Table S5 Sample Clauses

Table S5. Age-adjusted Incidence Rates and Incidence Rate Ratios of Serous Carcinoma by Race/Ethnicity for 2004–2009 (Period 1) and 2010–2015 (Period 2) N IR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) P value Overall 2004-2009 3,330 0.68 (0.65, 0.70) 1.00 2010-2015 NHW 5,532 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) 1.40 (1.34, 1.46) <0.0001 2004-2009 2,125 0.61 (0.58, 0.63) 1.00 2010-2015 NHB 3,233 0.81 (0.79, 0.84) 1.34 (1.27, 1.42) <0.0001 2004-2009 637 1.43 (1.32, 1.55) 1.00 2010-2015 NHO 1,199 2.13 (2.00, 2.26) 1.49 (1.35, 1.65) <0.0001 2004-2009 237 0.52 (0.46, 0.59) 1.00 2010-2015 Hispanic 493 0.83 (0.75, 0.90) 1.58 (1.35, 1.86) <0.0001 2004-2009 331 0.65 (0.58, 0.72) 1.00 2010-2015 607 0.87 (0.80, 0.95) 1.35 (1.17, 1.55) <0.0001 Rates are per 100,000 and age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Standard Population. Abbreviations: IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; NHW, non-Hispanic White; NHB, non-Hispanic Black; NHO, non-Hispanic Other. N IR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) P value Overall 2004-2009 871 0.18 (0.17, 0.19) 1.00 2010-2015 NHW 1,039 0.18 (0.17, 0.20) 1.03 (0.94, 1.13) 0.5850 2004-2009 563 0.16 (0.15, 0.17) 1.00 2010-2015 NHB 649 0.17 (0.15, 0.18) 1.05 (0.93, 1.18) 0.4629 2004-2009 145 0.34 (0.29, 0.40) 1.00 2010-2015 NHO 164 0.31 (0.26, 0.37) 0.91 (0.72, 1.16) 0.4739 2004-2009 75 0.17 (0.13, 0.21) 1.00 2010-2015 Hispanic 96 0.16 (0.13, 0.20) 0.95 (0.69, 1.31) 0.8106 2004-2009 88 0.17 (0.14, 0.21) 1.00 2010-2015 130 0.19 (0.16, 0.23) 1.10(0.83, 1.47) 0.5364 Rates are per 100,000 and age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Standard Population. Abbreviations: IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; NHW, non-Hispanic White; NHB, non-Hispanic Black; NHO, non-Hispanic Other. N IR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) P value Overall 2004-2009 3,308 0.67 (0.65, 0.70) 1.00 2010-2015 NHW 4,170 0.72 (0.70, 0.74) 1.07 (1.02, 1.12) 0.0077 2004-2009 2,098 0.60(0.57, 0.62) 1.00 2010-2015 NHB 2,421 0.61 (0.59, 0.64) 1.03 (0.97, 1.09) 0.3634 2004-2009 721 1.66 (1.53, 1.78) 1.00 2010-2015 NHO 951 1.71 (1.60, 1.83) 1.03 (0.93, 1.14) 0.5484 2004-2009 207 0.46 (0.40, 0.53) 1.00 2010-2015 Hispanic 326 0.56 (0.50, 0.62) 1.22 (1.02, 1.46) 0.0302 2004-2009 282 0.54 (0.48, 0.61) 1.00 2010-2015 472 0.64 (0.58, 0.71) 1.19(1.02, 1.40) 0.0276 Rates are per 100,000 and age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Standard Population. Abbreviations: IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; NHW, non-Hispanic White; NHB, non-Hispanic Black; NHO, non-Hispanic Other. Table S8. Treatment...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Table S5. Regression results for resting state connectome similarity when all covariates are included except for child age (for multicollinearity reasons, N = 76 dyads). Unstandardized B (SE) Standardized β p F df p R2 3.32 7, 68 .004 .26 Maltreatment -.087 (.036) -.243 .016 Parent Age -.001 (.001) -.124 .332 Age Difference -.006 (.002) -.363 .008 Child Sex .000 (.017) -.001 .995 Parent Sex -.011 (.019) -.070 .540 Different Sex .003 (.017) .020 .848 SES .019 (.013) .184 .146 Note. All results presented are based on bootstrapping with 1000 samples except for the standardized beta coefficient.
Sample 1
Table S5. Relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence interval (CI) for ED visits due to acute renal failure (ARF) associated with one day passed in the duration of heat wave. Heat waves are defined as periods of ≥ 2 consecutive days with temperature (T) or apparent temperature (AT) exceeding the 98th percentile using daily maximum (MAX), minimum (MIN), or average (AVG). The first day of the heat wave period is excluded ARF Day Sample size Lag0 R.R. (95%C.I.) Lag1 R.R. (95%C.I.) Lag2 R.R. (95%C.I.) Lag3 R.R. (95%C.I.) MAXT 2 29 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) 1.06 (0.92, 1.21) 1.07 (0.94, 1.22) 1.14 (1.00, 1.30) MAXT 3 18 1.05 (0.86, 1.29) 1.09 (0.89, 1.33) 1.22 (1.01, 1.48) 1.03 (0.84, 1.26) MAXT 4 10 1.00 (0.80, 1.26) 1.18 (0.95, 1.47) 1.13 (0.90, 1.41) 0.85 (0.66, 1.09) MAXT >4 34 1.14 (0.96, 1.34) 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) 1.06 (0.89, 1.27) 0.96 (0.80, 1.14) MINT 2 64 1.05 (0.97, 1.15) 1.07 (0.98, 1.16) 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) 1.08 (1.00, 1.18) MINT 3 44 1.06 (0.95, 1.18) 1.02 (0.92, 1.14) 1.09 (0.98, 1.21) 1.06 (0.95, 1.18) MINT 4 29 1.08 (0.95, 1.23) 1.15 (1.02, 1.30) 1.06 (0.94, 1.20) 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) MINT >4 95 1.08 (0.99, 1.19) 1.06 (0.97, 1.16) 1.00 (0.92, 1.10) 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) AVGT 2 35 1.03 (0.92, 1.15) 1.08 (0.97, 1.20) 1.01 (0.90, 1.13) 1.05 (0.94, 1.18) AVGT 3 22 1.10 (0.95, 1.28) 1.02 (0.88, 1.19) 0.98 (0.84, 1.15) 1.04 (0.89, 1.21) AVGT 4 14 1.04 (0.85, 1.28) 1.08 (0.89, 1.32) 1.06 (0.87, 1.30) 1.03 (0.83, 1.27) AVGT >4 52 1.13 (0.98, 1.03) 1.08 (0.94, 1.25) 1.05 (0.90, 1.21) 0.92 (0.79, 1.06) MAXAT 2 37 1.05 (0.94, 1.18) 1.03 (0.91, 1.16) 1.16 (1.03, 1.30) 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) MAXAT 3 24 1.06 (0.90, 1.24) 1.29 (1.12, 1.49) 1.08 (0.93, 1.26) 0.87 (0.74, 1.03) MAXAT 4 15 1.28 (1.08, 1.51) 1.14 (0.96, 1.34) 0.91 (0.75, 1.10) 1.07 (0.89, 1.27) MAXAT >4 33 1.11 (0.93, 1.31) 1.01 (0.85, 1.22) 0.99 (0.83, 1.18) 0.82 (0.68, 0.98) MINAT 2 35 1.03 (0.91, 1.16) 1.16 (1.03, 1.3) 1.04 (0.93, 1.18) 1.09 (0.97, 1.23) MINAT 3 21 1.14 (0.99, 1.32) 1.17 (1.02, 1.35) 1.06 (0.92, 1.24) 0.95 (0.80, 1.11) MINAT 4 13 1.24 (1.05, 1.48) 1.2 (1.00, 1.43) 0.96 (0.79, 1.17) 1.19 (0.99, 1.43) MINAT >4 27 1.10 (0.94, 1.27) 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) 1.13 (0.98, 1.30) 1.01 (0.87, 1.17) AVGAT 2 36 1.00 (0.89, 1.13) 1.16 (1.04, 1.30) 1.13 (1.01, 1.26) 1.01 (0.90, 1.13) AVGAT 3 22 1.08 (0.94, 1.23) 1.26 (1.12, 1.43) 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) 0.97 (0.83, 1.12) AVGAT 4 15 1.25 (1.09, 1.45) 1.12 (0.96, 1.30) 1.03 (0.87, 1.21) 0.99 (0.84, 1.17) AVGAT >4 45 1.13 (0.99, 1.29) 1.08 (0.93, 1.24) 1.01 (0.88, 1.16) 0.89 (0.77, 1.02...
Sample 1
Table S5. Selection of the reference model for the sooty albatross. Capture (p), transitions (ø) and survival (F) may be constant (.), time (t) or state (s) dependent and np is the number of parameters of the model. The best model is in italics. Table S6. Model selection for capture (p) and adult survival (F) of the sooty albatross. Dev is the deviance of the model and np its number of parameters. Appendix S1. Multistate model structure used for analysis of adult survival in biennial breeders. Appendix S2. Summary of the variables used for the breeding success and the survival analyses of the wandering and the sooty albatrosses. SSTA are sea surface temperatures anomalies, SOI is the Southern Oscillation Index. For the wandering albatross, subtropical and sub-Antarctic zones are distinguished with indices T and A respectively. Appendix S3. Principal Component Analyses on climate and fishery covariates. Appendix S4. Wandering albatross, demographic parameters and environmental effects. Appendix S5. Sooty albatross, demographic parameters and environmental effects Please note: Xxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Sample 1
Table S5. The different calculation models of integrated anammox or denitrification activity in the Beili agricultural upland soil. Table S6. Primers used in this study and correspondence reaction profiles. Table S7. The concentrations of added isotopic stock solutions.
Sample 1

Related to Table S5

  • Table 3 Appendix Information

  • Table 2 Determinations Determination Concerning Determiner Bereavement Leave Coordinator Parental Leave (all) Coordinator Sick Leave Coordinator

  • Table 4 Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum Changes Which Parties may end this Addendum as set out in Section 19: Importer Exporter Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum changes Part 2: Mandatory Clauses Entering into this Addendum

  • Table 2 (definition of “Casino Gross Revenue”) 15(e) 2 (definition of “Commissioning”) 19 2 (definition of “Committee’s Nominated Representative) 20(1) 6(1)(c) 20(2) 7(8)(a) 21(d) 11(1) 21(e) 11(2) 22(2) 11(3) 23(b) 14(d) 33(2) 15(a)(B) 35(1) 15(b)(i) 35(2) 15(c) 36(b) 15(d) 36(c)

  • Table 1b Allocation of Commonwealth supported places for designated courses of study for 20151 Cluster No. Funding cluster Number of designated undergraduate places (excluding medical places) for 2015 grant year (EFTSL)2 Number of undergraduate medical places for 2015 grant year (EFTSL) Number of non-research postgraduate places (excluding medical places) for 2015 grant year (EFTSL)3 Number of postgraduate medical places for 2015 grant year (EFTSL) Total number of Commonwealth supported places for 2015 grant year (EFTSL) 1 Law, accounting, administration, economics, commerce 478 0 20 0 498 6 Nursing 0 0 50 0 50 7 Engineering, science, surveying 202 0 0 0 202 NOTES:

  • Table 1 4 If ‘Yes’ to any then you are likely required to carry out a DPIA under Article 35 GDPR. If ‘No’, to all then a DPIA may not be required. 1 xxxxx://xxx-xxx.xxxxxx.xx/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02016R0679-20160504

  • Headings and Table of Contents The inclusion of headings and a table of contents in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the construction or interpretation hereof.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • TABLE OF CONTENT 0 Abstract 6 1 Introduction 7

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!