TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Clause Samples
The Table of Authorities clause serves to list all legal sources, such as cases, statutes, and regulations, that are cited within a legal document. It typically organizes these authorities in alphabetical or categorical order, often including page numbers where each authority is referenced. This clause helps readers, judges, and opposing counsel quickly locate and verify the legal precedents and statutes relied upon, thereby enhancing the document’s credibility and facilitating efficient legal review.
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. CASES PARAGRAPH NO.
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES vi STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF ORAL ARGUMENT....................................................x STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW.................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE....................................................................2
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ACQUISITION CORP. v. UNIVERSAL FOODS CORP., 877 F.2d 496, 503 (7th Cir. 1989)..............................................................8 CTS CORP. v. DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA, 481 U.S. 69 (1987) .................8, 9 IN RE CERTIFIED QUESTION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ SPECIAL PROJECTS PROCUREMENT, MARKETING AND CONSULTING CORPORATION V. CONTINENTAL BIOMASS INDUSTRIES, INC., 468 Mich. 109; 659 N.W.2d 597 (2003).............................................4 Statutes Mich. Comp. Laws ss. ss.450.1790(2) ...........................................7 Mich. Comp. Laws ss. ss.450.1790-.1799......................................1, 2 Mich. Comp. Laws ss.450.1790(2), .1791(1)......................................2 Mich. Comp. Laws ss.450.1791(1) ...............................................3
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. Paragraph No.
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. Judgments Paragraphs Cited
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. Uber Technologies Inc v ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2020 SCC 16 3, 4, 26, 55, 57 Petrowest Corporation v Peace River Hydro Partners, 2019 BCSC 2221 6, 8, 10-14, 61, 63, Petrowest Corporation v Peace River Hydro Partners, 2020 BCCA 339 15, 22, 24-26, 34, 56 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ v TELUS Communications Inc, 2011 SCC 15 43 Kaverit Steel and Crane Ltd v Kone Corporation, 1992 ABCA 7 46 Aero Trades (West) Ltd (Receiver of) v Can, [1989] 1 WWR 723 (FCA) 50 Tanning Research Laboratories Inc v O'Brien, [1990] HCA 8 51 Business Development Bank of Canada v Astoria Organic Matters Ltd, 2019 ONCA 269 63 Third Eye Capital Corporation v Ressources Dianor Inc / Dianor Resources Inc, 2019 ONCA 508 63 Re Residential Warranty Co of Canada Inc, 2006 ABQB 236 63 New Skeena Forest Products Inc, 2005 BCCA 154 65 Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc v Wedgemount Power Limited Partnership, 2018 BCSC 970 66 Luscar Ltd v Smoky River Coal Limited, 1999 ABCA 179 66 ▇▇▇▇▇ Forest Services Limited (Re), 2009 BCSC 1169 66 ▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ltd (Re), 2009 BCSC 1552 66 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2002 SCC 33 68 Larc Developments Ltd v Levelton Engineering Ltd, 2010 BCCA 18 69 Dufferin Paving Co Ltd v ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Co of Canada, 1934 CanLII 123 (ONCA) 69 Fofonoff v C and C Taxi Service Limited, 1977 CanLII 358 (BCSC) 69 ▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, 2005 SCC 76 70 TAB 1 ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ on Receiverships, 3rd ed (2011) 26, 32-36, 49, 61, 65 TAB 2 ▇. ▇▇▇▇, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law, 2nd ed (2015) 33, 34, 36, 49, 61, 65 TAB 3 ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, "A Comparative Law Approach: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in American Insolvency Proceedings" (2018) 92 American Bankruptcy LJ 141 39 TAB 4 V. Priskich, "Binding non-signatories to arbitration agreements–who are persons 'claiming through or under' a party?" (2019) 35:3 Arbitration International 375 43 TAB 5 ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ on the Construction of Statutes, 6th ed (2014) 47 TAB 6 G. Born, International Commercial Arbitration, International Arbitration Agreements (2nd ed. 2014) vol. I, 56, 60 TAB 7 ▇. ▇. van den ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇., Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1999 (1999), vol. XXIVa 56 TAB 8 G. Born, International Commercial Arbitration, International Arbitration Agreements (3rd ed. 2021) vol. I, 60 TAB 9 ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Commercial Arbitration in Canada: A Guide to Domestic and International Arbitrations, looseleaf (Release 17, November 2020) 64, 66
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. AUTHORITIES PARAGRAPHS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. TO ▇▇▇▇:
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. Page(s) 4 American Ins. Ass’n ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 539 U.S. 396 (2003) 26 5 6 477 U.S. 242 (1986) 12 7 BG Grp., PLC v. Republic of Argentina 572 U.S. 25 (2014) 15, 16 8 9 847 F.2d 502 (9th Cir. 1988) 17 10 Clipper Express v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc. 11 690 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir. 1982) 12 12 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ v. Nat’l Foreign Trade Council 530 U.S. 363 (2000) 26 13 14 453 U.S. 654 (1981 26 15 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Texas 16 564 U.S. 940 (2015) 16
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES. CASES PARAGRAPH(S) [1994] 2 FC 406 25