STANDING STRUCTURES. 1. Above-ground repair or retrofit of buildings less than forty-five (45)-years old (construction date as noted in the project documentation, or by the Recipient or subrecipient, or by a photograph/site visit).
STANDING STRUCTURES. The lead Federal agency will evaluate campuses or school facilities constructed before 1964 to determine if they are eligible for the NRHP under Criteria A, B, or C as described at 36 CFR §60.4. This assessment will be based on information included within the Historic Context. As part of an evaluation, the lead Federal agency will determine if an individual school facility or a campus is contributing or non-contributing to a NRHP eligible property including any existing NRHP Historic District.
STANDING STRUCTURES. The lead Federal agency will forward its determination regarding the NRHP eligibility of campuses or school facilities that it has evaluated to SHPO for a 15-day review. It will also forward any site specific background information that is not included in the Historic Context. If SHPO does not object to the lead Federal agency’s determination within 15-days, the lead Federal agency may proceed to the next step in the review.
STANDING STRUCTURES. If SHPO/THPO or Tribes or any consulting party objects to the finding of “no adverse effect” for a proposed undertaking on a standing structure FEMA may request through GOHSEP that the Applicant revise the scope of work to conform to the Standards. FEMA also shall ensure that the revised scope of work is reviewed for funding eligibility. If the scope of work is modified to address the objections to the satisfaction of FEMA, FEMA shall consult with SHPO/THPO, Tribes, and any consulting parties, and provide relevant documentation. Unless SHPO/THPO, Tribes, or any consulting party objects within 15 days after receipt, FEMA shall proceed with funding the undertaking assuming concurrence with its “No Adverse Effect” determination. b. Archaeological Sites and/or Traditional Cultural Properties: If SHPO/THPO or Tribes or any consulting party objects to the finding of “no adverse effect” for a proposed undertaking on an archaeological site or traditional cultural property, FEMA may request that the Applicant identify feasible alternatives to the undertaking. FEMA shall ensure that such alternatives are reviewed for funding eligibility. FEMA shall consult with SHPO/THPO, Tribes, GOHSEP, and any consulting parties, to review the Applicant’s alternatives. If the scope of work is modified to avoid or minimize adverse effects to the archaeological site or traditional cultural property to the satisfaction of FEMA, FEMA shall consult with SHPO/THPO, Tribes and any consulting party on the revised scope of work and provide relevant documentation. Unless SHPO/THPO, Tribes, or any consulting party objects within 15 days after receipt, FEMA shall proceed with funding the undertaking assuming concurrence with its “No Adverse Effect” determination. 2. If SHPO/THPO, a Tribe, or other consulting party objects to FEMA’s “no adverse effect” determination and upon FEMA’s reexamination of information provided by the objecting party, FEMA agrees that the undertaking will have an adverse effect, FEMA shall initiate consultation to resolve the adverse effect in accordance with Stipulation IX. 3. If an undertaking cannot be modified to address objections to FEMA’s “no adverse effect” determination, FEMA shall initiate consultation to resolve the adverse effect in accordance with Stipulation IX. IX.
