Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic that is exchanged between the End Users of OE- LEC and AT&T-22STATE, the Parties agree to establish a direct End Office trunk group when traffic levels exceed one DS1 (24 DS0s) to or from an AT&T-22STATE End Office.
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic for Connecticut. The Parties will also agree that any billing true-ups, reimbursements, or other accounting adjustments on past traffic shall be made uniformly and on the same date as for all traffic exchanged under Section 251(b)(5) of the Act. By way of interpretation and without limiting the application of the foregoing, the Parties intend for retroactive compensation adjustments to apply to all traffic among AT&T CONNECTICUT, CLEC and CMRS carriers in Connecticut where traffic is exchanged as local calls within the meaning of this Attachment.
6.2.5 In instances where the originating carrier is originating Telecommunications traffic over its own facilities (i.e., not leased or purchased from AT&T-22STATE) the following Tandem serving rate elements are applicable on a terminating MOU basis and include compensation for the following sub-elements if such network functions are actually provided by the terminating Party for the termination of the originating Party’s traffic:
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic exchanged between AT&T- 12STATE and CLEC, the Parties agree to impose no call termination charges pertaining to reciprocal compensation on each other.
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic exchanged between AT&T- 12STATE and CLEC where CLEC’s End User originates a call that is terminated to a AT&T- 12STATE End User, such traffic shall be paid for reciprocally at the FCC Plan rate set forth in Section 5.3.2 for the transport and termination of Section 251(b)(5) Traffic, and ISP-Bound Traffic.
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic exchanged between SBC CALIFORNIA, SBC NEVADA and SBC SOUTHWEST REGION 5-STATE end users and CLEC’s end users where CLEC utilizes Lawful ULS (including UST) of SBC CALIFORNIA, SBC NEVADA or SBC SOUTHWEST REGION 5-STATE, such traffic shall be paid for reciprocally at the End Office Switching compensation rate contained in the Reciprocal Compensation section of Appendix Pricing.
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic exchanged between SBC MIDWEST REGION 5-STATE end users and CLEC’s end users where CLEC utilizes SBC MIDWEST REGION 5-STATE’s Lawful ULS (including UST), such traffic shall be paid for reciprocally at the Lawful ULS Reciprocal Compensation rate contained in Appendix Pricing. For the states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois, the Lawful ULS Reciprocal Compensation rate is the same as the End Office Switching rate found in the Reciprocal Compensation section of Appendix Pricing.
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic in a particular state on and after a designated date pursuant to the terms and conditions of the FCC’s interim terminating compensation plan, the compensation set forth below in Sections 5.2 through 5.6 will apply only to Section 251(b)
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic that is exchanged between the End Users of OE-LEC and
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic that originates from a TDS End User and terminates to an AT&T ILLINOIS End User as ISP-Bound Traffic at the FCC’s interim ISP terminating compensation rates set forth in Section 2.2.2, Exhibit A of the Reciprocal Compensation Amendment (Adopting FCC Interim ISP Terminating Compensation Plan).
2.3.4 The percentages set forth in Section 2.3.3 shall remain in place from the Effective Date of this Amendment. Thereafter, either Party has the right to request the other Party to adjust the percentages, every six months, by identifying the actual ISP-Bound Traffic, based upon the methodology set forth in Section 2.3.2. In the event the percentages are adjusted, the adjusted percentages will be applied on a prospective basis only, effective with the first day of the calendar quarter following the establishment of the adjusted percentage.
2.3.5 The Parties agree that, for the Term of this Amendment or for a period of 18 months, whichever is shorter, the methodology set forth in Section 2.3.2 shall serve as the exclusive means for rebutting the presumption described in Section 2.3.2. Thereafter, either Party may request a different methodology to rebut the presumption. Upon a request to change the methodology used to rebut the presumption, the Parties may implement a methodology mutually agreeable to the Parties. If the Parties are unable to agree on an alternate methodology, either Party may petition the Commission to establish and implement an alternate methodology (or, if one Party so chooses, to maintain the methodology set forth in Section 2.3.
Traffic and ISP. Bound Traffic that originates from a TDS End User and terminates to an AT&T ILLINOIS End User as Section 251(b)(5) Traffic at the reciprocal compensation rates set forth in Section 4, Appendix Reciprocal Compensation in the underlying Agreement; and (b) nine percent (9%) of the combined Section 251(b)
