Common use of Reviewing process Clause in Contracts

Reviewing process. 5.1. Reviewing process follows these steps: ▪ 1st Step: The Editor in Chief will make an initial screening of the paper submitted in order to determine if it is suitable with the scope and the aims of the journal. ▪ 2nd Step: The submission received will be checked with the anti-plagiarism software before will undergo a double blind peer reviewing process. If the report indicates suspicious, the paper will be rejected, else will follows next stage. ▪ 3rd Step: The paper is double-blind peer reviewed by the members of Editorial Advisory Board, according with the area of research indicated by the JEL Classification specified by the author in its paper. ▪ 4th Step: The final decision is made by the Editor in Chief based on the recommendations and comments of reviewers. The Editor in Chief decides whether the paper should be accepted as it is, revised (with minor or major corrections) or rejected. Any changes which affecting the substance of the text will, of course, only be made in agreement with the author. The reviewing process usually takes between 3 and 6 weeks but sometimes, due to number of papers, complexity of research submitted could be up to 10 weeks. If the Reviewing process takes more than 10 weeks, the ‘Author’ could withdrawal the ‘Article’ without any claim from the ‘Publisher’.

Reviewing process. 5.1. Reviewing process follows these steps: ▪ 1st Step: The Editor in Chief will make an initial screening of the paper submitted in order to determine if it is suitable with the scope and the aims of the journal. ▪ 2nd Step: The submission received will be checked with the anti-plagiarism software before will undergo a double blind peer reviewing process. If the report indicates suspicious, the paper will be rejected, else will follows next stage. ▪ 3rd Step: The paper is double-blind peer reviewed by the members of Editorial Advisory Board, according with the area of research indicated by the JEL Classification specified by the author in its paper. ▪ 4th Step: The final decision is made by the Editor in Chief based on the recommendations and comments of reviewers. The Editor in Chief decides whether the paper should be accepted as it is, revised (with minor or major corrections) or rejected. Any changes which affecting the substance of the text will, of course, only be made in agreement with the author. The reviewing process usually takes between 3 and 6 weeks but sometimes, due to number of papers, complexity of research submitted could be up to 10 weeks. If the Reviewing process takes more than 10 weeks, the ‘Author’ could withdrawal the ‘Article’ without any claim from the ‘Publisher’.

Reviewing process. 5.1. Reviewing process follows these steps: ▪ 1st Step: The Editor in Chief will make an initial screening of the paper submitted in order to determine if it is suitable with the scope and the aims of the journal. ▪ 2nd Step: The submission received will be checked with the anti-plagiarism software before will undergo a double blind peer reviewing process. If the report indicates suspicious, the paper will be rejected, else will follows next stage. ▪ 3rd Step: The paper is double-blind peer reviewed by the members of Editorial Advisory Board, according with the area of research indicated by the JEL Classification specified by the author in its paper. ▪ 4th Step: The final decision is made by the Editor in Chief based on the recommendations and comments of reviewers. The Editor in Chief decides whether the paper should be accepted as it is, revised (with minor or major corrections) or rejected. Any changes which affecting the substance of the text will, of course, only be made in agreement with the author. The reviewing process usually takes between 3 and 6 weeks but sometimes, due to number of papers, complexity of research submitted could be up to 10 weeks. If the Reviewing process takes more than 10 weeks, the ‘“Author’ ” could withdrawal the ‘“Article’ ” without any claim from the ‘“Publisher’”.

Reviewing process. 5.1. Reviewing process follows these steps: ▪ § 1st Step: The Editor in Chief will make an initial screening of the paper submitted in order to determine if it is suitable with the scope and the aims of the journal. ▪ § 2nd Step: The submission received will be checked with the anti-plagiarism software before will undergo a double blind peer reviewing process. If the report indicates suspicious, the paper will be rejected, else will follows next stage. ▪ § 3rd Step: The paper is double-blind peer reviewed by the members of Editorial Advisory Board, according with the area of research indicated by the JEL Classification specified by the author in its paper. ▪ § 4th Step: The final decision is made by the Editor in Chief based on the recommendations and comments of reviewers. The Editor in Chief decides whether the paper should be accepted as it is, revised (with minor or major corrections) or rejected. Any changes which affecting the substance of the text will, of course, only be made in agreement with the author. The reviewing process usually takes between 3 and 6 weeks but sometimes, due to number of papers, complexity of research submitted could be up to 10 weeks. If the Reviewing process takes more than 10 weeks, the ‘Author’ could withdrawal the ‘Article’ without any claim from the ‘Publisher’.