an information, for example, Anganwadi worker, Family, Self etc. was also include in this coding category. Participant’s knowledge of IYCF practices i.e. how / when / what needs to be done in their community were also included in this coding category such as “Do you know when to start introducing complementary foods to your child?” In accordance to the variety of responses in this coding category, it was sub-coded into: • Attitudes Any reference to how the participants feel about children’s nutrition and feeding. This could include a stance, belief, or mode of behaving. Also includes a settled manner of thinking, feeling or behaving which reflects their state of mind or disposition and has the potential to predict behavior. The category stands synonymous with the participant’s perspective, outlook, inclination, approach, temper or reactions. For example, “Do you feel you get enough information from the Anganwadi worker?” The discussion was facilitated using the photographs collected from the participants. This coding category is sub-coded into Opinions, Perceived Barriers and Perceived importance of nutrition recommendations depending on the participants’ views and description of the pictures.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook. Xxxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxx Xxxxx: Sage Publications. Xxxxxxxxx, X. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In X. X. Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, S. (Ed.), Social Representations.
Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods of Sourcebook. Singapore: Sage Publications Inc
Qualitative Data Analysis. The qualitative data from the key informant interviews did not merit systematic analysis due to lack of depth. This was not due to poor data collection but the nature of the domains. Nine of the 16 key informant interviews were utilized for the history and description of the program. They included six senior and junior staff persons, a leader within the local Ministry of Health, and two community leaders, one who had also been a community health volunteer. Only the domains of history, CSRA today, lessons learned and best practices were analyzed for this paper.
Qualitative Data Analysis. As is typical in qualitative research, data collection and data analysis happen simultaneously (Xxxxxxx, 2011). Analysis of the key informant interviews used a modified grounded theory approach. Grounded theory is considered a circular process in which researchers systematically revisit data and observations to create a framework for the processes or experiences (Xxxxxxx, 2011). In this case, we used emergent themes from the transcripts to describe the attitudes and perspectives presented about barriers to accessing abortion and develop concepts to explore further in the surveys. We read five of the transcripts and conducted preliminary coding before developing a codebook and standard definitions for each code. We then re-read and, when necessary, re-coded each transcript to ensure standardization. We did all coding and analysis in Spanish and the quotes used to present results are translated into English (see appendix C for list of translated and Spanish quotes). We first coded the transcripts using deductive codes based on the research question and interview guide. Some examples of deductive codes are: financial barriers referring to any cost or price of services that delay or prevent women in accessing an abortion, religion, referring to descriptions of beliefs or fears about spiritual rules regarding abortion. Several distinct and unexpected themes emerged from the interviews and we developed these into inductive codes. Examples of these include: medical training, referring to descriptions of curricula or coursework in medical schools that facilitated, prevented or otherwise affected provision of quality abortion services, and conscientious objection “no debido” or “that should not be done,” referring to doctors that conscientiously objected to provision of abortion in a manner inconsistent with the legal boundaries for conscientious objection.
Qualitative Data Analysis. ‌ To begin the data analysis process, the evaluator listened to interview recordings of seven interviews that occurred either in-person or by phone and identifying important themes and information mentioned by each respondent. Each interview was designed to last no more than 30 minutes. The interviews were coded according to the textual analysis technique based in grounded theory, outlined by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxx in Qualitative Research Methods (Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2011). The themes and information noted were organized under common or overarching themes and also organized according to which evaluation question they responded. A codebook was created and included these themes and their operational definitions. These codes included themes like “relationships” and “experience”. Other primary themes noted during interviews were from the “advice” code, the “needs and barriers”, “outcomes”, “timing”, and “future directions” (Appendix E). Upon organizing this information, results and recommendations were created for the program. Ethics‌ Participant consent was obtained to interview and record them during the interview. After qualitative data analysis, the interview recordings were permanently deleted. Approval by the Emory Institutional Review Board (IRB) was not required because this evaluation was considered program quality improvement (Appendix F).

Related to Qualitative Data Analysis

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Sampling and Analysis The Seller has sole responsibility for quality control of the coal and shall forward its “as loaded” quality to the Buyer as soon as possible. The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer and the results thereof shall be accepted and used for the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or using standards mutually acceptable to both parties. Samples for analyses shall be taken by any ASTM standards or standards mutually acceptable to both parties, and may be composited and shall be taken with a frequency and regularity sufficient to provide reasonably accurate representative samples of the deliveries made hereunder. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or mutually agreeable changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the time of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer; one (l) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary; one (1) part shall be retained by Buyer (LG&E) until the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month following the month of unloading (the “LG&E Disposal Date”) or Buyer (KU) until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (the “KU Disposal Date”), the LG&E Disposal Date and the KU Disposal Date are collectively the “Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date; and one part (“Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the tenth (10th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests a Referee Sample analysis before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder. The Monthly Weighted Averages shall be determined by utilizing the individual shipment analyses. If any dispute arises before the Disposal Date, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, a dispute shall be deemed not to exist and Buyer’s analysis shall prevail and the analysis of the Independent Lab shall be disregarded if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount equal to or less than: (i) 0.50% moisture (ii) 0.50% ash on a dry basis (iii) 100 Btu/lb. on a dry basis (iv) 0.10% sulfur on a dry basis. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount more than the amounts listed above, then the analysis of the Independent Lab shall prevail and Buyer’s analysis shall be disregarded. The cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by Seller to the extent that Buyer’s analysis prevails and by Buyer to the extent that the analysis of the Independent Lab prevails.

  • Evaluation Software If the Software is an evaluation version or is provided to You for evaluation purposes, then, unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor, Your license to use the Software is limited solely for internal evaluation purposes in non-production use and in accordance with the terms of the evaluation offering under which You received the Software, and expires 90 days from installation (or such other period as may be indicated within the Software). Upon expiration of the evaluation period, You must discontinue use of the Software, return to an original state any actions performed by the Software, and delete the Software entirely from Your system and You may not download the Software again unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor. The Software may contain an automatic disabling mechanism that prevents its use after a certain period of time. RESTRICTIONS

  • Clinical Data and Regulatory Compliance The preclinical tests and clinical trials, and other studies (collectively, “studies”) that are described in, or the results of which are referred to in, the Registration Statement or the Prospectus were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with the protocols, procedures and controls designed and approved for such studies and with standard medical and scientific research procedures; each description of the results of such studies is accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly presents the data derived from such studies, and the Company and its subsidiaries have no knowledge of any other studies the results of which are inconsistent with, or otherwise call into question, the results described or referred to in the Registration Statement or the Prospectus; the Company and its subsidiaries have made all such filings and obtained all such approvals as may be required by the Food and Drug Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any committee thereof or from any other U.S. or foreign government or drug or medical device regulatory agency, or health care facility Institutional Review Board (collectively, the “Regulatory Agencies”); neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has received any notice of, or correspondence from, any Regulatory Agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any clinical trials that are described or referred to in the Registration Statement or the Prospectus; and the Company and its subsidiaries have each operated and currently are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable rules, regulations and policies of the Regulatory Agencies.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!