Reduction of Payments in Certain Circumstances. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein (or any other agreement entered into by and between the Company and Executive, or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company), in the event that any amount or benefit paid or distributed to Executive pursuant to this Agreement, taken together with any amounts or benefits otherwise paid to Executive by the Company (collectively, the “Covered Payments”), would constitute an “excess parachute payment” as defined in Section 280G of the Code, and would thereby subject Executive to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (an “Excise Tax”), the provisions of this Section 8 shall apply. If the aggregate present value (as determined for purposes of Section 280G of the Code) of the Covered Payments exceeds the amount which can be paid to Executive without Executive incurring an Excise Tax, then, solely to the extent that Executive would be better off on an after tax basis by receiving the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax, as determined by a nationally recognized accounting firm designated by the Company with the consent of the Executive (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), the amounts payable to Executive under this Agreement (or any other agreement by and between the Executive and Company or pursuant to any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax (such reduced payments to be referred to as the “Payment Cap”). In the event Executive receives reduced payments and benefits as a result of application of this Section 8, Executive shall have the right to designate which of the payments and benefits otherwise set forth herein (or any other agreement between the Company and Executive or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be received in connection with the application of the Payment Cap, subject to the following sentence. Reduction shall be made in the following order: (i) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first, (iii) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code and (iv) payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first.
Appears in 5 contracts
Samples: Release Agreement (Realogy Group LLC), Release Agreement (Realogy Group LLC), Release Agreement (Realogy Group LLC)
Reduction of Payments in Certain Circumstances. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein (or any other agreement entered into by and between the Company and Executive, or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company), in the event that any amount or benefit paid or distributed to Executive pursuant to this Agreement, taken together with any amounts or benefits otherwise paid to Executive by the Company or any Affiliate of the Company (collectively, the “Covered Payments”), would constitute an “excess parachute payment” as defined in Section 280G of the Code, and would thereby subject Executive to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (an “Excise Tax”), the provisions of this Section 8 shall apply. If the aggregate present value (as determined for purposes of Section 280G of the Code) of the Covered Payments exceeds the amount which can be paid to Executive without Executive incurring an Excise Tax, then, solely to the extent that Executive would be better off on an after tax basis by receiving the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax, as determined by a nationally recognized accounting firm designated by the Company (the “Accounting Firm”) with the consent of the Executive (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), the amounts payable to Executive under this Agreement (or any other agreement by and between the Executive and Company or any of its Affiliates or pursuant to any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the CompanyCompany or any of its Affiliates) shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax (such reduced payments to be referred to as the “Payment Cap”). In the event Executive receives reduced payments and benefits as a result of application of this Section 8, Executive shall have the right to designate which of the payments and benefits otherwise set forth herein (or any other agreement between the Company and Executive or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be received in connection with the application of the Payment Cap, subject to the following sentence. Reduction shall be made in the following order: (i) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first, (iii) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code and (iv) payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first. If the Accounting Firm determines that aggregate Covered Payments should be reduced as described above, it shall promptly notify Executive and the Company to that effect. In the absence of manifest error, all determinations made by the Accounting Firm under this Section 8(a) shall be binding on Executive and the Company and shall be made as soon as reasonably practicable and in no event later than fifteen (15) days following the later of Executive’s date of termination of employment or the date of the transaction which causes the application of Section 280G of the Code. The Company shall bear all costs, fees and expenses of the Accounting Firm. To the extent requested by Executive, the Company shall cooperate with Executive in good faith in valuing, and the Accounting Firm shall take into account the value of, services to be provided by Executive (including Executive agreeing to refrain from performing services pursuant to a covenant not to compete) before, on or after the date of the transaction which causes the application of Section 280G of the Code such that payments in respect of such services may be considered to be “reasonable compensation” within the meaning of Q&A-9 and Q&A-40 to Q&A-44 of the final regulations under Section 280G of the Code and/or exempt from the definition of the term “parachute payment” within the meaning of Q&A-2(a) of such final regulations in accordance with Q&A-5(an) of such final regulations. If it is ultimately determined (by IRS private letter ruling or closing agreement, court decision or otherwise) that Executive’s Covered Payments were reduced by too much or by too little in order to accomplish the purpose of this Section 8(a), Executive and the Company shall promptly cooperate to correct such underpayment or overpayment in a manner consistent with the purpose of this Section 8(a).
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Employment Agreement (Anywhere Real Estate Group LLC), Employment Agreement (Realogy Group LLC), Employment Agreement (Realogy Group LLC)
Reduction of Payments in Certain Circumstances. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary contained herein (or any other agreement entered into by and between the Company and Executive, or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company)contrary, in the event it shall be determined that any amount payment or benefit paid or distributed to Executive pursuant to this Agreement, taken together with any amounts or benefits otherwise paid to Executive distribution by the Company to or for the benefit of the Executive (collectivelywhether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise) (such benefits, payments or distributions are hereinafter referred to as “Payments”) would, if paid, be subject to the excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999 (the “Covered Payments”), would constitute an “excess parachute payment” as defined in Section 280G of the Code, and would thereby subject Executive to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (an “Parachute Excise Tax”), then, prior to the provisions making of this Section 8 any Payments to the Executive, a calculation shall applybe made comparing (i) the net after-tax benefit to the Executive of the Payments after payment by the Executive of the Parachute Excise Tax, to (ii) the net after-tax benefit to the Executive if the Payments had been limited to the extent necessary to avoid being subject to the Parachute Excise Tax. If the aggregate present value amount calculated under (as determined for purposes of Section 280G of the Codei) of the Covered Payments exceeds above is less than the amount which can calculated under (ii) above, then the Payments shall be paid to Executive without Executive incurring an Excise Tax, then, solely limited to the extent that Executive would be better off on an after tax basis by receiving the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming necessary to avoid being subject to the Parachute Excise TaxTax (the “Reduced Amount”). The reduction of the Payments due hereunder, if applicable, shall be made by first reducing cash Payments and then, to the extent necessary, reducing those Payments having the next highest ratio of Parachute Value to actual present value of such Payments as of the date of the Change in Control, as determined by a nationally recognized accounting firm designated by the Company Determination Firm (as defined in Section 13(b)(2) below). For purposes of this Section 13(b), present value shall be determined in accordance with the consent Code Section 280G(d)(4). For purposes of the Executive (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayedthis Section 13(b), the amounts payable to Executive “Parachute Value” of a Payment means the present value as of the date of the Change in Control of the portion of such Payment that constitutes a “parachute payment” under this Agreement (or any other agreement by and between the Executive and Company or pursuant to any incentive arrangement or plan offered Code Section 280G(b)(2), as determined by the Company) shall be reduced (but not below zero) Determination Firm for purposes of determining whether and to what extent the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Parachute Excise Tax (will apply to such reduced payments to be referred to as the “Payment Cap”). In the event Executive receives reduced payments and benefits as a result of application of this Section 8, Executive shall have the right to designate which of the payments and benefits otherwise set forth herein (or any other agreement between the Company and Executive or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be received in connection with the application of the Payment Cap, subject to the following sentence. Reduction shall be made in the following order: (i) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first, (iii) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code and (iv) payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced firstPayment.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Waiver and Release (Perry Ellis International, Inc), Waiver and Release (Perry Ellis International, Inc), Waiver and Release (Perry Ellis International Inc)
Reduction of Payments in Certain Circumstances. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein (or any other agreement entered into by and between the Company and Executive, or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company), in the event that any amount or benefit paid or distributed to Executive pursuant to this Agreement, taken together with any amounts or benefits otherwise paid to Executive by the Company (collectively, the “Covered Payments”), would constitute an “excess parachute payment” as defined in Section 280G of the Code, and would thereby subject Executive Employee to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (an “Excise Tax”), the provisions of this Section 8 7 shall apply. If the aggregate present value (as determined for purposes of Section 280G of the Code) of the Covered Payments exceeds the amount which can be paid to Executive without Executive incurring an Excise Tax, then, solely to the extent that Executive would be better off on an after tax basis by receiving the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax, as determined by a nationally recognized accounting firm designated by the Company with the consent of the Executive (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed)Executive, the amounts payable to Executive under this Agreement (or any other agreement by and between the Executive and Company or pursuant to any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax (such reduced payments to be referred to as the “Payment Cap”). In the event Executive receives reduced payments and benefits as a result of application of this Section 87, Executive shall have the right to designate which of the payments and benefits otherwise set forth herein (or any other agreement between the Company and Executive or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be received in connection with the application of the Payment Cap, subject to the following sentence. Reduction shall be made in the following order: (i) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first, (iii) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code and (iv) payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first.”
Appears in 1 contract
Reduction of Payments in Certain Circumstances. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein (or any other agreement entered into by and between the Company and Executive, or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company), in the event that any amount or benefit paid or distributed to Executive pursuant to this Agreement, taken together with any amounts or benefits otherwise paid to Executive by the Company or any Affiliate of the Company (collectively, the “Covered Payments”), would constitute an “excess parachute payment” as defined in Section 280G of the Code, and would thereby subject Executive to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (an “Excise Tax”), the provisions of this Section 8 shall apply. If the aggregate present value (as determined for purposes of Section 280G of the Code) of the Covered Payments exceeds the amount which can be paid to Executive without Executive incurring an Excise Tax, then, solely to the extent that Executive would be better off on an after tax basis by receiving the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax, as determined by a nationally recognized accounting firm designated by the Company with the consent of the Executive (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), the amounts payable to Executive under this Agreement (or any other agreement by and between the Executive and Company or any of its Affiliates or pursuant to any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the CompanyCompany or any of its Affiliates) shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the maximum amount which may be paid hereunder without Executive becoming subject to the Excise Tax (such reduced payments to be referred to as the “Payment Cap”). In the event Executive receives reduced payments and benefits as a result of application of this Section 8, Executive shall have the right to designate which of the payments and benefits otherwise set forth herein (or any other agreement between the Company and Executive or any incentive arrangement or plan offered by the Company) shall be received in connection with the application of the Payment Cap, subject to the following sentence. Reduction shall be made in the following order: (i) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) payments that are valued in full under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first, (iii) at the discretion of Executive, payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are not subject to Section 409A of the Code and (iv) payments that are valued at less than full value under Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1, Q&A 24 and are subject to Section 409A of the Code, with the amounts that are payable last reduced first.
Appears in 1 contract