Research Alignment Sample Clauses

Research Alignment. 10% How does the research align with the Department’s Grant Priority Research Question as listed on pages 5-6 of this Application AND How does the research align with Queensland Government priorities and strategies and/or the Xxxxx Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration? If relevant, how does the research align with the Australian Curriculum or Early Years Learning Framework? (Max 250 words)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Research Alignment. 10% For Research Projects under the desktop research/data analysis, priority school discipline research areas, open research and second phase streams: How does the research align with the Department’s research priorities (include the specific priority research theme OR topic the research addresses)? (Max 250 words) For Research Projects under the Horizon research stream: Outline alignment with the Department’s research priorities where relevant. Outline the justification for this research and the benefits to the Department of funding this Research Project. (Max 600 words)
Research Alignment. 12.5% How does the research align with the Department’s research priorities? Include the specific priority research question the research addresses if relevant. AND/OR How does the research align with Advancing Education, the Cultural Capability Framework, or other Queensland Government initiatives? If relevant, how does the research align with the Australian Curriculum or Early Years Learning Framework? How is this research of value to advancing knowledge in this field? Will the research validate existing studies that have important findings but are yet to be replicated? What gaps in the research literature does this research address? What is the likelihood that, if the research is successful, it will work on a significant scale, for example, as an ARC linkage project? Does the project methodology, as described, demonstrate a high quality design (ie evidence is generated in a systematic, rigorous way using valid and replicable methods)? Is the research well planned, achievable and able to meet agreed timeframes? Is the project budget reflective of the research activities to be undertaken? What are the qualifications and experience of key personnel involved in the research project? If a group submission, do researchers have experience of working as a team? Does the team represent a diverse range of expertise and backgrounds? Where research will involve Aboriginal and/or Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Islander people, do the researchers demonstrate appropriate knowledge and cultural understanding? Does the team (or any member of the team) have demonstrated research translation experience? Imposition: 15% (a high score indicates minimal, mitigated or justifiable impost) What imposition will the project place on the Department? Has the research team tried to minimise the imposition of the research? Do the benefits of the research outweigh its imposition? What is the likely time and resourcing required of the Department in participating or supporting this research? Value for investment: 20% Has the researcher engaged with end-users? Is there potential for the research to be applied or translatable? What are the likely benefits from the research to the Department’s staff, students and/or broader Queensland population? What are the likely outcomes or products from the research that may inform Department policies or practice? Is the level of funding justified (i.e., there are no unnecessary expenses included in the budget)? Does the research deliver value for money through social...

Related to Research Alignment

  • Research Primary Investigator as part of a multi-site study (25 points) • Co-Investigator as part of a multi-site study (20 points) • Primary Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (15 points) • Co-Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (10 points) • Develops a unit specific research proposal (5 points) • Conducts a literature review as part of a research study (5 points)

  • Collaboration 31.1 If the Buyer has specified in the Order Form that it requires the Supplier to enter into a Collaboration Agreement, the Supplier must give the Buyer an executed Collaboration Agreement before the Start date. 31.2 In addition to any obligations under the Collaboration Agreement, the Supplier must: 31.2.1 work proactively and in good faith with each of the Buyer’s contractors 31.2.2 co-operate and share information with the Buyer’s contractors to enable the efficient operation of the Buyer’s ICT services and G-Cloud Services

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Development Program A. Development activities to be undertaken (Please break activities into subunits with the date of completion of major milestones) B. Estimated total development time

  • Research Program The term “

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Research Collaboration 3.7.1 Aarvik shall carry out the activities of each Work Item and deliver the required Data Package and/or deliverables in accordance with the applicable SOW. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Aarvik shall, in accordance with the applicable SOWs and the timeline approved by JRC, apply the Aarvik IP to (i) design and synthesize Collaboration Compounds, and (ii) by itself or through subcontractor(s), [***]. During the Research Term, if any Party identifies any Third Party Patent or Know-How that is necessary or reasonably useful for any activity under the SOWs but has not been included in the Aarvik IP, then such Party shall immediately inform the other Party and the Parties shall discuss in good faith the need of obtaining a license from such Third Party. 3.7.2 No later than [***] ([***]) days after completion of the [***], Aarvik shall, to the extent not already provided to ArriVent, deliver the Data Packages and all other deliverables required under the [***], as well as the results of the Patentability and FTO Analysis as described in Section 3.2.3, to ArriVent. ArriVent shall have the sole discretion to decide whether or not to advance any Collaboration Compound and which Collaboration Compound(s) will be advanced for further studies beyond the [***]. ArriVent shall inform Axxxxx of its decision in writing. If AxxxXxxx decides to advance the Collaboration Program to [***], ArriVent shall make the payment for the [***] pursuant to Section 6.2.1. 3.7.3 If, upon completion of the [***] for the Collaboration Program, AxxxXxxx decides not to advance the Collaboration Program to [***], ArriVent may terminate the Collaboration Program. If AxxxXxxx decides to advance the Collaboration Program to [***], ArriVent shall make the payment for the [***] pursuant to Section 6.2.1. 3.7.4 No later than [***] ([***]) days after completion of the [***], Aarvik shall, to the extent not already provided to ArriVent, deliver all Data Packages and deliverables required under the [***] to ArriVent. ArriVent shall have the sole discretion to decide whether or not to advance any Collaboration Compound and which Collaboration Compound(s) will be advanced for further studies beyond the [***]. ArriVent shall inform Axxxxx of its decision in writing. 3.7.5 No later than [***] ([***]) days after completion of the [***], Aarvik shall, to the extent not already provided to ArriVent, deliver all Data Packages and deliverables required under the [***] to ArriVent. 3.7.6 Within [***] ([***]) days after completion of the [***], Aarvik shall deliver to ArriVent a full report on all key results and findings of the Collaboration Program, and such other data, results and information as ArriVent may deem necessary for it to determine whether or not to exercise the Option (the “Full Report”).

  • Commercialization Intrexon shall have the right to develop and Commercialize the Reverted Products itself or with one or more Third Parties, and shall have the right, without obligation to Fibrocell, to take any such actions in connection with such activities as Intrexon (or its designee), at its discretion, deems appropriate.

  • Research Project The findings of any research project, which would change the provisions of this Agreement will not be implemented until such changes are negotiated and agreed to by the parties.

  • Research Plan The Parties recognize that the Research Plan describes the collaborative research and development activities they will undertake and that interim research goals set forth in the Research Plan are good faith guidelines. Should events occur that require modification of these goals, then by mutual agreement the Parties can modify them through an amendment, according to Paragraph 13.6.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!