Standard Methodology Sample Clauses

Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the El Paso Service Area using the methodology set forth in Article 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------- Risk Group December 1, 1999 - August 31, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------- TANF Adults $150.27 ------------------------------------------------------------- TANF Children $ 66.93 ------------------------------------------------------------- Expansion Children $ 83.66 ------------------------------------------------------------- Newborns $317.14 ------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Mandate Children $ 43.21 ------------------------------------------------------------- CHIP $ 85.35 ------------------------------------------------------------- Pregnant Women $531.65 ------------------------------------------------------------- Disabled/Blind $ 14.00 Administration ------------------------------------------------------------- El Paso Service Area HMO Contract
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the Xxxxxx Service Area using the Methodology set forth in Article 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows: -------------------------------------------------------------- Risk Group Monthly Capitation Amounts September 1,1999 - August 31, 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------- TANF Adults $138.32 -------------------------------------------------------------- TANF Children $75.09 -------------------------------------------------------------- Expansion Children $90.48 -------------------------------------------------------------- Newborns $455.14 -------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Mandate Children $42.25 -------------------------------------------------------------- CHIP Phase I $77.26 -------------------------------------------------------------- Pregnant Women $546.69 -------------------------------------------------------------- Disabled/Blind Administration $14.00 -------------------------------------------------------------- 13.1.4 TDH will re-examine the capitation rates paid to HMO under this contract during the first year of the contract period and will provide HMO with capitation rates for the second year of the contract period no later than 30 days before the date of the one-year anniversary of the contract's effective date. Capitation rates for state fiscal year 2001 will be re-examined based on the most recent available traditional Medicaid cost data for the contracted risk groups in the service area, trended forward and discounted. 13.1.4.1 Once HMO has received their capitation rates established by TDH for the second year of this contract, HMO may terminate this contract as provided in Article 18.1.6 of this contract. HMO may also terminate this contract as provided in Article 18.
Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the Harrxx Xxxvice Area using the Methodology set forth in Article 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows:
Standard Methodology. If the DSP methodology is not approved by HCFA, the monthly capitation amounts established for each risk group in the Dallas Service Area using the methodology set forth in 13.1.1, without the DSP, are as follows: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RISK GROUP MONTHLY CAPITATION AMOUNTS SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 - AUGUST 31, 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TANF ADULTS $155.91 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TANF CHILDREN $68.09 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXPANSION CHILDREN $136.73 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEWBORNS $322.45 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL MANDATE CHILDREN $55.72 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHIP PHASE 1 $99.35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREGNANT WOMEN $646.38 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 Dallas Service Area Contract 107 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABLED/BLIND ADMINISTRATION $14.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Methodology 

Related to Standard Methodology

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Payment Methodology The Contractor shall be compensated based on the Service Rates in Attachment for units of service authorized by the Institution in a total amount not to exceed the Contract Maximum Liability established in Section C. 1. The Contractor’s compensation shall be contingent upon the satisfactory completion of units of service or project milestones identified in Attachment B. The Contractor shall submit invoices, in form and substance acceptable to the Institution with all of the necessary supporting documentation, prior to any payment. Such invoices shall be submitted for completed units of service or project milestones for the amount stipulated.

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services. 1.3.2 To fulfill this Agreement, Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into equipment or property leases with Party A or any other party designated by Party A which shall permit Party B to use Party A’s relevant equipment or property based on the needs of the business of Party B. 1.3.3 Party B hereby grants to Party A an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase from Party B, at Party A’s sole discretion, any or all of the assets and business of Party B, to the extent permitted under PRC law, at the lowest purchase price permitted by PRC law. The Parties shall then enter into a separate assets or business transfer agreement, specifying the terms and conditions of the transfer of the assets.

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Service Level Standards In addition to all other requirements in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Best Claims Practices & Estimating Guidelines, Vendor shall use reasonable and good faith efforts to meet the Service Level Standards set forth below.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedures shall not contravene the Canada Labour Code, the Canadian Human Rights Code, or the Collective Agreement, and an allegation of such contravention is subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Underwriting Methodology The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan employs objective mathematical principles which relate the related Mortgagor's income, assets and liabilities to the proposed payment and such underwriting methodology does not rely on the extent of the related Mortgagor's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such credit extension. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan;

  • Service Levels All service level requirements will be set forth in Exhibit A (“XXXX.xxx Referral Service Level Requirements”). Recipient Xxxxxx agrees to adhere, and encourage Recipient Agent’s adherence, with the version of the XXXX.xxx Referral Service Level Requirements in effect at the time XXXX.xxx identifies the Referral to Recipient Broker/Agent.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!