Standard Methodology Sample Clauses

Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the Xxxxxx Service Area using the Methodology set forth in Article 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows: -------------------------------------------------------------- Risk Group Monthly Capitation Amounts September 1,1999 - August 31, 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------- TANF Adults $138.32 -------------------------------------------------------------- TANF Children $75.09 -------------------------------------------------------------- Expansion Children $90.48 -------------------------------------------------------------- Newborns $455.14 -------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Mandate Children $42.25 -------------------------------------------------------------- CHIP Phase I $77.26 -------------------------------------------------------------- Pregnant Women $546.69 -------------------------------------------------------------- Disabled/Blind Administration $14.00 --------------------------------------------------------------
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the Harrxx Xxxvice Area using the Methodology set forth in Article 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows:
Sample 1
Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the Dallas Service Area using the methodology set forth in 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RISK GROUP MONTHLY CAPITATION AMOUNTS SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 - AUGUST 31, 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TANF ADULTS $155.91 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TANF CHILDREN $68.09 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXPANSION CHILDREN $136.73 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEWBORNS $322.45 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL MANDATE CHILDREN $55.72 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHIP PHASE 1 $99.35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREGNANT WOMEN $646.38 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 Dallas Service Area Contract 107 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABLED/BLIND ADMINISTRATION $14.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample 1
Standard Methodology 
Sample 1

Related to Standard Methodology

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services.

  • Service Level Standards In addition to all other requirements in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Best Claims Practices & Estimating Guidelines, Vendor shall use reasonable and good faith efforts to meet the Service Level Standards set forth below.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Standard Operating Procedures Over approximately the past eight years, the Parties have been supplying select Products to one another for use in the operation of their respective businesses within the United States of America, Canada and Mexico. The Parties developed and been following certain standard operating procedures in connecting with, among other topics, forecasting, production planning, ordering, delivering and resolving claims on the Products supplied to one another (the “Current SOPs”). The Parties will be updating their respective business systems over the next six months, and the updates to these business systems will require the Parties to modify the Current SOPs. Once the Parties have completed the updates to the business systems and agreed on the necessary modifications to the Current SOPs, the Parties will sign a written amendment to this Agreement appending the updated standard operating procedures (the “Updated SOPs”). Until the Parties have signed a written amendment appending the Updated SOPs, the parties will continue to follow the Current SOPs. The Parties will comply with the applicable SOPs in connection with the purchase and sale of products identified in a Purchase Schedule. The Parties may add terms and conditions to, and amend the terms and conditions of, the SOP in a Purchase Schedule, but any additional and amended terms and conditions in a Purchase Schedule supplementing and modifying the SOP will only apply the specific products identified in that Purchase Schedule for its duration.

  • Underwriting Methodology The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan employs objective mathematical principles which relate the related Mortgagor's income, assets and liabilities to the proposed payment and such underwriting methodology does not rely on the extent of the related Mortgagor's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such credit extension. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan;

  • Service Levels Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the Service Levels the performance of which the Parties have agreed to measure. The Supplier shall monitor its performance of this Call Off Contract by reference to the relevant performance criteria for achieving the Service Levels shown in Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule (the Service Level Performance Criteria) and shall send the Customer a Performance Monitoring Report detailing the level of service which was achieved in accordance with the provisions of Part B (Performance Monitoring) of this Call Off Schedule. The Supplier shall, at all times, provide the Services in such a manner that the Service Levels Performance Measures are achieved. If the level of performance of the Supplier of any element of the provision by it of the Services during the Call Off Contract Period: is likely to or fails to meet any Service Level Performance Measure or is likely to cause or causes a Critical Service Failure to occur, the Supplier shall immediately notify the Customer in writing and the Customer, in its absolute discretion and without prejudice to any other of its rights howsoever arising including under Clause 12 of this Call Off Contract (Service Levels and Service Credits), may: require the Supplier to immediately take all remedial action that is reasonable to mitigate the impact on the Customer and to rectify or prevent a Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure from taking place or recurring; and if the action taken under paragraph (a) above has not already prevented or remedied the Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure, the Customer shall be entitled to instruct the Supplier to comply with the Rectification Plan Process; or if a Service Level Failure has occurred, deduct from the Call Off Contract Charges the applicable Service Level Credits payable by the Supplier to the Customer in accordance with the calculation formula set out in Annex 1 of this Part A of this Call Off Schedule; or if a Critical Service Level Failure has occurred, exercise its right to Compensation for Critical Service Level Failure in accordance with Clause 13 of this Call Off Contract (Critical Service Level Failure) (including subject, for the avoidance of doubt, the proviso in Clause 13.1.2 of this Call Off Contract in relation to Material Breach). Approval and implementation by the Customer of any Rectification Plan shall not relieve the Supplier of any continuing responsibility to achieve the Service Levels, or remedy any failure to do so, and no estoppels or waiver shall arise from any such Approval and/or implementation by the Customer. SERVICE CREDITS Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the formula used to calculate a Service Credit payable to the Customer as a result of a Service Level Failure in a given service period which, for the purpose of this Call Off Schedule, shall be a recurrent period of [one Month] during the Call Off Contract Period (the Service Period).

  • Service Level In the event that League InfoSight discovers or is notified by you of the existence of Non-Scheduled Downtime, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine the source of the problem and attempt to resolve it as quickly as possible.

  • SERVICE LEVEL DESCRIPTION The Fund Accounting Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the Service Level Description attached thereto and replacing it in its entirety with the Service Level Description attached hereto.

  • Escalation Procedures 48.1 The Standard Practices outlines the escalation process which may be invoked at any point in the Service Ordering, Provisioning, and Maintenance processes to facilitate rapid and timely resolution of disputes.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.