Sanmina Corp. 12. Claas
Sanmina Corp Sample Clauses
Related to Sanmina Corp
Comverge Comverge hereby represents and warrants the following:
IBM Credit may in its sole discretion from time to time decide the amount of credit IBM Credit extends to Customer, notwithstanding any prior course of conduct between IBM Credit and Customer. IBM Credit may combine all of its advances to make one debt owed by Customer.
EMC On the Closing Date, EMC will receive from the Seller a payment of $5,000.
IMCO IMCO represents and warrants to MFS that (i) the retention of MFS by IMCO as contemplated by this Agreement is authorized by the respective governing documents of the Trust and IMCO; (ii) the execution, delivery and performance of each of this Agreement and the Investment Advisory Agreement does not violate any obligation by which the Trust or IMCO or their respective property is bound, whether arising by contract, operation of law or otherwise; (iii) each of this Agreement and the Investment Advisory Agreement has been duly authorized by appropriate action of the Trust and IMCO and when executed and delivered by IMCO will be a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Trust and IMCO, enforceable against the Trust and IMCO in accordance with its terms, subject, as to enforcement, to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and to general equitable principles (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or law); (iv) IMCO is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act; (v) IMCO has adopted a written code of ethics complying with the requirements of Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and that IMCO and certain of its employees, officers and directors are subject to reporting requirements thereunder; (vi) IMCO is not prohibited by the 1940 Act, the Advisers Act or other law, regulation or order from performing the services contemplated by this Agreement; and (vii) IMCO will promptly notify MFS of the occurrence of any event that would disqualify IMCO from serving as investment manager of an investment company pursuant to Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act or otherwise.
Cornerstone shall notify the LLC and confirm such advice in writing (i) when the filing of any post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement or supplement to the Prospectus is required, when the same is filed and, in the case of the Registration Statement and any post-effective amendment, when the same becomes effective, (ii) of any request by the Securities and Exchange Commission for any amendment of or supplement to the Registration Statement or the Prospectus or for additional information and (iii) of the entry of any stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement or the initiation or threatening of any proceedings for that purpose, and, if such stop order shall be entered, Cornerstone shall use its best efforts promptly to obtain the lifting thereof.
Residential Funding Corporation If Residential Funding Corporation is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to no longer be able to fulfill its obligations as REMIC Administrator under this Agreement the Master Servicer or Trustee acting as Master Servicer shall appoint a successor REMIC Administrator, subject to assumption of the REMIC Administrator obligations under this Agreement.
Name of the Company The name of the company to be stated in the Certificate and the limited liability company governed by this Agreement shall be "New-U Pictures Development LLC".
Supplier shall exercise reasonable care in carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, but shall be kept indemnified by, and shall be without liability to CMA and/or any Fund for any action taken or omitted by it in good faith without negligence including, without limitation, acting in accordance with any Proper Instruction. Supplier shall be entitled to rely on and may act upon the advice of counsel (who may be counsel for CMA or any Fund) on all matters arising in connection with the Services. At any time, Supplier may apply to any officer of CMA or a Fund for instructions and may consult with outside counsel for CMA or the applicable Fund or the independent auditors for the Fund at the expense of the Fund, or other individuals designated in writing by CMA or the Fund, for advice with respect to any matter arising in connection with the Services. Supplier shall not be liable, and shall be indemnified by each Fund or CMA, as applicable, for any action taken or omitted by it in good faith in reliance upon any such instructions or advice or upon any paper or document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed by such officers or individuals. Supplier shall not be held to have notice of any change of authority of any officer or individual until receipt of written notice thereof from the Fund or CMA. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as imposing upon Supplier any obligation to seek such instructions or advice. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, Supplier shall in no event be liable for any loss or damage arising from causes beyond its control including, without limitation, delay or cessation of services hereunder or any damages to CMA or a Fund resulting therefrom as a result of work stoppage, power or other mechanical failure, natural disaster, governmental action, communication disruption or other impossibility of performance.
Baxter and Nexell shall cooperate in any action taken by a third party solely involving a nullity action, opposition, reexamination or any other action taken by such third party alleging the invalidity or unenforceability of any Licensed Intellectual Property. Both parties agree to share equally in the cost of the defense of such Licensed Intellectual Property.
Xxxxxxxx Tobacco Co the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, found the plaintiff to be 30% at fault and RJR Tobacco to be 70% at fault, and awarded $9 million in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. For a detailed description of the above-described cases, see “— Xxxxx and Xxxxx Progeny Cases” below. In addition, since the end of the third quarter of 2013, jurors returned a verdict in the following Xxxxx Progeny case:
