Substantive Matters. We accept the Western Farmers Agreement, as discussed below. We find that the proposed revisions to the Western Farmers Agreement conform to SPP’s pro forma NITSA and that the non-conforming terms and conditions previously accepted by the Commission were not directly challenged by Western Farmers.14 We also find that the issues raised in Western Farmers’ comments are the subject of the pending Complaint proceeding in Docket No. EL19-93-000, and the Commission will consider those issues in that proceeding.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement, Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement
Substantive Matters. We accept the Western Farmers Agreement, as discussed below. We find that the proposed revisions to the Western Farmers Agreement conform to SPP’s pro forma NITSA and that the non-conforming terms and conditions were previously accepted by the Commission were and are not directly challenged by Western Farmers.14 Farmers.22 We also find that the issues raised in Western Farmers’ comments are the subject of the pending Complaint proceeding in Docket No. EL19-93-000, and the Commission will consider those issues in that proceeding. Because the Western Farmers Agreement was filed within 30 days of the commencement of service, we grant SPP’s request for waiver of the Commission’s order).
Appears in 1 contract
Substantive Matters. We accept the Western Farmers Agreement, as discussed below. We find that the proposed revisions to the Western Farmers Agreement conform to SPP’s pro forma NITSA and that the non-conforming terms and conditions were previously accepted by the Commission were and are not directly challenged by Western Farmers.14 Farmers.22 We also find that the issues raised in Western Farmers’ comments are the subject of the pending Complaint proceeding in Docket No. EL19-93-000, and the Commission will consider those issues in that proceeding.
Appears in 1 contract