Common use of Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs Clause in Contracts

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $40,600 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith Excelta expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith Excelta shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $40,600 23,200 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith GRIP expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith GRIP shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $40,600 13,500 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith Container Store then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith Container Store shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $40,600 35,137 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith Madden expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith Madden shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $40,600 19,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith Wellsco then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith Wellsco International Group, Co., Ltd. shall pay Davia’s counsel pay, pursuant to the procedures of Section 4.4 the amount of $40,600 40,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Beadsmith Exclusive Imports then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Beadsmith and pursuant to the payment procedures described in Section 4.4 below, Exclusive Imports shall pay Davia’s counsel the total amount of $40,600 37,500 for reasonable and necessary fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.