REQUIRED SEPARATION OF INSURED PROVISION; CROSS-LIABILITY EXCLUSION AND OTHER ENDORSEMENTS PROHIBITED Sample Clauses

REQUIRED SEPARATION OF INSURED PROVISION; CROSS-LIABILITY EXCLUSION AND OTHER ENDORSEMENTS PROHIBITED. Consultant’s insurance policy shall include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause that applies coverage separately to each insured and additional insured, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Consultant’s insurance policy shall not contain any provision, exclusion or endorsement that limits, bars, or effectively precludes the City of Seattle from coverage or asserting a claim under the Consultant’s insurance policy on the basis that the coverage or claim is brought by an insured or additional insured against an insured or additional insured under the policy. Consultant’s CGL policy shall NOT include any of the following Endorsements (or their equivalent endorsement or exclusions): (a) Contractual Liability Limitation, (CGL Form 21 39 or equivalent), b) Amendment Of Insured Contract Definition, (CGL Form 24 26 or equivalent), (c) Limitation of Coverage to Designated Premises or Project, (CGL Form 21 44 or equivalent), (d) any endorsement modifying or deleting the exception to the Employer’s Liability exclusion, (e) any “Insured vs. Insured” or “cross-liability” exclusion, and (f) any type of punitive, exemplary or multiplied damages exclusion. Consultant’s failure to comply with any of the requisite insurance provisions shall be a material breach of, and grounds for, the immediate termination of the Contract with the City of Seattle; or if applicable, and at the discretion of the City of Seattle, shall serve as grounds for the City to procure or renew insurance coverage with any related costs of premiums to be repaid by Consultant or reduced and/or offset against the Contract.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
REQUIRED SEPARATION OF INSURED PROVISION; CROSS-LIABILITY EXCLUSION AND OTHER ENDORSEMENTS PROHIBITED. Agency’s insurance policy shall include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause that applies coverage separately to each insured and additional insured, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Agency’s insurance policy shall not contain any provision, exclusion or endorsement that limits, bars, or effectively precludes the City of Seattle from coverage or asserting a claim under the Agency’s insurance policy on the basis that the coverage or claim is brought by an insured or additional insured against an insured or additional insured under the policy. Agency’s CGL policy shall NOT include any of the following Endorsements (or their equivalent endorsement or exclusions): (a) Contractual Liability Limitation, (CGL Form 21 39 or equivalent), (b) Amendment of Insured Contract Definition, (CGL Form 24 26 or equivalent), (c) Limitation of Coverage to Designated Premises or Project, (CGL Form 21 44 or equivalent), (d) any endorsement modifying or deleting the exception to the Employer’s Liability exclusion,
REQUIRED SEPARATION OF INSURED PROVISION; CROSS-LIABILITY EXCLUSION AND OTHER ENDORSEMENTS PROHIBITED. PWRF’s insurance policy shall include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause that applies coverage separately to each insured and additional insured, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. PWRF’s insurance policy shall not contain any provision, exclusion or endorsement that limits, bars, or effectively precludes the City from coverage or asserting a claim under PWRF’s insurance policy on the basis that the coverage or claim is brought by an insured or additional insured against an insured or additional insured under the policy. PWRF’s failure to comply with any of the requisite insurance provisions shall, at the discretion of the City, serve as grounds for the City to procure or renew insurance coverage with any related costs of premiums to be repaid by PWRF or reduced and/or offset against the Agreement.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.