Review and Resolution Process Sample Clauses

Review and Resolution Process. The Gemini Board Chair, in consultation with the Executive Agency, Designated Member, and appointing organization, as necessary, will ensure that the disclosure of conflict of interest is evaluated in an objective, reasonable, fair, and timely manner guided by the concepts and principles contained herein. In a case where the Gemini Board Chair may have a real or suggested conflict, he or she is to be replaced by the Gemini Board Vice-Chair in all actions of this Review and Resolution Process. The evaluation is intended to: • Determine if disclosure is required; • Identify and discuss the conflicts (real, potential, or perceived); • Clarify the issues and how they relate to pending Gemini Board actions; • Ascertain the category (degree) in which the potential conflict falls; • Develop possible remedies. The potentially conflicted Gemini Board member may also suggest to the Gemini Board Chair mechanisms to manage any potential conflicts of interest, including exclusion from decision-making process, voting recusal, no action, and describe reasons for recommending such strategies. It is understood that the Gemini Board Chair also has the responsibility for reporting a finding on the appropriate course of action. The Gemini Board Chair, at his or her discretion, may request concurrence based on the majority vote of Gemini Board members in attendance at the meeting (exclusive of the individuals under discussion). Notice of concurrence deliberations in the minutes of the Gemini Board should including a brief executive statement articulating the position of the Gemini Board regarding its action. The Gemini Board Chair, communicating through the Secretary of the Gemini Board, also can request a Board consensus by email majority vote. This process shall include advanced confidential dissemination of the conflict of interest charge and a finding summary to Board members, with a response to the Secretary required within 3 days of receipt. As a matter of practice, Gemini Board members are bound to abide by processes and outcomes to resolve personal, scientific, and professional conflict of interest. ANNEX C ADDRESSES FOR THE PARTICIPANTS AND UH FOR FINANCIAL MATTERS
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Review and Resolution Process

  • COMPLAINTS HANDLING AND RESOLUTION 44.1 The Supplier shall notify the Authority of any Complaints made by Other Contracting Bodies, which are not resolved by operation of the Supplier's usual complaints handling procedure within five (5) Working Days of becoming aware of that Complaint and such notice shall contain full details of the Supplier's plans to resolve such Complaint.

  • Issue Resolution Process Section 1001:

  • DNS resolution RTT Refers to either “UDP DNS resolution RTT” or “TCP DNS resolution RTT”.

  • UDP DNS resolution RTT Refers to the RTT of the sequence of two packets, the UDP DNS query and the corresponding UDP DNS response. If the RTT is 5 times greater than the time specified in the relevant SLR, the RTT will be considered undefined.

  • Issue Resolution Procedures As soon as possible after any occupational health and safety issue has been reported, the company’s or management representative and elected safety representative must meet to try to resolve the issue. The resolution of the issue must take into account those of the following factors that are relevant: o Whether the hazard or risk can be isolated o The number and location of employees affected o Whether appropriate temporary measures are possible or desirable o Whether environmental monitoring is desirable o The time that may elapse before the hazard or risk is permanently corrected o Who is responsible for performing work and overseeing the removal of the hazard or risk. As soon as possible after the resolution of an issue, details of the agreement must be brought to the attention of affected employees in an appropriate manner. Should the matter not be resolved, the issue shall be dealt with in line with Clause 20 of the VBIA “Safety Disputes Resolution Procedure”.

  • TCP DNS resolution RTT Refers to the RTT of the sequence of packets from the start of the TCP connection to its end, including the reception of the DNS response for only one DNS query. If the RTT is 5 times greater than the time specified in the relevant SLR, the RTT will be considered undefined.

  • Problem Resolution The parties will endeavour to resolve any problems identified with the operation of this Agreement as they arise.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • DISPUTES RESOLUTION PROCEDURE 10.1 A major objective of this Agreement is to eliminate lost time and/or production arising out of disputes or grievances. The Parties to this Agreement are committed to complying with the terms of this procedure.

  • Grievance Resolution If a grievance is resolved at Step 2 or 3 in the procedure as provided herein, the grievant concerned shall indicate acceptance of the resolution by affixing his/her signature in the appropriate space indicated. If the employee has been represented by the Union at the Step of the procedure at which a resolution is reached, the Union representative shall also sign the appropriate document acknowledging that the employee has accepted the resolution. Decisions on grievances where an employee represents him/herself shall not be considered precedent setting or binding with regard to any future grievances filed with respect to the same or similar matters.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.