Subsidiary Grant Agreement Institutional and Other Arrangements
Subsidiary Grant Agreement Institutional and Other Arrangements Sample Clauses
Related to Subsidiary Grant Agreement Institutional and Other Arrangements
Institutional and Other Arrangements A. Institutional Arrangements
Order Arrangements Customer may place orders with HPE through our website, customer-specific portal, or by letter, fax or e-mail. Where appropriate, orders must specify a service delivery date. If Customer extends the service delivery date of an existing Order beyond ninety (90) days, then it will be considered a new order.
Transfer Arrangements An employee who is displaced from his/her job by virtue of technological change or new method of operation will be given the opportunity to fill other vacancies according to seniority, ability and qualifications.
Other Arrangements Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to prevent or inhibit other arrangements or practices of any party state or states to facilitate the interchange of educational personnel.
Financial Security Arrangements At least 20 Business Days prior to the commencement of the design, procurement, installation, or construction of a discrete portion of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and Upgrades, the Interconnection Customer shall provide the Connecting Transmission Owner, at the Interconnection Customer’s option, a guarantee, a surety bond, letter of credit or other form of security that is reasonably acceptable to the Connecting Transmission Owner and is consistent with the Uniform Commercial Code of the jurisdiction where the Point of Interconnection is located. Such security for payment shall be in an amount sufficient to cover the costs for constructing, designing, procuring, and installing the applicable portion of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and Upgrades and shall be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis for payments made to the Connecting Transmission Owner under this Agreement during its term. The Connecting Transmission Owner may draw on any such security to the extent that the Interconnection Customer fails to make any payments due under this Agreement. In addition:
LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject: Agreement between the European Union and the government of the Republic of Turkey on certain aspects of Air Services 18268/11 DG C I C KSM/kst EN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY ON CERTAIN ASPECTS OF AIR SERVICES THE EUROPEAN UNION, (hereinafter "the Union") of the one part, and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY (hereinafter "Turkey") of the other part (hereinafter "the Parties"), HAVING REGARD to Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963 on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union, which constitute the legal basis of Turkey's association with the EU, HAVING REGARD to the adoption at the Luxembourg Intergovernmental Conference of 3 October 2005 of the Negotiating Framework and in particular Articles 1, 2 and 6 thereof, HAVING REGARD to Council Decision 2008/157/EC of 18 February 2008 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with the Republic of Turkey and the 2008 National Programme of Turkey for the Adoption of the EU Acquis in which Turkey accepts and is prepared to implement the full "Acquis" in relation to air transport matters upon accession to the EU, NOTING that, until such accession, this Agreement will open the way towards Turkey's participation in Union civil aviation projects, in particular the Single European Sky, in order to assist Turkey in the adoption of the "Acquis", NOTING that the European Court of Justice has found that certain provisions of bilateral air services agreements concluded between several Member States of the Union and third countries are incompatible with Union law, NOTING that bilateral air services agreements concluded between several Member States of the Union and Turkey contain similar provisions and that there is an obligation on Member States to take all appropriate steps to eliminate incompatibilities between such agreements and Union law, NOTING that the Union has exclusive competence with respect to several aspects that may be included in bilateral air services agreements between Member States of the Union and third countries, NOTING that under Union law Community air carriers established in a Member State have the right to non-discriminatory access to air routes between the Member States of the Union and third countries, HAVING REGARD to the agreements between the Union and certain third countries providing for the possibility for the nationals of such third countries to acquire ownership in air carriers licensed in accordance with Union law, RECOGNISING that consistency between Union law and the provisions of the bilateral air services agreements between Member States of the Union and Turkey will provide a sound legal basis for air services between the Union and Turkey and preserve the continuity of such air services, NOTING that under Union law air carriers may not, in principle, conclude agreements which may affect trade between Member States of the Union and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition, RECOGNISING that provisions in bilateral air services agreements concluded between Member States of the Union and Turkey which i) require or favour the adoption of agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings or concerted practices that prevent, distort or restrict competition between air carriers on the relevant routes; or ii) reinforce the effects of any such agreement, decision or concerted practice; or iii) delegate to air carriers or other private economic operators the responsibility for taking measures that prevent, distort or restrict competition between air carriers on the relevant routes may render ineffective the competition rules applicable to undertakings, NOTING that it is not a purpose of the Union, as part of these negotiations, to increase the total volume of air traffic between the Union and Turkey, to affect the balance between Community air carriers and air carriers of Turkey, or to negotiate amendments to the provisions of existing bilateral air services agreements concerning traffic rights, NOTING that nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to confer on the air carrier of a Designating Member State the privilege of taking advantage of unused frequencies between Turkey and other Member States before the procedures regarding designation have been duly completed between the designating Member State and Turkey, NOTING that the principle of fair and equal opportunity laid down in the relevant bilateral Air Services Agreements for Turkish and Community air carriers will be fully respected, HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
SPECIAL AGREEMENTS The following special arrangements have been made: City, Date City, Date Seller's signature Buyer's signature
Alternate 911 Arrangements If you are not comfortable with the limitations of the 911 Dialing service, you should consider having an alternate means of accessing traditional 911 or E911 services or terminating the Service.
Management Arrangements 9.1. The Management Arrangements set out the arrangements for the strategic management of the relationship between the Authority and the Contractor, including arrangements for monitoring of the Contractor’s compliance with the Statement of Requirements, the Service Levels, the Award Procedures and the terms of this Framework Agreement.
Security Arrangements Infrastructure security of electric system equipment and operations and control hardware and software is essential to ensure day-to-day reliability and operational security. FERC expects the NYISO, the Connecting Transmission Owner, Market Participants, and Interconnection Customers interconnected to electric systems to comply with the recommendations offered by the President’s Critical Infrastructure Protection Board and, eventually, best practice recommendations from the electric reliability authority. All public utilities are expected to meet basic standards for system infrastructure and operational security, including physical, operational, and cyber-security practices.
