Sharing Results Sample Clauses
Sharing Results. No later than thirty (30) days after the observation and review, the College will share the results with the District Liaison and be available to discuss the results with the District Liaison, the High School Department Chair, and the Instructor.
Sharing Results. No later than thirty (30) days after the observation and review, the College will share the results with the District Liaison and be available to discuss the results with the District Liaison, the High School Department Chair, and the Instructor.
i. If the Dual Credit Course does not meet the required academic rigor, the College will inform the Dual Credit Instructor and District of the requirements not met. A plan of action may be determined to rectify the situation immediately.
1. Academic rigor is defined by the College’s Course Outline, student learning outcome assessments, the Illinois Community College Board (ICCB), the Illinois Articulation Initiative (IAI) for transfer-oriented courses, the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), and specialized Advisory Committees for career-oriented courses.
ii. A follow-up observation may be required to verify requested updates and changes.
iii. If the course still does not meet the academic rigor required, the College will suspend future enrollment in the course until requirements are met.
Sharing Results. 22.1. The actual gains achieved by the Concessionaire due to the reduction of the credit risk of the financing used by it shall be shared with the Granting Authority.
22.2. The portion of gains or financial income, addressed in sub-clause 22.1 above, destined for the Granting Authority, shall be twenty five percent (25%) and shall be used in the corresponding reduction of the Compensation to be paid to the Concessionaire.
Sharing Results. Coordination with partners is essential developing information systems that are understood, valued, and can be sustained by local actors. Promoters will work closely with health center staff, supervisors/coordinators with commune-level TPS, and senior project staff with district health officials to manage, analyze, and interpret data from the C-HIS and other sources of project information. In addition, the project will choose indicators and set up data systems in order that they be maximally compatible with community-level performance contracting implemented by HN-TPO. As described in the description of the M&E system above, promoters will give C-HIS to the supervisors, then supervisors will give to the data to the M&E Officer. In addition to CHWs sharing the data with the commune-level health promotion technicians, the CSP supervisors within each commune will be responsible for sharing the CHIS information with the HC centers in their commune. This will ensure that a CSP project staff person is following up with the district health system’s integration of the Care Group generated data. This would happen on a monthly basis, because the volunteers will be reporting this information on a monthly basis. Of course, any significant outbreaks (cholera, measles, meningitis or any other sudden health changes) will be shared with the promoters as they are in the communities working with Care Groups on a daily basis. The promoter would then be responsible for informing their supervisor and the HC in the project area. The M&E Officer will be compiling the data on a monthly basis, by preparing Quarterly C-HIS reports, so that the information can be shared with the district, provincial and national levels of the health system. These reports will be prepared in French as this is the language used at these levels of the government/health system. Across the board, information systems will adhere to the highest possible quality of indicator construction according to international standard definitions. Data will be aggregated and discussed at each level of the system: the Care Group, health center, commune, project office, and district (at quarterly coordination meetings). Hand tabulation using reporting templates will be used from Care Group to promoter, promoter to health center, health center to commune, and commune to project office. The project’s main office will compile a computerized database of all C-HIS data as well as process information on program activities, tra...
Sharing Results. CSH reserves the right to use at its sole discretion any and all data, research, publications, and stories submitted to CSH. Program and outcome data shall be collected and shared for the benefit of CSH, CNCS, and the community at large. This data shall be used for research, analysis, and/or program effectiveness. As the data is made available to the community, it will be subjected to all applicable requirements regarding privacy and confidentiality. Service Recipient agrees to share the results and findings of the Service Recipient Evaluation Plan freely with other agencies, the professional public, the general public and policymakers. In addition, CSH retains the right to announce subaward and share results on its website, in its annual report, and in the media. Service Recipient is responsible for coordinating with CSH before any findings from evaluation studies are shared with the general community. CSH reserves the right to pre-publication review thirty (30) days prior to submission for review of publication for any dissemination of findings. The Service Recipient must include this Section 21, Shared Results in any agreements with contracted service providers including direct services and evaluation.