Review Procedures a. In consultation with the Illinois SHPO, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Upon the determination by the CRS that a proposed undertaking is included in Appendix A, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the SHPO for that undertaking. A list of undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties comprises Appendix B.
b. The lists of undertakings provided in Appendices A and B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the SHPO without requiring an amendment to this Illinois Prototype Agreement. The NRCS State Office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale for classifying the practices accordingly.
c. Undertakings identified in Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V.
a. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to implementing the undertaking.
1) NRCS may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11.
2) The NRCS shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties.
3) Where the NRCS proposes a finding of "no historic properties affected" or "no adverse effect" to historic properties, the SHPO shall have 30 calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. The NRCS shall take into account all timely comments.
i. If the SHPO, or another consulting party, disagrees with NRCS' findings and/or determination, it shall notify the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar daytime period. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO or other consulting party to attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved through this consultation, NRCS shall follow the dispute resolution process in Stipu...
Review Procedures. The parties agree to jointly conduct a review, sampling transactions of the incidents managed under this agreement. Findings that are inconsistent with the normal or accepted way of doing business will be reconciled on a case by case basis. Any decision to further examine records will be considered on a case by case basis and appropriate follow up action agreed upon by all agencies involved.
Review Procedures. Section 1. Grievance Procedure 15 Section 2. Dismissal of Professional Employees 17 Section 3. Availability of Personnel Files 17 Section 4 Discipline/Dismissal 18 Section 5. Professional Growth Plan 18 Section 6. Input of Principal's Performance 18 Section 7. Certificated Employee Evaluation 18
Review Procedures. A request for review of a denied claim must be made in writing to Plan Administrator within sixty (60) days after receiving notice of denial (one hundred eighty (180) days in the case of a claim involving Disability Retirement Benefits). The decision upon review will be made within sixty (60) days after Plan Administrator’s receipt of a request for review (forty-five (45) days in the case of a claim involving Disability Retirement Benefits), unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, in which case a decision will be rendered not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of a request for review (ninety (90) days in the case of a claim for Disability Retirement Benefits). A notice of such an extension must be provided to the Claimant within the initial sixty (60) day period (the initial forty-five (45) day period in the case of a claim for Disability Retirement Benefits) and must explain the special circumstances and provide an expected date of decision. The reviewer shall afford the Claimant an opportunity to review and receive, without charge, all relevant documents, information and records and to submit issues and comments in writing to Plan Administrator. The reviewer shall take into account all comments, documents, records and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim regardless of whether the information was submitted or considered in the benefit determination. Upon completion of its review of an adverse initial claim determination, Plan Administrator will give the Claimant, in writing or by electronic notification, a notice containing:
(i) its decision;
(ii) the specific reasons for the decision;
(iii) the relevant Agreement provisions on which its decision is based;
(iv) a statement that the Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and without charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information in the Agreement’s files which is relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefit;
(v) a statement describing the Claimant’s right to bring an action for judicial review under Section 502(a) of ERISA; and
(vi) in the case of any claim involving Disability Retirement Benefits, a copy of any internal rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar criterion that was relied upon in making the adverse determination on review or a statement that a copy of the rule, guideline, protocol or other similar criterion was relied upon in making the adverse determination ...
Review Procedures. A request for review of a denied claim must be made in writing to the Plan Administrator within sixty (60) days after receiving notice of denial. The decision upon review will be made within sixty (60) days after the Plan Administrator's receipt of a request for review, unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, in which case a decision will be rendered not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of a request for review. A notice of such an extension must be provided to the Claimant within the initial sixty (60) day period and must explain the special circumstances and provide an expected date of decision. The reviewer will afford the Claimant an opportunity to review and receive, without charge, all relevant documents, information and records and to submit issues and comments in writing to the Plan Administrator. The reviewer will take into account all comments, documents, records and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim regardless of whether the information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. Upon completion of its review of an adverse initial claim determination, the Plan Administrator will give the Claimant, in writing or by electronic notification, a notice containing:
(i) its decision;
(ii) the specific reasons for the decision;
(iii) the relevant Plan provisions or insurance contract provisions on which its decision is based;
(iv) a statement that the Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and without charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information in the Plan's files which is relevant to the Claimant's claim for benefits;
(v) a statement describing the Claimant's right to bring an action for judicial review under ERISA section 502(a); and
(vi) if an internal rule, guideline, protocol or other similar criterion was relied upon in making the adverse determination on review, a statement that a copy of the rule, guideline, protocol or other similar criterion will be provided without charge to the Claimant upon request.
Review Procedures. A request for review of a denied claim must be made in writing to the Plan Sponsor within sixty (60) days after receiving notice of denial. The decision upon review will be made within sixty (60) days (forty-five (45) days for a Disability claim) after the Plan Sponsor’s receipt of a request for review. If the Plan Sponsor determines that an extension of time for processing is required, written notice of the extension shall be furnished to the claimant (which will include the expected date of rendering a decision) prior to the termination of the initial period, but in no event will the extension exceed sixty (60) days (forty-five (45) days for a Disability claim). The reviewer shall afford the Claimant an opportunity to review and receive, without charge, all relevant documents, information, and records and to submit issues and comments in writing to the Plan Sponsor. The reviewer shall take into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim regardless of whether the information was submitted or considered in the benefit determination. Upon completion of its review of an adverse initial claim determination, the Plan Sponsor will give the Claimant, in writing or by electronic notification, a notice containing:
(i) its decision;
(ii) the specific reasons for the decision;
(iii) the relevant Plan provisions on which its decision is based;
(iv) a statement that the Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and without charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information in the Plan’s files which is relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefit;
(v) a statement describing the Claimant’s right to bring an action for judicial review under ERISA Section 502(a); and
(vi) If an internal rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar criterion was relied upon in making the adverse determination on review, a statement that a copy of the rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar criterion will be provided without charge to the Claimant upon request.
Review Procedures. (i) Benefit Claims that do not Require a Determination of Disability. Except for claims requiring an independent determination of a Participant's disability status, a request for review of a denied claim must be made in writing to the Plan Administrator within sixty (60) days after receiving notice of denial. The decision upon review will be made within sixty (60) days after the Plan Administrator's receipt of a request for review, unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, in which case a decision will be rendered not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of a request for review. A notice of such an extension must be provided to the Claimant within the initial sixty (60) day period and must explain the special circumstances and provide an expected date of decision. The reviewer will afford the Claimant an opportunity to review and receive, without charge, all relevant documents, information and records and to submit issues and comments in writing to the Plan Administrator. The reviewer will take into account all comments, documents, records and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim regardless of whether the information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination.
Review Procedures. NRCS Massachusetts and the Xxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Community agree to use the classification system established in Appendices A-B to determine the potential of an undertaking being planned under any NRCS Massachusetts program to affect cultural resources. Trained NRCS personnel will use the cultural resources procedures contained in Appendix D.
A. In consultation with the Xxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Community, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Table 1 located in Appendix A or under non-intrusive conditions in Table 2 located in Appendix B. Upon the determination that a proposed undertaking is included in Table 1 or under non-intrusive conditions in Table 2, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the Xxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Community for that undertaking. In consultation with the Xxxxxxxxxxx- Xxxxxx Community, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix B.
B. The list of undertakings provided in Appendices A-B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the Xxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Community without requiring an amendment to this State-based Prototype Agreement. The NRCS Massachusetts state office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale (metadata) for classifying the practices accordingly.
C. Undertakings not identified in Table 1 of Appendix A or under non-intrusive conditions in Table 2 of Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V.C and Appendix B. The NRCS shall define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to approving the financial assistance for the undertaking.
1. NRCS will provide a single annual report to the Xxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Community containing a summary of the previous fiscal year’s cultural resources investigations, including proposed APEs, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11. Field personnel will use the NRCS Massachusetts Practice Description Form for Cultural Resources Review to describe planned undertakin...
Review Procedures a. In consultation with the SHPO, Caddo Nation of Oklahoma, and other Indian tribes, NRCS Louisiana shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Also listed in Appendix A are undertakings that have the potential to affect historic properties and undertakings that have a high potential to affect historic properties. Undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties will not require further consultation with the SHPO and Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.
b. The list of undertakings provided in Appendix A may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS Louisiana State Conservationist, the SHPO, and Caddo Nation without requiring an amendment to this State-based Prototype Agreement. The NRCS Louisiana State office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale (metadata) for classifying the practices accordingly.
c. Undertakings that have the potential to affect historic properties and those that have a high potential to affect historic properties identified in Appendix A shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V.c and Appendix B. NRCS Louisiana shall consult with the SHPO and Indian tribes to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to approving the financial assistance for the undertaking.
1. NRCS Louisiana may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO and Indian tribes provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11.
2. NRCS Louisiana shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties.
3. Where NRCS Louisiana proposes a finding of “no historic properties affected” or “no adverse effect” to historic properties, the SHPO and Indian tribes shall have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. NRCS Louisiana shall take into account all ti...
Review Procedures. If a Claimant is notified of an Adverse Benefit Determination, the Claimant or his authorized representative may make a written request for review of the determination by submitting such request to the Plan Administrator within 60 days after notification of the Adverse Benefit Determination. A Claimant’s written request for review will be forwarded by the Plan Administrator to the Board of Directors of the Company (other than you and other than the members of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Company) for a full and fair review. No individual will review a claim who reviewed the Claimant’s initial claim for benefits, or who is a subordinate of such individual. The Claimant will be provided the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim for benefits. The Claimant will also be provided, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefits. The Board of Directors will conduct its review without deference to the initial benefit determination and taking into account all comments, documents, records and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination.
