Recommendation to Advisory Sample Clauses
Recommendation to Advisory. The purpose of the Advisory Phase is to provide high quality supports for any practitioner that may be struggling in CSTP #1-5. A recommendation of a Practitioner to the Advisory Phase requires a minimum of two formal observations and one reflective conversation with the assigned Facilitator.
3.05.1 In the event the evidence supports the practitioner is not meeting one or more standards, the assigned Facilitator shall complete the Recommendation to Advisory Form to address any areas of concern.
3.05.2 In the case of the Facilitator being a peer, the site Administrator may submit his/her recommendation to the Advisory Team provided the Advisory Recommendation process has been followed and the proper documentation (see Recommendation to Advisory Form) has been completed. In such cases, if the administrator has a concern and the practitioner is working with the peer facilitator, the administrator shall call a meeting with the practitioner and the peer facilitator together to inform them of concerns prior to submitting his/her recommendations to the Advisory Team.
3.05.3 If a practitioner is assigned in an area outside of his/her teaching credential, the Recommendation to Advisory form shall so state.
Recommendation to Advisory. The purpose of the Advisory Phase is to provide high quality supports for any practitioner that may be struggling in CSTP #1-5. A recommendation of a Practitioner to the Advisory Phase requires a minimum of two formal observations and one reflective conversation with the assigned Facilitator.
3.05.1 In the event the evidence suggests the practitioner is not on track to meeting one or more standards, the assigned Facilitator shall:
a. Send a statement of concern notifying the practitioner of the area(s) of concern.
b. Attempt to provide support to the practitioner in the areas identified.
c. Complete the Recommendation to Advisory Form identifying any areas of concern and include supporting evidence.
3.05.2 The practitioner may submit evidence to the PGT and/or appear before the PGT to present information.
a. If the practitioner is in agreement with the recommendation and/or wants the additional support, the practitioner may submit a brief statement stating they want to enter into Advisory and would like to receive additional support. This may occur only within an Advisory Window.
3.05.3 After reviewing the evidence, the PGT shall make the final decision.
a. If the recommendation is not supported, the practitioner shall be deemed to have met standards satisfactorily and shall return to the Professional Practice Phase in accordance with section 3.04.6. The End of Year Summary form shall be completed by an administrator on the PGT.
b. If the PGT affirms the recommendation for the practitioner to participate in the Advisory Phase, an Advisor shall be assigned to the practitioner.
3.05.4 In the case of the Facilitator being a peer, the site Administrator may submit his/her recommendation to the PGT provided the Advisory Recommendation process has been followed and the proper documentation (see section 3.05.1) has been completed.
3.05.5 If a practitioner is assigned in an area outside of his/her teaching credential, the Recommendation to Advisory form shall so state.
3.05.6 For non-instructional staff (Nurses, Social Workers, Counselors, Speech and Language Pathologists), in the event evidence suggest the practitioner is not on track to meet standards, the District and the Association will jointly develop a plan for support.
Recommendation to Advisory. The purpose of the Advisory Phase is to provide high quality supports for any practitioner that may be struggling in CSTP #1-5. A recommendation of a Practitioner to the Advisory Phase requires a minimum of two formal observations and one reflective conversation with the assigned Facilitator.
3.05.1 In the event the evidence supports the practitioner is not meeting one or more standards, the assigned Facilitator shall complete the Recommendation to Advisory Form to address any areas of concern.
3.05.2 In the case of the Facilitator being a peer, the site Administrator may submit his/her recommendation to the Advisory Team provided the Advisory Recommendation process has been followed and the proper documentation (see section 3.04.4 b ii c) has been completed.
3.05.3 If a practitioner is assigned in an area outside of his/her teaching credential, the Recommendation to Advisory form shall so state.