Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that:
(a) KDMC’s Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). KDMC shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of KDMC’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after KDMC’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify KDMC of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, KDMC may request a meeting with OIG to:
(a) discuss the results of any Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. KDMC agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.E.6 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Interventional Cardiac Procedures Review, Arrangements Review, or Unallowable Cost Review issues with KDMC prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) the Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). CCH shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of CCH’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after CCH’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify CCH of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, CCH may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. CCH agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with CCH prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) any Arrangements Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Arrangements Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Arrangements Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Arrangements Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Xxxxx shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of an Arrangements Review submitted as part of Xxxxx’x final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Xxxxx’x final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Xxxxx in writing of its intent to do so and provide an explanation of the reasons OIG has determined a Validation Review is necessary. Xxxxx shall have 30 days following the date of the OIG’s written notice to submit a written response to OIG that includes any additional or relevant information to clarify the results of the Arrangements Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Arrangements Review and/or propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. The final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event HHS has reason to believe that: (a) the Monitor reviews or reports fail to conform to the requirements of this CAP; or (b) the Monitor report results are inaccurate, HHS may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Monitor reviews or reports complied with the requirements of the CAP are inaccurate (“Validation Review”). Prior to initiating a Validation Review, HHS shall notify UCLAHS of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why HHS believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by HHS, UCLAHS may request a meeting with HHS to discuss the results of any Monitor review reports; present any additional or relevant information to clarify the results of the Monitor review to correct the inaccuracy of the Monitor review and/or report; and/or propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. UCLAHS shall provide any additional information as may be requested by HHS under this section in an expedited manner. HHS will attempt in good faith to resolve any Monitor review concerns with UCLAHS prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of HHS.
Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that:
(a) any Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Tri-County shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents so long as it is initiated within one year after Tri- County’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Tri-County in writing of its intent to conduct a Validation Review and the reasons OIG has determined a Validation Review is necessary. Tri-County shall have up to 30 days following the date of the OIG’s written notice to submit a written response to OIG that includes any additional or relevant information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review and/or to propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Tri-County prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) any Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). 21st Century shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of a Claims Review submitted as part of 21st Century’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after 21st Century’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify 21st Century in writing of its intent to do so and provide an explanation of the reasons OIG has determined a Validation Review is necessary. 21st Century shall have 30 days following the date of the OIG’s written notice to submit a written response to OIG that includes any additional or relevant information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review and/or propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. The final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event HHS, in its discretion, determines or has reason to believe that: (a) one or more Assessor Reports fail to conform to the requirements of this CAP; or (b) one or more Assessor Reports are factually inaccurate or otherwise improper or incomplete, HHS may, in its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Assessor Report(s) comply with the requirements of this CAP and/or are factually inaccurate, incorrect or otherwise improper ("Validation Review"). Prior to initiating a Validation Review, HHS shall notify the Contact Person of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why HHS believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by HHS, the Contact Person may request a meeting with HHS to discuss the results of any Assessor review submissions or findings; present any additional or relevant information to clarify the results of the Assessor review to correct the inaccuracy of the Assessor review; and/or propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. The Contact Person shall provide any additional information as may be requested by HHS under this section in an expedited manner. HHS will attempt in good faith to resolve any Assessor review concerns with the Contact Person prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of HHS.
Validation Review. In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) any IRO Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the applicable IRO Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Allergan shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Allergan’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Allergan’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Allergan of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Allergan may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the applicable Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Allergan agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Review issues with Allergan prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.
Validation Review. In the event HHS has reason to believe that (a) a Monitor Review or Monitor Report fails to conform to the requirements of this CAP; or