The reducible case Sample Clauses

The reducible case. We are ready to provide a generalised version of one of the main results in [GLS14]. Theorem 2.17 (Generalised Theorem 9.1). Suppose p > 2. Let ρ˜ : GK → GL2(Zp) be a continuous representation such that its reduction ρ : GK → GL2(Fp) is reducible. Suppose that ρ˜ is crystalline with κ-Xxxxx–Xxxx weights {bκ,1, bκ,2} for each κ ∈ HomQp (K, Qp), and suppose further that 0 ≤ bκ,1 — bκ,2 ≤ p for each κ. Then there is a reducible crystalline representation ρ˜′ : GK → GL2(Zp) with the same κ-Xxxxx–Xxxx weights as ρ˜ for each κ such that ρ ~= ρ′, where ρ′ is the reduction of ρ˜′. The proof is almost identical to the proof of [GLS14, Theorem 9.1] using our generalised results and our adjusted notions of types of Kisin modules in Definition 2.9 and the set Jmax from Definition 2.12. We give it in full as we will refer back to it later. 0 ψ2 κ,1 κ,2 2 IK
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The reducible case

  • In the Event of Forecasted Surpluses If the HSP is forecasting a surplus, the LHIN may adjust the amount of Funding to be paid under Schedule B, require the repayment of excess Funding and/or adjust the amount of any future funding installments accordingly.

  • CALCULATION OF FORECLOSURE LOSS Foreclosure after a Covered Loan Mod 1 Shared-Loss Month May-09 2 Loan no: 138554 3 REO # 843 4 Loan mod date 1/17/08 5 Interest paid-to-date 4/30/08 6 Foreclosure date 1/15/09 7 Liquidation date 4/12/09 8 Note Interest rate 4.000% 9 Most recent BPO 210,000 10 Most recent BPO date 1/20/09 Foreclosure Loss calculation 11 NPV of projected cash flows at loan mod 285,000 12 Less: Principal payments between loan mod and deliquency 2,500 13 Plus:

  • CONSEQUENCES OF POSITIVE TEST RESULTS For post-Accident or reasonable suspicion, a Covered Employee shall be immediately removed from performing his or her job or, in the alternative, may be temporarily reassigned to work that is not safety-sensitive if such work is available. The Covered Employee shall be subject to disciplinary action, and shall meet with the SAPC, as set forth in Exhibit A, and section 10 below, if the Covered Employee:

  • Offense Level Calculations i. The base offense level is 7, pursuant to Guideline § 2B1.1(a)(1).

  • Non-Paid Status During Treatment After Positive Test The employee will be in a non-pay status during any absence for evaluation or treatment, while participating in a rehabilitation program.

  • ODUF Pack Rejection 6.4.1 Image Access will notify BellSouth within one (1) business day of rejected packs (via the mutually agreed medium). Packs could be rejected because of pack sequencing discrepancies or a critical edit failure on the Pack Header or Pack Trailer records (e.g., out-of-balance condition on grand totals, invalid data populated). Standard ATIS EMI error codes will be used. Image Access will not be required to return the actual rejected data to BellSouth. Rejected packs will be corrected and retransmitted to Image Access by BellSouth.

  • Notice to Class Members 8.4.1 No later than three (3) business days after receipt of the Class Data, the Administrator shall notify Class Counsel that the list has been received and state the number of Class Members, PAGA Members, Workweeks, and Pay Periods in the Class Data.

  • FLORIDA CONVICTED/SUSPENDED/DISCRIMINATORY COMPLAINTS By submission of an offer, the respondent affirms that it is not currently listed in the Florida Department of Management Services Convicted/Suspended/Discriminatory Complaint Vendor List.

  • Notice to Settlement Class Members 5.1 The Parties agree that the following Notice Program provides reasonable notice to the Settlement Class.

  • Class Notice The Settling Parties have presented to the Court proposed forms of Settlement Notice, which are appended hereto as Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4, respectively.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.