Common use of State-Subdivision Enforcement Clause in Contracts

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that (i) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Participating Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this the Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights except: (a1) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation allocation; or (b2) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, as to allegations that that: (ia) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (iib) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.bsubsection VI.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory territory: (a1) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b2) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, as to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies by Participating Subdivisions listed on Exhibit G were not used for purposes uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change change, or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Participating Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this the Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights except: (a1) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation allocation; or (b2) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, as to allegations that that: (ia) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (iib) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.bsubsection VIII.F.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory territory: (a1) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b2) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, as to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies by Participating Subdivisions listed on Exhibit G were not used for purposes uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change change, or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that (i) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in 6WDWH¶V XVH RI $EDWHPHQW $FFRXQWV )XQG PRQ the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes 6XEGLYLVLRQV¶ XVHV RI $EDWHPHQWpurpo$seFs FRXQWV ) similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-State- Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that (i) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between the Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation allocation; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to address allegations that (i) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; , or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to address allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. ‌ 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that (i) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Remediation Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. ‌ 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that (i) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Participating Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this the Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights except: (a1) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation allocation; or (b2) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, as to allegations that that: (ia) the Settling State’s use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (iib) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.bsubsection VIII.F.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory territory: (a1) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b2) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, as to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies by Participating Subdivisions listed on Exhibit G were not used for purposes uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.

State-Subdivision Enforcement. 1. A Subdivision shall not have enforcement rights against a Settling State in which it is located with respect to this Agreement or any Consent Judgment except that a Participating Subdivision listed on Exhibit G shall have enforcement rights (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust with respect to intrastate allocation or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that (i) the Settling State’s 's use of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for uses similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E; or (ii) a Settling State failed to pay funds directly from the Abatement Accounts Fund to a Participating Subdivision eligible to receive a block grant pursuant to Section V.E.2.b. 2. A Settling State shall have enforcement rights against a Participating Subdivision located in its territory (a) as provided for in a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust; or (b) in the absence of a State-Subdivision Agreement, Allocation Statute, or Statutory Trust, to allegations that the Participating Subdivisions’ ' uses of Abatement Accounts Fund monies were not used for purposes similar to or in the nature of those uses contained in Exhibit E. 3. As between Settling States and Participating Subdivisions, the above rights are contractual in nature and nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict, change or alter any other existing rights under law.