State Determinations Sample Clauses

State Determinations. Subscribing Organization acknowledges that each state determines whether Authorized Users may access or utilize the state’s PMP Data through the Gateway Service. Subscribing Organization agrees to provide the required information, affirmations, and agreements to Service Provider and/or the applicable state(s) so that the state(s) may make such determinations. Service Provider will provide any information it receives under this Section 3.3 to the applicable state(s). Further, the authorization granted by Service Provider when directed by a state PMP to enable Authorized Users to access or use the Gateway Service or Service Information does not constitute an endorsement by Service Provider or its licensors of such Entities or Users, or the services or products provided by such Entities or Users including, but not limited to, medical services, pharmacy services, or quality of care.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
State Determinations. Healthcare Entity shall ensure that only Authorized Users may access or utilize the state’s PMP Data through the Gateway Service. Healthcare Entity agrees to provide such information as may be reasonably requested by Service Provider and/or the Department to verify that a user of the Gateway Service is an Authorized User. Further, the authorization granted by Service Provider when directed by a state PMP to enable Authorized Users to access or use the Gateway Service or Service Information does not constitute an endorsement by Service Provider or its licensors of such entities or users, or the services or products provided by such Entities or Users including, but not limited to, medical services, pharmacy services, or quality of care.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
State Determinations. Healthcare Entity shall ensure that only Authorized Users may access or utilize the state’s PMP Data through the Gateway Service. Healthcare Entity agrees to provide the required information, affirmations, and agreements to Service Provider and/or the Department upon request. Further, the authorization granted by Service Provider when directed by a state PMP to enable Authorized Users to access or use the Gateway Service or Service Information does not constitute an endorsement by Service Provider or its licensors of such Entities or Users, or the services or products provided by such Entities or Users including, but not limited to, medical services, pharmacy services, or quality of care. The Department reserves the right to disable access for an Authorized User or any other individual. The Healthcare Entity shall disable access for any Authorized User or any other individual immediately upon written notification by the Department.
Sample 1Sample 2
State Determinations. Licensee acknowledges that each state determines whether Authorized Entities or Authorized Users may access or utilize the state’s PMP Data through the Gateway Service. Licensee agrees to provide the required information, affirmations, and agreements to Appriss and/or the applicable state(s) so that the state(s) may make such determinations. Appriss may provide any information it receives under this Section 2.3 to the applicable state(s). Further, the authorization granted by Appriss when directed by a state PMP to enable Authorized Entities or Authorized Users to access or use the Gateway Service or Service Information does not constitute an endorsement by Appriss or its licensors of such Entities or Users, or the services or products provided by such Entities or Users including, but not limited to, medical services, pharmacy services, or quality of care.
Sample 1

Related to State Determinations

  • INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION 6.1 By signing and submitting this bid, the Bidder certifies that the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other Bidder or with any competitor; unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the Bidder prior to bid opening directly or indirectly to any other Bidder or to any competitor; no attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Bidder to induce any person or firm to submit, or not to submit, a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

  • Expert Determination If a Dispute relates to any aspect of the technology underlying the provision of the Goods and/or Services or otherwise relates to a financial technical or other aspect of a technical nature (as the Parties may agree) and the Dispute has not been resolved by discussion or mediation, then either Party may request (which request will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) by written notice to the other that the Dispute is referred to an Expert for determination. The Expert shall be appointed by agreement in writing between the Parties, but in the event of a failure to agree within ten (10) Working Days, or if the person appointed is unable or unwilling to act, the Expert shall be appointed on the instructions of the relevant professional body. The Expert shall act on the following basis: he/she shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator and shall act fairly and impartially; the Expert's determination shall (in the absence of a material failure to follow the agreed procedures) be final and binding on the Parties; the Expert shall decide the procedure to be followed in the determination and shall be requested to make his/her determination within thirty (30) Working Days of his appointment or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter and the Parties shall assist and provide the documentation that the Expert requires for the purpose of the determination; any amount payable by one Party to another as a result of the Expert's determination shall be due and payable within twenty (20) Working Days of the Expert's determination being notified to the Parties; the process shall be conducted in private and shall be confidential; and the Expert shall determine how and by whom the costs of the determination, including his/her fees and expenses, are to be paid.

  • Tax and Flood Determination Fees Lender may require Borrower to pay (i) a one-time charge for a real estate tax verification and/or reporting service used by Lender in connection with this Loan, and (ii) either (A) a one-time charge for flood zone determination, certification, and tracking services, or (B) a one-time charge for flood zone determination and certification services and subsequent charges each time remappings or similar changes occur that reasonably might affect such determination or certification. Xxxxxxxx will also be responsible for the payment of any fees imposed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or any successor agency, at any time during the Loan term, in connection with any flood zone determinations.

  • Interest determination (a) Where Screen Rate Determination is specified in the applicable Final Terms as the manner in which the Rate of Interest is to be determined, the Rate of Interest for each Interest Period will, subject as provided below, be either:

  • Reviewing your bill (a) If you disagree with the amount you have been charged, you can ask us to review your bill in accordance with our standard complaints and dispute resolution procedures.

  • Final Determination His/her determination is final unless, within ten (10) days after notification, a recognized employee organization requests in writing to meet and confer thereon.

  • CERTIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION By submission of this bid, the Bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, that in connection with this procurement:

  • OPINIONS AND DETERMINATIONS Where the terms of this Contract provide for action to be based upon opinion, judgment, approval, review, or determination of either party hereto, such terms are not intended to be and shall never be construed as permitting such opinion, judgment, approval, review, or determination to be arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.

  • Penalty Determination H&SC section 39619.7 requires CARB to provide information on the basis for the penalties it seeks. This Agreement includes this information, which is also summarized here. The provision of law the penalty is being assessed under and why that provision is most appropriate for that violation. The penalty provision being applied in this case is H&SC section 42402 et seq. because IIT sold, supplied, offered for sale, consumer products for commerce in California in violation of the Consumer Products Regulations (17 CCR section 94507 et seq.). The penalty provisions of H&SC section 42402 et seq. apply to violations of the Consumer Products Regulations because the regulations were adopted under authority of H&SC section 41712, which is in Part 4 of Division 26. The manner in which the penalty amount was determined, including aggravating and mitigating factors and per unit or per vehicle basis for the penalty. H&SC section 42402 et seq. provides strict liability penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations of the Consumer Product Regulations with each day being a separate violation. In cases like this, involving unintentional violations of the Consumer Products Regulations where the violator cooperates with the investigation, CARB has obtained penalties for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. In this case, the total penalty is $7,500 for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. The penalty in this case was reduced because this was a strict liability first-time violation and IIT made diligent efforts to cooperate with the investigation. To come into compliance, IIT no longer offers Safegel BBQ & Fireplace Lighting Gel Fire Starter for commerce in California. Final penalties were determined based on the unique circumstances of this matter, considered together with the need to remove any economic benefit from noncompliance, the goal of deterring future violations and obtaining swift compliance, the consideration of past penalties in similar negotiated cases, and the potential cost and risk associated with litigating these particular violations. The penalty reflects violations extending over a number of days resulting in quantifiable harm to the environment considered together with the complete circumstances of this case. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger on a per ton basis. The final penalty in this case was based in part on confidential financial information or confidential business information provided by IIT that is not retained by CARB in the ordinary course of business. The penalty in this case was also based on confidential settlement communications between CARB and IIT that CARB does not retain in the ordinary course of business. The penalty also reflects CARB’s assessment of the relative strength of its case against IIT, the desire to avoid the uncertainty, burden and expense of litigation, obtain swift compliance with the law and remove any unfair advantage that IIT may have secured from its actions. Is the penalty being assessed under a provision of law that prohibits the emission of pollution at a specified level, and, if so a quantification of excess emissions, if it is practicable to do so. The Consumer Product Regulations do not prohibit emissions above a specified level, but they do limit the concentration of VOCs in regulated products. In this case, a quantification of the excess emissions attributable to the violations was not practicable.

  • Calculations and determinations The Calculation Agent shall in respect of each Series of Notes in relation to which it is appointed as such:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!