Common use of Reasonable Suspicion Test Clause in Contracts

Reasonable Suspicion Test. Tests shall be conducted when a supervisor or District official trained in accordance with law has reasonable suspicion that the driver has violated the District’s alcohol or drug prohibitions. This reasonable suspicion must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the driver’s appearance, speech or body odors. The observations may include indications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of controlled substances. a. Individuals designated to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists must receive at least 60 minutes of training that covers the physical, behavioral, speech and performance indicators of alcohol issue and an additional 60 minutes of training that covers these indicators of controlled substance use. b. Alcohol tests are authorized for reasonable suspicion only if the required observations are made during, just before or just after the period of the workday when the driver must comply with alcohol prohibitions. An alcohol test may not be conducted by the person who determines that reasonable suspicion exists to conduct such a test. If an alcohol test is not administered within two hours of a determination of reasonable suspicion, the District shall prepare and maintain a record explaining why this was not done. Attempts to conduct alcohol tests shall terminate after eight hours. (49 CFR 382.307.) c. A supervisor or District official who makes observations leading to a controlled substance reasonable suspicion test shall make a written record of his/her observations within twenty-four (24) hours of the observed behavior or before the results of the drug test are released, whichever is earlier. (49 CFR 382.211.)

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Reasonable Suspicion Test. Tests shall be conducted when a supervisor or District official trained in accordance with law has reasonable suspicion that the driver has violated the District’s alcohol or drug prohibitions. This reasonable suspicion must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the driver’s appearance, speech or body odors. The observations may include indications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of controlled substances. a. Individuals designated to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists must receive received at least 60 minutes of training that covers the physical, behavioral, speech and performance indicators of alcohol issue and an additional 60 minutes of training that covers these indicators of controlled substance use. b. Alcohol tests are authorized for reasonable suspicion only if the required observations are made during, just before or just after the period of the workday when the driver must comply with alcohol prohibitions. An alcohol test may not be conducted by the person who determines that reasonable suspicion exists to conduct such a test. If an alcohol test is not administered within two hours of a determination of reasonable suspicion, the District shall prepare and maintain a record explaining why this was not done. Attempts to conduct alcohol tests shall terminate after eight hours. (49 CFR 382.307.) c. A supervisor or District official who makes observations leading to a controlled substance reasonable suspicion test shall make a written record of his/her observations within twenty-four (24) hours of the observed behavior or before the results of the drug test are released, whichever is earlier. (49 CFR 382.211.)

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!