Common use of Review of Proposed Publications Clause in Contracts

Review of Proposed Publications. The receiving Party will review the manuscript, abstract, text or any other material provided under Section 11.1 to determine if patentable subject matter is disclosed. The reviewing Party will notify the publishing Party within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of the proposed publication if the reviewing Party, in good faith, determines that patentable subject matter is or may be disclosed, or if the reviewing Party, in good faith, believes confidential or proprietary information is or may be disclosed. If it is determined by the reviewing Party that patent applications should be filed, the publishing Party shall delay its submission for publication or presentation for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days from the reviewing Party's receipt of the proposed publication to allow time for the filing of patent applications covering patentable subject matter. In the event that the delay needed to complete the filing of any necessary patent application will exceed the thirty (30) day period, the Parties will discuss the need for obtaining an extension of the publication delay beyond the thirty (30)-day period. If it is determined in good faith by the reviewing Party that confidential or proprietary information of it is being disclosed, the Parties will consult in good faith to arrive at an agreement on mutually acceptable modifications to the proposed publication to avoid such disclosure. The publishing Party of any manuscript, text or oral presentation will acknowledge the other Party for its contribution to the material being published or presented and to the Research Program. Each party shall be named as a co-author on such publications disclosing the information of the other Party.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Research Collaboration and License Agreement (Cadus Pharmaceutical Corp), Research Collaboration and License Agreement (Cadus Pharmaceutical Corp)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Review of Proposed Publications. The receiving Party will review the manuscript, abstract, text or any other material provided under Section 11.1 to determine if 12.1 for the express purpose of determining whether patentable subject matter or Confidential Information (as such term is defined herein) is disclosed. The reviewing other Party will notify the publishing Party within fifteen (15) working 30 days of receipt of the proposed publication if the reviewing other Party, in good faith, determines that patentable subject matter is or may be disclosed, or if the reviewing other Party, in good faith, believes confidential Confidential Information or proprietary information is or may be disclosed. If it is determined by the reviewing other Party that patent applications should be filed, the publishing Party shall delay its submission for publication or presentation for a period not to exceed thirty (30) 90 days from the reviewing other Party's receipt of the proposed publication to allow time for the filing of patent applications covering patentable subject matter. In the event that the delay needed to complete the filing of any necessary patent application will exceed the thirty (30) 90-day period, the Parties will discuss the need for obtaining an extension of the publication delay beyond the thirty (30)-day 90-day period. If it is determined in good faith by the reviewing other Party that confidential Confidential Information or proprietary information of it is being disclosed, the Parties will consult in good faith to arrive at an agreement on mutually acceptable modifications to the proposed publication to avoid such disclosure. The publishing Party of any manuscript, text or oral presentation will acknowledge the other Party for its contribution to the material being published or presented and presented. In addition, to the Research Program. Each party foregoing, SGI shall be named as a cocooperate with BMS to allow BMS to fulfill any obligations it may have under the respective BMS In-author Licenses on such publications disclosing the information account of the other Partyany proposed publication by SGI.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: License Agreement (Seattle Genetics Inc /Wa), License Agreement (Seattle Genetics Inc /Wa)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Review of Proposed Publications. The receiving Party will review the manuscript, abstract, text or any other material provided under Section 11.1 to determine if 12.1 for the express purpose of determining whether patentable subject matter or Confidential Information (as such term is defined herein) is disclosed. The reviewing other Party will notify the publishing Party within fifteen (15) working 30 days of receipt of the proposed publication if the reviewing other Party, in good faith, determines that patentable subject matter is or may be disclosed, or if the reviewing other Party, in good faith, believes confidential Confidential Information or proprietary information is or may be disclosed. If it is determined by the reviewing other Party that patent applications should be filed, the publishing Party shall delay its submission for publication or presentation for a period not to exceed thirty (30) 90 days from the reviewing other Party's ’s receipt of the proposed publication to allow time for the filing of patent applications covering patentable subject matter. In the event that the delay needed to complete the filing of any necessary patent application will exceed the thirty (30) 90-day period, the Parties will discuss the need for obtaining an extension of the publication delay beyond the thirty (30)-day 90-day period. If it is determined in good faith by the reviewing other Party that confidential Confidential Information or proprietary information of it is being disclosed, the Parties will consult in good faith to arrive at an agreement on mutually acceptable modifications to the proposed publication to avoid such disclosure. The publishing Party of any manuscript, text or oral presentation will acknowledge the other Party for its contribution to the material being published or presented and presented. In addition, to the Research Program. Each party foregoing, SGI shall be named as a cocooperate with BMS to allow BMS to fulfill any obligations it may have under the respective BMS In-author Licenses on such publications disclosing the information account of the other Partyany proposed publication by SGI.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: License Agreement (Seattle Genetics Inc /Wa)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!