The Researcher Clause Samples

The 'The Researcher' clause defines the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the individual or entity conducting research under the agreement. It typically outlines the Researcher's duties, such as adhering to ethical standards, maintaining confidentiality, and reporting progress or results to the other party. This clause ensures that both parties have a clear understanding of the Researcher's role, helping to prevent misunderstandings and establish accountability throughout the research project.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 3 times
The Researcher. The Researcher is a “▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇ Fellow”. They are appointed as a member of staff at NTNU (see Contract of Employment). The Terms and Conditions of the employment are the same as those of other members of staff at NTNU appointed at a similar level. The duration of the period of the MSCA Fellowship will be: The Researcher must conduct the MSCA research project according to the ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Agreement for: The location of the MSCA Fellowship will be NTNU, Campus XXX, Department XXX. The Researcher will be supervised during their stay at NTNU by (Fill in - Title, Name), hereinafter referred to as the "Supervisor(s)".
The Researcher. The Research Services will be performed by ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, D.V.S., a doctoral student working under the supervision and responsibility of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed from time to time by Yissum (the “Researcher”).
The Researcher. The Services will be performed by or under the sole control and supervision of D▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed by Yissum, provided that the Company has authorized in advance and in writing the appointment of such qualified person (the “Researcher”).
The Researcher. 3.1 The Research will be performed by, or under the control and supervision of, P▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (the “Researcher”). In the event that the Researcher, for any reason whatsoever, shall be unable to conduct the Research, or shall cease to be available for the performance of the undertakings set forth in this Agreement, Yissum shall use its best efforts to appoint, within 30 (thirty) days, a successor researcher whose identity shall be approved in advance by the Company (the “Successor Researcher”). Upon the Successor Researcher’s appointment, the Successor Researcher shall be deemed to be a Researcher for all purposes herein. Should the Parties not be able to agree on the identity of a Successor Researcher, notwithstanding their best efforts to do so, the Company shall have the right to terminate the Research and will bear no liability for such termination, provided that (i) no monies paid to Yissum for the Research pursuant to Section 5.1, below, will be refunded by Yissum to the Company, and (ii) the Company shall be responsible for the payment of any accrued fees and expenses due to Yissum based on work duly performed up to the date of termination and those irrevocable commitments entered into by Yissum prior to having received the Company’s written notice of termination. 3.2 In the performance of the Research, Yissum and the Researcher shall cooperate with, and as necessary, reach decisions with the agreement of the Company’s CEO and/or any official appointed by the Company for such purpose. 3.3 The Researcher shall perform the Research to the best of his abilities, in a diligent, trustworthy, professional and efficient manner, and with the due care and diligence as required by the best practice in the field of academic research. The Researcher shall comply with: (i) with all applicable laws and regulations, as may be amended from time to time; and (ii) with all applicable standards, regulations or guidelines for good academic research practice.
The Researcher. The Services will be performed by or under the control and supervision of Prof. Avi Domb or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed from time to time by Yissum (the “Researcher”).
The Researcher. The researcher is more often than not driven by a desire to see their work being used in some way or other. Whether that is seeing something on the shelves in the local shops or seeing a product being used beneficially by someone, the result is the same and brings a sense of satisfaction. The researcher also wants to be able to do more research. This may sound obvious, but researchers don’t like to be prevented from doing their work by IPR limitations, and they see themselves as free thinkers who come up with great ideas. Of course, money is still a motivation, and a researcher will often believe that their ideas have a high commercial value. This isn’t always true, and it may be that a great idea doesn’t offer a commercial organisation the opportunity to make the all-important profit, but this is not always obvious to the researcher owning the IP. In order to achieve these objectives, the researcher has a number of routes to market that they can take, each with advantages and disadvantages which must be carefully weighed up. On the assumption that the researcher has created a piece of identifiable intellectual property (IP) in the form perhaps of software, algorithm, design or simply unique knowledge, the first decision is whether to make the IP publically accessible or to retain ownership and aim to gain financial benefit from its exploitation. Software can be made available open source, or knowledge can be published in a publically accessible forum. This has the advantage that there is no obligation on the researcher to maintain or develop the research any further – anyone making use of their ideas might be expected to acknowledge its provenance, but would be free to make their own implementation and would take on the costs of development and support. The disadvantage to the researcher would be a loss of control over their ideas, and loss of any financial benefit that might accrue. A half- way house that is available is to release designs or software as “dual license”. This means that, for certain specified applications such as non-profit research, the IP can be used with an acknowledgement and without compromising original ownership. Any commercial exploitation of the IP would be licensed from the researcher. For their part, the researcher must ensure that the IP does not incorporate any “viral” open source elements (which corrupt the IP they are built into) or any commercial components, which may be used under an academic license during the research p...

Related to The Researcher

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Research Primary Investigator as part of a multi-site study (25 points) • Co-Investigator as part of a multi-site study (20 points) • Primary Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (15 points) • Co-Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (10 points) • Develops a unit specific research proposal (5 points) • Conducts a literature review as part of a research study (5 points)

  • Research Matters By entering into this Agreement, the Placement Agent does not provide any promise, either explicitly or implicitly, of favorable or continued research coverage of the Company and the Company hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Placement Agent’s selection as a placement agent for the Offering was in no way conditioned, explicitly or implicitly, on the Placement Agent providing favorable or any research coverage of the Company. In accordance with FINRA Rule 2711(e), the parties acknowledge and agree that the Placement Agent has not directly or indirectly offered favorable research, a specific rating or a specific price target, or threatened to change research, a rating or a price target, to the Company or inducement for the receipt of business or compensation.

  • Collaboration 31.1 If the Buyer has specified in the Order Form that it requires the Supplier to enter into a Collaboration Agreement, the Supplier must give the Buyer an executed Collaboration Agreement before the Start date. 31.2 In addition to any obligations under the Collaboration Agreement, the Supplier must: 31.2.1 work proactively and in good faith with each of the Buyer’s contractors 31.2.2 co-operate and share information with the Buyer’s contractors to enable the efficient operation of the Buyer’s ICT services and G-Cloud Services

  • University Any notice may be served upon the University by delivering it, in writing, to the University at the address set forth on the last page of this Agreement, by depositing it in a United States Postal Service deposit box with the postage fully prepaid and with the notice addressed to the University at the aforementioned address, or by sending a facsimile of it to the University facsimile number set forth on the last page of this Agreement.