Summary Assessment. Within thirty (30) Days of Agency’s request, highlight significant accomplishments and problems. Identify recommendations and/or plans to improve services.
Summary Assessment. Contractor shall provide a summary assessment of the 14 overall materials handling systems from Contractor's perspective relative to financial 15 and physical status of the Shoreway Center. Contractor shall assess how well the 16 program is operating in terms of efficiency, economy and effectiveness relative to 17 meeting all the goals and objectives of this Agreement. Contractor shall provide 18 recommendations and plans to improve operations, which highlight significant 19 accomplishments and problems. Contractor shall document changes on a monthly 20 basis and include monthly documentation in the quarterly reporting.
Summary Assessment. Provide a summary assessment of the programs performed under this Agreement from Contractor's perspective relative to the financial and physical status of the program. The physical status assessment shall reflect how well the program is operating in terms of efficiency, economy, and effectiveness in meeting all the goals and objectives of this Agreement, particularly the Contractor’s Diversion goals. Provide recommendations and plans to improve, and highlight significant accomplishments and problems. Results shall be compared to other similar size communities served by the Contactor in the State.
Summary Assessment. Highlight significant accomplishments and problems. Identify recommendations and/or plans to improve services.
Summary Assessment. This section discusses strengths and weaknesses so as to allow an evaluation of data and interpretations and assess the knowledge acquired. A major issue it tries to deal with is an understanding of what we can ultimately do with the results of the relevant projects.
Summary Assessment. Within thirty (30) Days of Agency’s request, highlight 3586 significant accomplishments and problems. Identify recommendations and/or plans 3587 to improve services. 3588 C. Hazardous Waste Records. A summary or copy of the Hazardous Waste records 3589 required under Section 8.07.D. 3590 D. GPS Route Reports. Contractor shall provide GPS reports as reasonably requested 3591 by Agency or SBWMA. 3592 E. Other. The Agency reserves the right to request additional reports from the 3593 Contractor, and the Contractor shall deliver such reports within twenty-five (25) 3594 Business Days of such request provided that such information is similar in nature to 3595 the required elements of the monthly, quarterly, or annual reporting requirements 3596 described in Sections 9.05, 9.06, and 9.07. If the information requested by the 3597 Agency is not typically part of the Contractor’s reporting requirements described in 3598 Sections 9.05, 9.06, and 9.07, Contractor shall provide such information if the 3599 Contractor is required to maintain the information under the record-keeping 3600 requirements described in Sections 9.01, 9.02, and 9.03. 3601 Contractor acknowledges that the Agency has to submit information to State and local 3602 agencies related to the Act, AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383 and may require 3603 additional reporting from the Contractor. If Agency needs additional information to 3604 complete its reports, Contractor shall provide additional information to the extent 3605 Contractor has maintained records on the information requested. The Parties 3606 acknowledge that Contractor shall provide reports to the Agency, and shall not submit 3607 reports to State or local agencies on the behalf of the Agency. 3608
Summary Assessment. 1904 8.04.11.1 Summary assessment of the overall Solid Waste, 1905 Recyclable Materials, and Organic Materials program from CONTRACTOR'S perspective 1906 relative to financial and physical status of program. Description of the physical status is to relate 1907 to how well the program is operating for efficiency, economy, and effectiveness relative to 1908 meeting all the goals and objectives of this Agreement including particularly the 1909 CONTRACTOR’S diversion goals. 1910 8.04.11.2 Recommendations and plans to improve. 1911 8.04.11.3 Highlights of significant accomplishments and problems.
Summary Assessment. Strengths: site inventory and map visualisation; consideration of the environment’s role in the choice of site location. Weaknesses: problems with site definition as some are of low confidence (1 vase and the name of a nearby village), not full scale study of relationships between man-environment. Evaluation of data and Interpretation: not all data-sites have the same strength; however, the environmental – interpretative approach followed is very interesting, even if we need to take into account socio-ideological relationships between sites as well. Knowledge acquired: suggestions on site interrelationships and development, spatial and man- environment relationships. Integrability: medium-high Publication: completed Landscape approach: Visualisation of a variety of past human activity (settlements, burial sites, routes etc) within its main geographical and topographical settings. Environment is seen as playing the leading role in the formation and character of past settlements and cultural activity.
Summary Assessment. Strengths: documentation of research undertaken in the area with a very good scale map. Weaknesses: occasionally not clear definitions (e.g. ancient), and no consistency in site definition. This varies from a certain settlement with architecture and pottery spread to the locus of removable items and a wider area with several loci of antiquities. Often data say nothing more than the presence of material culture, which is expected in a heavily occupied and much researched area. The sought-after and result of most archaeological work has been the location of antiquities covering a definable space and their chronological and functional character. In the case of Knossos, this is a task of great importance, given the situation of continuous landscape change and the plethora of findings. However, sites in the context of this work are basically loci of archaeological material, and can be principally used as information rather than as data for regional analysis and inter-regional comparisons. The need for visualisation in order to manage a plethora of archaeological findings is expressed via the labour-intensive construction of a map at a scale of 1:5000, which still remains the best archaeological map available for the area. Every site in the catalogue includes the history of research and the interpretations of previous researchers even if evidence has disappeared, sometimes with comments that support or create doubts over specific interpretations. Hood tries to provide an as clear and objective picture of the archaeology as possible, paying attention rather to detailed historical recording, than the construction of a regional history, although his synthesis of data attempts to provide a general picture of the settlement history with size differences and loci of distinctive functional character over time. Environmental work undertaken falls within a general trend of the time that serious archaeological research should encompass a study of the environment. The acknowledgement of the relationship between man and environment and the influential role of the latter was stressed by New Archaeology and even though the views of the new theoretical framework were certainly not adopted by everyone, they indisputably left strong influential traces in the work of even typically traditional archaeologists such as Sinclair Hood. As in much survey work even in our days, environmental studies in this project aimed at providing a background or environmental framework within which ...
Summary Assessment. Strengths: a multi-disciplinary framework and a variety of methodological tools in landscape analysis. Weaknesses: site-oriented survey, with no sampling and off-site collections. Evaluation of data and Interpretation: survey data is incomplete and fragmentary. Interpretation is also preliminary, and is based on almost self-evident relationships between evidence and explanation. No exploration of complex social issues and whys. Knowledge acquired: a picture of site types on the landscape and the intensity of human activity in the landscape. Better understanding of the site of Itanos. Integrability: medium Publication: not completed. Landscape Approach: the landscape is approached as the spatial context of locations of material culture. Weight is given on the geometry of monuments and the landscape, and by mapping their location, the principal aim lies in establishing the spatial extents of human activity over time.
