Common use of Service Elections, Generally Clause in Contracts

Service Elections, Generally. All Large Facilities must interconnect in compliance with the NYISO Minimum Interconnection Standard. In addition, Large Facilities must also comply with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard before Large Generating Facilities can become qualified Installed Capacity Suppliers and before Class Year Transmission Projects can receive Unforced Capacity Deliverability Rights. A Developer initially states its election to be evaluated in its Interconnection Studies for ERIS alone, or for both ERIS and XXXX, as a part of its Interconnection Request. An existing Large Generating Facility requesting only XXXX must request XXXX in an Open Class Year Study unless it is requesting XXXX pursuant to Section 30.3.2.6 of this Attachment X. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Minimum Interconnection Standard throughout the Interconnection Study process. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Deliverability Interconnection Standard formally during the Class Year Deliverability Study. At other times during the Interconnection Study process, during the Optional Interconnection Feasibility Study and the Interconnection System Reliability Study, the ISO will assist any Developer considering Capacity Resource Interconnection Service to assess potential system deliverability issues by providing the Developer, upon its request, with the Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment case from the most recently completed Class Year Deliverability Study. The Developer may modify its interconnection service evaluation election when it executes the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study Agreement for its project in accordance with Section 30.8.1 of these Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. At that time, the Developer may reduce the number of MW it initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX, and such a reduction shall not constitute a Material Modification. Any increase in the MW initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX shall constitute a Material Modification.

Service Elections, Generally. All Large Facilities must interconnect in compliance with the NYISO Minimum Interconnection Standard. In addition, Large Facilities must also comply with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard before Large Generating Facilities can become qualified Installed Capacity Suppliers and before Class Year Transmission Projects can receive Unforced Capacity Deliverability Rights. A Developer initially states its election to be evaluated in its Interconnection Studies for ERIS alone, or for both ERIS and XXXX, as a part of its Interconnection Request. An existing Large Generating Facility requesting only XXXX must request XXXX in an Open Class Year Study or an Expedited Deliverability Study unless it is requesting XXXX pursuant to Section 30.3.2.6 of this Attachment X. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Minimum Interconnection Standard throughout the Interconnection Study process. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Deliverability Interconnection Standard formally during the Class Year Deliverability Study. At other times during the Interconnection Study process, during the Optional Interconnection Feasibility Study and the Interconnection System Reliability Study, the ISO will assist any Developer considering Capacity Resource Interconnection Service requesting XXXX to assess potential system deliverability issues by providing the Developer, upon its request, with the Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment case from the most recently completed Class Year Deliverability Study. The Developer may modify its interconnection service evaluation election when it executes the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study Agreement for its project in accordance with Section 30.8.1 of these Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. At that time, the Developer may reduce the number of MW it initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX, and such a reduction shall not constitute a Material Modification. Any increase in the MW initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX shall constitute a Material Modification.

Service Elections, Generally. All Large Facilities must interconnect in compliance with the NYISO Minimum Interconnection Standard. In addition, Large Facilities must also comply with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard before Large Generating Facilities can become qualified Installed Capacity Suppliers and before Class Year Transmission Projects can receive Unforced Capacity Deliverability Rights. A Developer initially states its election to be evaluated in its Interconnection Studies for ERIS alone, or for both ERIS and XXXX, as a part of its Interconnection Request. For Projects comprised of multiple Generators, a Developer must request a single ERIS value for the Large Facility and also specify the ERIS of the multiple Generators comprising the Large Facility as requested by Developer in its Interconnection Request. For projects comprised of multiple Generators, the total ERIS for the Large Facility may be less than the sum of the ERIS for the individual Generators. The requested ERIS of the individual Generators is subject to the following limitations: (1) the requested ERIS for the Energy Storage Resource in a Co-located Storage Resource or Hybrid Storage Resource cannot exceed the lesser of the Point of Injection limit or its nameplate; and (2) the requested ERIS for each Resource in a Co-located Storage Resource or Hybrid Storage Resource other than the Energy Storage Resource cannot exceed the lesser of (a) the Point of Injection limit plus the full withdrawal capability of the Energy Storage Resource or (b) the relevant Resource’s nameplate. An existing Large Generating Facility requesting only XXXX must request XXXX in an Open Class Year Study or an Expedited Deliverability Study unless it is requesting XXXX pursuant to Section 30.3.2.6 of this Attachment X. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Minimum Interconnection Standard throughout the Interconnection Study process. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Deliverability Interconnection Standard formally during the Class Year Deliverability Study. At other times during the Interconnection Study process, during the Optional Interconnection Feasibility Study and the Interconnection System Reliability Study, the ISO will assist any Developer considering Capacity Resource Interconnection Service requesting XXXX to assess potential system deliverability issues by providing the Developer, upon its request, with the Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment case from the most recently completed Class Year Deliverability Study. The Prior to entering a Class Year Study, the Developer may modify its interconnection service evaluation election (whether the Large Facility requests ERIS or ERIS and XXXX) and, for Large Facilities comprised of multiple Generators, the requested MW ERIS and or XXXX of any of its multiple units, to the extent the modification is not a Material Modification under Section 30.4.4 of this Attachment X to the OATT, when it executes submits the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study Agreement for its project in accordance with Section 30.8.1 of these Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. At that timePermissible modifications prior to entering a Class Year Study include modifying the requested ERIS and XXXX for individual Generators within the multi-unit facility being evaluated in the same Interconnection Request; provided however, the total requested ERIS and XXXX for the Interconnection Request may not increase. The Developer may can reduce the number of MW it initially requested to be evaluated for ERIS or XXXX, and such a reduction shall not constitute a Material Modification. Any increase in the MW initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX shall constitute a Material Modification.

Service Elections, Generally. All Large Facilities must interconnect in compliance with the NYISO Minimum Interconnection Standard. In addition, Large Facilities must also comply with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard before Large Generating Facilities can become qualified Installed Capacity Suppliers and before Class Year Transmission Projects can receive Unforced Capacity Deliverability Rights. A Developer initially states its election to be evaluated in its Interconnection Studies for ERIS alone, or for both ERIS and XXXX, as a part of its Interconnection Request. For Projects comprised of multiple Generators, a Developer must request ERIS for the Large Facility, such ERIS to be allocated among the multiple Generators comprising the Large Facility as requested by Developer in its Interconnection Request; provided however, the requested allocation for ERIS for the Intermittent Power Resource in a Co-located Storage Resource cannot exceed the Point of Injection limit plus the full withdrawal capability of the Energy Storage Resource. An existing Large Generating Facility requesting only XXXX must request XXXX in an Open Class Year Study or an Expedited Deliverability Study unless it is requesting XXXX pursuant to Section 30.3.2.6 of this Attachment X. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Minimum Interconnection Standard throughout the Interconnection Study process. The ISO evaluates an Interconnection Request for compliance with the Deliverability Interconnection Standard formally during the Class Year Deliverability Study. At other times during the Interconnection Study process, during the Optional Interconnection Feasibility Study and the Interconnection System Reliability Study, the ISO will assist any Developer considering Capacity Resource Interconnection Service requesting XXXX to assess potential system deliverability issues by providing the Developer, upon its request, with the Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment case from the most recently completed Class Year Deliverability Study. The Developer may modify its interconnection service evaluation election (whether the Large Facility requests ERIS or ERIS and XXXX) and, for Large Facilities comprised of multiple Generators, the requested allocation of ERIS and or XXXX among its multiple units, to the extent the modification is not a Material Modification, when it executes the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study Agreement for its project in accordance with Section 30.8.1 of these Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. At that time, the Developer may reduce the number of MW it initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX, and such a reduction shall not constitute a Material Modification. Any increase in the MW initially requested to be evaluated for XXXX shall constitute a Material Modification.