Questionnaire Flow Model Sample Clauses

Questionnaire Flow Model. Having made changes to the questionnaire properties and having eliminated the concept of subjects, it now becomes important to be able to define the way in which questionnaires are related to each other and in what order they should be completed. In order to represent this QM will need to have a separate graphical representation of the study called the Questionnaire Flow model. It is based on the idea that certain questionnaires are chained together in some logical order and have clearly defined relationships that allows them to “belong together”. These questionnaire chains also need some properties in order to be useful. These properties will be defined briefly and then an example will be given to illustrate their use. (1) Starting point Every questionnaire chain needs to start from a Base Questionnaire. In many public health studies an enrollment form or consent form or a household census form may be the required first step. However in some studies there may be more than one base form. For example, there may be a household enrollment base questionnaire, a school census base questionnaire, a health facility base questionnaire, and a water source base questionnaire. It may be that these forms have a relationship, as will be discussed shortly, but the key characteristic of base questionnaires would have to be that they have some independence from one another.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Questionnaire Flow Model

  • QUESTIONNAIRE Full Legal Name of Selling Securityholder:

  • D&O Questionnaires To the Company’s knowledge, all information contained in the questionnaires completed by each of the Company’s directors and officers immediately prior to the Offering as well as in the Lock-Up Agreement provided to the Underwriters is true and correct in all respects and the Company has not become aware of any information which would cause the information disclosed in such questionnaires become inaccurate and incorrect.

  • Underwriters’ Questionnaire Your acceptance of the Invitation Wire for an Offering or your participation in an Offering as an Underwriter will confirm that you have no exceptions to the Underwriters’ Questionnaire attached as Exhibit A hereto (or to any other questions addressed to you in any Wires relating to the Offering previously sent to you), other than exceptions noted by you In Writing in connection with the Offering and received from you by us before the time specified in the Invitation Wire or any subsequent Wire.

  • Questionnaires All information contained in the questionnaires (the “Questionnaires”) completed by the Company and the Sponsor and, to the knowledge of the Company, the Company’s officers, directors and director nominees and provided to the Underwriters, is true and correct and the Company has not become aware of any information that would cause the information disclosed in the Questionnaires completed by the Company, the Sponsor or the Company’s officers, directors and director nominees to become inaccurate and incorrect.

  • Investor Questionnaire The undersigned represents and warrants to the Company that all information that the undersigned has provided to the Company, including, without limitation, the information in the Investor Questionnaire attached hereto or previously provided to the Company (the “Investor Questionnaire”), is correct and complete as of the date hereof.

  • Exhibit C Sector Membership Fishing Year 2015 (May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016)

  • Exhibit F Provisions Addendum:

  • EXHIBIT E Contractor agrees to maintain business records documenting its compliance with the HSP and to submit a monthly compliance report to University in the format required by the Statewide Procurement and Statewide Support Services Division of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts or successor entity (collectively, SPSS). Submission of compliance reports will be required as a condition for payment under this Agreement. If University determines that Contractor has failed to subcontract as set out in the HSP, University will notify Contractor of any deficiencies and give Contractor an opportunity to submit documentation and explain why the failure to comply with the HSP should not be attributed to a lack of good faith effort by Contractor. If University determines that Contractor failed to implement the HSP in good faith, University, in addition to any other remedies, may report nonperformance to the SPSS in accordance with 34 TAC §§20.285(g)(5), 20.585 and 20.586. University may also revoke this Agreement for breach and make a claim against Contractor.

  • Interest Questionnaire - Form CIQ No response Do not upload this form unless you have a reportable conflict with TIPS. There is an Attribute entitled “Conflict of Interest Questionnaire Requirement” immediately followed by an Attribute entitled “Conflict of Interest Questionnaire Requirement – Form CIQ – Continued.” Properly respond to those Attributes and only upload this form if applicable/instructed. If upload is required based on your response to those Attributes, the Conflict of Interest Questionnaire – Form CIQ must be downloaded from the “Attachments” section of the IonWave eBid System, reviewed, properly completed, and uploaded at this location.

  • Exhibit B INSURANCE

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!