Revision of Proposal. Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Proposer may withdraw or revise a proposal on the Proposer’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for submission of proposals. The Proposer must submit the revised proposal in the same manner as the original proposal. A revised proposal must be received on or before the proposal due date. In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised proposal or the commencement of a revision process extend the proposal due date for any Proposer. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal prior to the proposal submission deadline by following the prompts on the SFBid website. Once withdrawn, a Proposer may submit a revised proposal through SFBid ahead of the proposal deadline. At any time during the proposal evaluation process, the SFPUC may require a Proposer to provide oral or written clarification of its proposal. The SFPUC reserves the right to make an award without receiving or accepting any clarifications of proposals received. Errors and Omissions in Proposal Failure by the SFPUC to object to an error, omission, or deviation in the proposal will in no way modify the RFP or excuse the Proposer from full compliance with the specifications of the RFP or any Agreement awarded pursuant to the RFP. Financial Responsibility The SFPUC accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a Proposer in either responding to this RFP, participating in oral presentations, or negotiating an Agreement with the SFPUC. The proposals in response to the RFP will become the property of the SFPUC and may be used by the SFPUC in any way it deems appropriate. Proposer’s Obligations Under the Campaign Reform Ordinance Proposers must comply with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Code, which states: No person who contracts with the City and County of San Francisco for the rendition of personal services, for the furnishing of any material, supplies or equipment to the City, or for selling any land or building to the City, whenever such transaction would require approval by a City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves, shall make any contribution to such an officer, or candidates for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time between commencement of negotiations for such contract until (1) the termination of negotiations for such contract; or (2) three months have elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves. If a Proposer is negotiating for a contract that must be approved by an elected local officer or the board on which that officer serves, during the negotiation period the Proposer is prohibited from making contributions to: • The officer’s re-election campaign; • A candidate for that officer’s office; and • A committee controlled by the officer or candidate. The negotiation period begins with the first point of contact, either by telephone, in person, or in writing, when a Proposer approaches any City officer or employee about a particular contract, or a City officer or employee initiates communication with a potential Proposer about a contract. The negotiation period ends when a contract is awarded or not awarded to the Proposer. Examples of initial contacts include: (i) a vendor contacts a City officer or employee to promote himself or herself as a candidate for a contract; and (ii) a City officer or employee contacts a Proposer to propose that the Proposer apply for a contract. Inquiries for information about a particular contract, requests for documents relating to a RFP, and requests to be placed on a mailing list do not constitute negotiations. Violation of Section 1.126 may result in the following criminal, civil, or administrative penalties: • Criminal: Any person who knowingly or willfully violates Section 1.126 is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of not more than six months, or both.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Green E Verification Audit Agreement, Meter Maintenance Diagnostics Services Agreement
Revision of Proposal. Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Proposer A proposer may withdraw or revise a proposal on the Proposerproposer’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for submission of proposals. The Proposer proposer must submit the revised proposal in the same manner as the original proposaloriginal. A revised proposal must be received on or before the proposal due date. In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised proposal proposal, or the commencement of a revision process process, extend the proposal due date for any Proposer. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal prior to the proposal submission deadline by following the prompts on the SFBid website. Once withdrawn, a Proposer may submit a revised proposal through SFBid ahead of the proposal deadlineproposer. At any time during the proposal evaluation process, the SFPUC Department may require a Proposer proposer to provide oral or written clarification of its proposal. The SFPUC Department reserves the right to make an award without receiving or accepting any further clarifications of proposals received. Errors and Omissions in Proposal Failure by the SFPUC Department to object to an error, omission, or deviation in the proposal will in no way modify the RFP RFQ or excuse the Proposer vendor from full compliance with the specifications of the RFP or any Agreement contract awarded pursuant to the RFPRFQ. Financial Responsibility The SFPUC City accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a Proposer firm in either responding to this RFP, participating in oral presentations, or negotiating an Agreement with the SFPUC. The proposals in response to Submissions of the RFP will become the property of the SFPUC City and may be used by the SFPUC City in any way it deems deemed appropriate. Proposer’s Obligations Under the Campaign Reform Ordinance Proposers must comply with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, which states: No person who contracts with the City and County of San Francisco for the rendition of personal services, for the furnishing of any material, supplies or equipment to the City, or for selling any land or building to the City, whenever such transaction would require approval by a City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves, shall make any contribution to such an officer, or candidates for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time between commencement of negotiations for such contract until and the later of either (1) the termination of negotiations for such contract; , or (2) three months have elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, officer or the board on which that City elective officer serves. If a Proposer proposer is negotiating for a contract that must be approved by an elected local officer or the board on which that officer serves, during the negotiation period the Proposer proposer is prohibited from making contributions to: • The the officer’s re-election campaign; campaign • A a candidate for that officer’s office; and office • A a committee controlled by the officer or candidate. The negotiation period begins with the first point of contact, either by telephone, in person, or in writing, when a Proposer contractor approaches any City city officer or employee about a particular contract, or a City city officer or employee initiates communication with a potential Proposer contractor about a contract. The negotiation period ends when a contract is awarded or not awarded to the Proposercontractor. Examples of initial contacts include: (i1) a vendor contacts a City city officer or employee to promote himself or herself as a candidate for a contract; and (ii2) a City city officer or employee contacts a Proposer contractor to propose that the Proposer contractor apply for a contract. Inquiries for information about a particular contract, requests for documents relating to a RFPRequest for Proposal, and requests to be placed on a mailing list do not constitute negotiations. Violation of Section 1.126 may result in the following criminal, civil, or administrative penalties: • Criminal: . Any person who knowingly or willfully violates Section section 1.126 is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of not more than six months, or both.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Request for Qualifications
Revision of Proposal. Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Proposer may withdraw or revise a proposal on the Proposer’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for submission of proposals. The Proposer must submit the revised proposal in the same manner as the original proposal. A revised proposal must be received on or before the proposal due date. In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised proposal or the commencement of a revision process extend the proposal due date for any Proposer. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal prior to the proposal submission deadline by following the prompts on the SFBid website. Once withdrawn, a Proposer may submit a revised proposal through SFBid ahead of the proposal deadline. At any time during the proposal evaluation process, the SFPUC may require a Proposer to provide oral or written clarification of its proposal. The SFPUC reserves the right to make an award without receiving or accepting any clarifications of proposals received. Errors and Omissions in Proposal Failure by the SFPUC to object to an error, omission, or deviation in the proposal will in no way modify the RFP or excuse the Proposer from full compliance with the specifications of the RFP or any Agreement awarded pursuant to the RFP. Financial Responsibility The SFPUC accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a Proposer in either responding to this RFP, participating in oral presentations, or negotiating an Agreement with the SFPUC. The proposals in response to the RFP will become the property of the SFPUC and may be used by the SFPUC in any way it deems appropriate. Proposer’s Obligations Under the Campaign Reform Ordinance Proposers must comply with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Code, which states: No person who contracts with the City and County of San Francisco for the rendition of personal services, for the furnishing of any material, supplies or equipment to the City, or for selling any land or building to the City, whenever such transaction would require approval by a City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves, shall make any contribution to such an officer, or candidates for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time between commencement of negotiations for such contract until (1) the termination of negotiations for such contract; or (2) three months have elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves. If a Proposer is negotiating for a contract that must be approved by an elected local officer or the board on which that officer serves, during the negotiation period the Proposer is prohibited from making contributions to: • The officer’s re-election campaign; • A candidate for that officer’s office; and • A committee controlled by the officer or candidate. The negotiation period begins with the first point of contact, either by telephone, in person, or in writing, when a Proposer approaches any City officer or employee about a particular contract, or a City officer or employee initiates communication with a potential Proposer about a contract. The negotiation period ends when a contract is awarded or not awarded to the Proposer. Examples of initial contacts include: (i) a vendor contacts a City officer or employee to promote himself or herself as a candidate for a contract; and (ii) a City officer or employee contacts a Proposer to propose that the Proposer apply for a contract. Inquiries for information about a particular contract, requests for documents relating to a RFP, and requests to be placed on a mailing list do not constitute negotiations. Violation of Section 1.126 may result in the following criminal, civil, or administrative penalties: • Criminal: Any person who knowingly or willfully violates Section 1.126 is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of not more than six months, or both.:
Appears in 1 contract
Revision of Proposal. Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Proposer may withdraw or revise a proposal on the Proposer’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for submission of proposals. The Proposer must submit the revised proposal in the same manner as the original proposal. A revised proposal must be received on or before the proposal due date. In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised proposal or the commencement of a revision process extend the proposal due date for any Proposer. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal prior to the proposal submission deadline by following the prompts on the SFBid website. Once withdrawn, a Proposer may submit a revised proposal through SFBid ahead of the proposal deadline. At any time during the proposal evaluation process, the SFPUC may require a Proposer to provide oral or written clarification of its proposal. The SFPUC reserves the right to make an award without receiving or accepting any clarifications of proposals received. Errors and Omissions in Proposal Failure by the SFPUC to object to an error, omission, or deviation in the proposal will in no way modify the RFP or excuse the Proposer from full compliance with the specifications of the RFP or any Agreement awarded pursuant to the RFP. Financial Responsibility The SFPUC accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a Proposer in either responding to this RFP, participating in oral presentations, or negotiating an Agreement with the SFPUC. The proposals in response to the RFP will become the property of the SFPUC and may be used by the SFPUC in any way it deems appropriate. Proposer’s Obligations Under the Campaign Reform Ordinance Proposers must comply with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Code, which states: No person who contracts with the City and County of San Francisco for the rendition of personal services, for the furnishing of any material, supplies or equipment to the City, or for selling any land or building to the City, whenever such transaction would require approval by a City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves, shall make any contribution to such an officer, or candidates for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time between commencement of negotiations for such contract until (1) the termination of negotiations for such contract; or (2) three months have elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves. If a Proposer is negotiating for a contract that must be approved by an elected local officer or the board on which that officer serves, during the negotiation period the Proposer is prohibited from making contributions to: • The officer’s re-election campaign; • A candidate for that officer’s office; and • A committee controlled by the officer or candidate. The negotiation period begins with the first point of contact, either by telephone, in person, or in writing, when a Proposer approaches any City officer or employee about a particular contract, or a City officer or employee initiates communication with a potential Proposer about a contract. The negotiation period ends when a contract is awarded or not awarded to the Proposer. Examples of initial contacts include: (i1) a vendor contacts a City officer or employee to promote himself or herself as a candidate for a contract; and (ii2) a City officer or employee contacts a Proposer to propose that the Proposer apply for a contract. Inquiries for information about a particular contract, requests for documents relating to a RFP, and requests to be placed on a mailing list do not constitute negotiations. Violation of Section 1.126 may result in the following criminal, civil, or administrative penalties: • Criminal: Any person who knowingly or willfully violates Section 1.126 is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of not more than six months, or both.
Appears in 1 contract
Revision of Proposal. Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Proposer may withdraw or revise a proposal on the Proposer’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for proposal submission of proposalsdeadline. The Proposer must submit the revised proposal in the same manner as the original proposal. A revised proposal must be received on or before the proposal due datesubmission deadline. In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised proposal or the commencement of a revision process extend the proposal due date submission deadline for any Proposer. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal prior to the proposal submission deadline by following the prompts on the SFBid website. Once withdrawn, a Proposer may submit a revised proposal through SFBid ahead of the proposal submission deadline. At any time during the proposal evaluation process, the SFPUC may require a Proposer to provide oral or written clarification of its proposal. The SFPUC reserves the right to make an award without receiving or accepting any clarifications of proposals received. Errors and Omissions in Proposal Failure by the SFPUC to object to an error, omission, or deviation in the proposal will in no way modify the RFP or excuse the Proposer from full compliance with the specifications of the RFP or any Agreement awarded pursuant to the RFP. Financial Responsibility The SFPUC accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a Proposer in either responding to this RFP, participating in oral presentations, or negotiating an Agreement with the SFPUC. The proposals in response to the RFP will become the property of the SFPUC and may be used by the SFPUC in any way it deems appropriate. Proposer’s Obligations Under the Campaign Reform Ordinance Proposers must comply with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Code, which states: No person who contracts with the City and County of San Francisco for the rendition of personal services, for the furnishing of any material, supplies or equipment to the City, or for selling any land or building to the City, whenever such transaction would require approval by a City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves, shall make any contribution to such an officer, or candidates for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time between commencement of negotiations for such contract until (1) the termination of negotiations for such contract; or (2) three months have elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves. If a Proposer is negotiating for a contract that must be approved by an elected local officer or the board on which that officer serves, during the negotiation period the Proposer is prohibited from making contributions to: • The officer’s re-election campaign; • A candidate for that officer’s office; and • A committee controlled by the officer or candidate. The negotiation period begins with the first point of contact, either by telephone, in person, or in writing, when a Proposer approaches any City officer or employee about a particular contract, or a City officer or employee initiates communication with a potential Proposer about a contract. The negotiation period ends when a contract is awarded or not awarded to the Proposer. Examples of initial contacts include: (i1) a vendor contacts a City officer or employee to promote himself or herself as a candidate for a contract; and (ii2) a City officer or employee contacts a Proposer to propose that the Proposer apply for a contract. Inquiries for information about a particular contract, requests for documents relating to a RFP, and requests to be placed on a mailing list do not constitute negotiations. Violation of Section 1.126 may result in the following criminal, civil, or administrative penalties: • Criminal: Any person who knowingly or willfully violates Section 1.126 is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of not more than six months, or both.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Request for Proposals
Revision of Proposal. Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Proposer may withdraw or revise a proposal on the Proposer’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for submission of proposals. The Proposer must submit the revised proposal in the same manner as the original proposal. A revised proposal must be received on or before the proposal due date. In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised proposal or the commencement of a revision process extend the proposal due date for any Proposer. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal prior to the proposal submission deadline by following the prompts on the SFBid website. Once withdrawn, a Proposer may submit a revised proposal through SFBid ahead of the proposal deadline. At any time during the proposal evaluation process, the SFPUC may require a Proposer to provide oral or written clarification of its proposal. The SFPUC reserves the right to make an award without receiving or accepting any clarifications of proposals received. Errors and Omissions in Proposal Failure by the SFPUC to object to an error, omission, or deviation in the proposal will in no way modify the RFP or excuse the Proposer from full compliance with the specifications of the RFP or any Agreement awarded pursuant to the RFP. Financial Responsibility The SFPUC accepts no financial responsibility for any costs incurred by a Proposer in either responding to this RFP, participating in oral presentations, or negotiating an Agreement with the SFPUC. The proposals in response to the RFP will become the property of the SFPUC and may be used by the SFPUC in any way it deems appropriate. Proposer’s Obligations Under the Campaign Reform Ordinance Proposers must comply with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Code, which states: No person who contracts with the City and County of San Francisco for the rendition of personal services, for the furnishing of any material, supplies or equipment to the City, or for selling any land or building to the City, whenever such transaction would require approval by a City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves, shall make any contribution to such an officer, or candidates for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time between commencement of negotiations for such contract until (1) the termination of negotiations for such contract; or (2) three months have elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves. If a Proposer is negotiating for a contract that must be approved by an elected local officer or the board on which that officer serves, during the negotiation period the Proposer is prohibited from making contributions to: • The officer’s re-election campaign; • A candidate for that officer’s office; and • A committee controlled by the officer or candidate. The negotiation period begins with the first point of contact, either by telephone, in person, or in writing, when a Proposer approaches any City officer or employee about a particular contract, or a City officer or employee initiates communication with a potential Proposer about a contract. The negotiation period ends when a contract is awarded or not awarded to the Proposer. Examples of initial contacts include: (i) a vendor contacts a City officer or employee to promote himself or herself as a candidate for a contract; and (ii) a City officer or employee contacts a Proposer to propose that the Proposer apply for a contract. Inquiries for information about a particular contract, requests for documents relating to a RFP, and requests to be placed on a mailing list do not constitute negotiations. Violation of Section 1.126 may result in the following criminal, civil, or administrative penalties: • Criminal: Any person who knowingly or willfully violates Section 1.126 is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of not more than six months, or both.:
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Request for Proposals