Common use of Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs Clause in Contracts

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $23,200 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta Container Store then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta Container Store shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $23,200 35,137 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta Madden expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta Madden shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $23,200 19,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta Wellsco then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta Wellsco International Group, Co., Ltd. shall pay Davia’s counsel pay, pursuant to the procedures of Section 4.4 the amount of $23,200 40,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta Exclusive Imports then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta and pursuant to the payment procedures described in Section 4.4 below, Exclusive Imports shall pay Davia’s counsel the total amount of $23,200 37,500 for reasonable and necessary fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta Beadsmith expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta Beadsmith shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $23,200 40,600 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.

Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Excelta GRIP expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Excelta GRIP shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $23,200 13,500 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.