Reform. If any of Sections 1(a) – 1(c) are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable because unreasonable either as to length of time or area to which the restriction applies, it is the intent of both parties that the court reduce and reform the restriction so as to apply the greatest limitations considered enforceable by the court.
Appears in 23 contracts
Samples: Restricted Share Units Award Agreement (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.), Performance Share Units Award Agreement (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.), Restricted Share Units Award Agreement (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.)
Reform. If any of Sections 1(a) – 1(c1(a)—1(c) are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable because unreasonable either as to length of time or area to which the restriction applies, it is the intent of both parties that the court reduce and reform the restriction so as to apply the greatest limitations considered enforceable by the court.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Cash Payable Incentive Performance Units Award Agreement (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.), Incentive Performance Units Award Agreement (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.)
Reform. If any of Sections 1(a) – - 1(c) are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable because unreasonable either as to length of time or area to which the restriction applies, it is the intent of both parties that the court reduce and reform the restriction so as to apply the greatest limitations considered enforceable by the court.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Restricted Share Units Award Agreement (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.)