Structure of the agreement between Norfolk Southern and Delaware Sample Clauses

Structure of the agreement between Norfolk Southern and Delaware. The agreement between the state and Norfolk Southern was signed on May 3, 2002.10 It does not appear to have involved any detailed analysis of expected future traffic. Rather, it was based on recovering most of the state’s costs over a 20-year period if traffic over the bridge returned to pre-1994 levels. In addition to providing for reconstruction of the Shellpot Bridge, the agreement also gave Delaware the right to operate passenger trains over any NS track in Delaware “without further rent or user fees”. The state has for several years been studying the feasibility of operating passenger trains between Dover, the state 10 “Railroad Facilities Improvement and Revenue Participation Agreement”, executed by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx XXX, Secretary of Transportation, State of Delaware, and H. Xxxxx Xxxxx, Vice President, Norfolk Southern Corp., May 3, 2002. capital and Wilmington, the largest city. The Shellpot agreement gives the state authority to do this. The agreement was crafted to both protect the state’s interest and to encourage NS to use the bridge. It specified a minimum annual payment by NS, whether or not the bridge was used, that would have been nearly enough to return the state’s original $4.75 million investment. This minimum annual charge is shown in Table 2. Years 1 through 5 $150,000 $750,000 Years 6 through 10 $200,000 $1,000,000 Years 11 through 15 $250,000 $1,250,000 Years 16 through 20 $300,000 $1,500,000 Total Payments over 20 Years $4,500,000 Of course, the minimum payment would not have been nearly adequate to recover the $13.9 million actually spent by the state. However, the agreement was structured to require a high initial per-car payment by NS, with the payment declining as the volume of cars increased. This, the state hoped, would give NS an incentive to move an increasing number of cars over the bridge and increase the probability of a positive return to the state. The schedule of payments per car is shown in Table 3. The first column shows the originally agreed payment schedule. However, the contract provided that, should the state’s contribution increase, so would the payment by NS. The adjusted per-car charges reflect amounts NS pays as of 2005. Up to 5,000 $35.00 $ 48.03 5,000 to 20,000 $20.00 $ 27.45 20,000 to 35,000 $15.00 $ 20.58 35,000 to 50,000 $10.00 $ 13.72 More than 50,000 $5.00 $ 6.86 Note: Rates based on final state cost of $13,919,820.40 and agreed to by NS. The agreement is structured so that NS pays the greater of either...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Structure of the agreement between Norfolk Southern and Delaware

  • PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT ‌ The parties to the Agreement (hereinafter "Party" or "Parties") are: 1. PDL International Pte Ltd NEPTUNE PACIFIC DIRECT LINE PTE. LTD. ("PDL NPDL") 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, #03-00,PIL Building 8 Xxxxxx Road, #03-01 Singapore Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, 000000 228095 2. Pacific Forum Line (Group) Limited ("PFLG") X.X. Xxx 000, 0xx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Lini Highway Port Vila Vanuatu

  • Construction of the Agreement The Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between two sophisticated business entities with legal counsel as to its subject and supersedes all prior agreements, conditions, warranties, representations, arrangements and communications, including purchase orders issued by Client, whether oral or written, and whether with or by Accenture, any of its affiliates, or any of their employees, officers, directors, agents or shareholders. Each party acknowledges that it entered into the Agreement solely based on the agreements and representations contained herein, and has not relied upon any representations, warranties, promises, or inducements of any kind, whether oral or written, and from any source. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds any term of the Agreement to be invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such term or provision will not affect the other terms of this Agreement and will be deemed modified to the extent necessary, in the court’s opinion, to render such term enforceable while preserving to the fullest extent permissible the intent and agreements of the parties set forth in this Agreement. No waiver or modification of any provision of the Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party against which it is sought to be enforced. The delay or failure by either party to exercise or enforce any of its rights under this Agreement is not a waiver of that party’s right to later enforce those rights, nor will any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any other or further exercise of these rights or any other right. There are no third-party beneficiaries to the Agreement. In the event of a conflict between these GTC and an Order Form, the Order Form controls for purposes of that Order Form only.

  • Termination of the Agreement In the event of failure by the participant to perform any of the obligations arising from the agreement, and regardless of the consequences provided for under the applicable law, the institution is legally entitled to terminate or cancel the agreement without any further legal formality where no action is taken by the participant within one month of receiving notification by registered letter. If the participant terminates the agreement before its agreement ends or if he/she fails to follow the agreement in accordance with the rules, he/she shall have to refund the amount of the grant already paid, except if agreed differently with the sending organisation. In case of termination by the participant due to "force majeure", i.e. an unforeseeable exceptional situation or event beyond the participant's control and not attributable to error or negligence on his/her part, the participant shall be entitled to receive at least the amount of the grant corresponding to the actual duration of the mobility period. Any remaining funds shall have to be refunded, except if agreed differently with the sending organisation.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!