Uncertainties. Assess the uncertainty and risks of failing to achieve and maintain the good status objective under various climate change scenarios.
Uncertainties. In this subsection the statistical and systematic uncertainties are discussed using the |Hφ | example flight at a middle frequency of f = 55 MHz and a zenith angle bin of (Θ = 42.5±2.5)◦ as mentioned above. This zenith angle is chosen as most events at AERA are reconstructed coming from this direction. While some systematic uncertainties are stable between flights, e.g., measurement of the power injected to the transmitting antenna or the transmitting antenna response pattern, others are flight dependent, e.g., the octocopter position and the measurement of the receiving power at the AUT. The VEL relative uncertainties are listed in table 2. These individual uncertainties are described in detail in the following subsections. The constant systematic uncertainties add quadratically to 6.3% and the flight dependent systematic uncertainty is 6.9%.
Uncertainties. The next three years will present significant economic, political and financial uncertainty in the external environment facing the college and our partners. While these are outwith our control, it is critical that we continue to make a positive impact on the region. The wider political situation in Scotland, the UK and Europe over the next three years is already creating uncertainty. Although the impact, for example, of BREXIT and new arrangements for welfare reform and national bargaining are still largely unknown, such changes will present challenges for the college, our students, communities and employers. Therefore, to deliver this ambitious outcome agreement requires a significant increase in core funding. Financial challenges such as the introduction of a simplified funding model and changes to funding for extended learning support have the potential to put at risk support for students who need it most. For example, in 2015-16 a fifth of the college’s credit activity supported students with a declared disability and 20.5% supported students who lived in SIMD10 areas. Ayrshire College # 193132 2018-01-17 11:55:44 (UTC+00 Regionalisation is likely to remain high on the political agenda, in particular in relation to economic development and education. The outcomes of the consultation on governance arrangements in schools, as well as the review of enterprise and skills agencies, could have far-reaching consequences for schools, local authorities and national agencies. Changes arising from these reviews will require the college to be agile in how we work with national and local partners to ensure that people, communities and the economy in Ayrshire grow and develop through skills. Strategic Plan 2017-20 We will continue to be proactive to changes in the external environment and flexible in our approach to the delivery of learning and services to support our students. By working in collaboration with partners we will maximise the potential outcomes for our students. Our strategic goals for 2017-20 reflect this approach, and support Scottish Funding Council outcomes. These goals are:
Uncertainties. There are uncertainties in the ability of the lead models to predict blood lead levels for the receptors at the LPRSA. In addition to the uncertainties noted in Appendix G of the HHRA, the HHRA exposure scenarios, while considered reasonable maximum exposures (RME), are at the lower limits of the lead model designs. Exposures were assumed to occur one to three times per week over a 13-week period (i.e., 91-day period). The Technical Review Workgroup for Metals and Asbestos (TRW) Lead Committee “recommends that users not apply the IEUBK model or the ALM to assess exposure frequency less than 1 day per week and of duration shorter than 90 consecutive days... The reliability of these models for predicting PbB concentrations for exposure durations less than 90 consecutive days has not been assessed” (USEPA 2016a). The models may overpredict blood lead concentrations for exposures that are less frequent and of shorter duration than the HHRA RME scenarios. In addition, there is uncertainty in the use of a default soil lead concentration of 200 mg/kg to estimate the time-weighted average. Average urban soil lead concentrations near the LPRSA have not been measured and may be higher or lower than 200 mg/kg. Off-site soil lead concentrations would be associated with sources other than the LPRSA. As noted in USEPA 2016b, Superfund programs do not normally set cleanup levels below natural or anthropogenic background levels. The single measurement of lead in accessible sediment above Dundee Dam, upstream of the LPRSA, was 189 mg/kg. This upstream concentration is just a bit lower than the default soil lead concentration of 200 mg/kg. However, the data is extremely limited and cannot be counted on to characterize background sediment or soil concentrations with any certainty. Although the December 2016 memo specifically addresses soil, in order to be protective, CDM Xxxxx reran the IEUBK and ALM modeling for select receptors from the LPRSA HHRA who may be exposed to other media (e.g., sediment, surface water). Using the blood lead level of concern of 5 µg/dL identified in the memo shows that the percentage of children below that target is generally in Refinements to Lead Models for the LPRSA Human Health Risk Assessment May 30, 2017 agreement with the conclusions in Appendix G of the HHRA. Therefore, lead is not considered to be a COC for the LPRSA. AECOM. 2017. Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment for the Lower Passaic River Study Area, Revised Draft Final. Prepared f...
Uncertainties. The current uncertainties of the IAM module include but are not limited to: • The ability for each module to work directly with Keycloak as an authentication and authorization service
Uncertainties. At the time of writing this document uncertainties include, but are not limited to: • Terraform and Ansible playbooks could be automatically or manually run by HEROES Support / Admin Team to create Private Cloud Clusters. The on-premise deployment on HPC Centre could be manually run by HPC Centre admins, supported by the HEROES Support / Admin Team, to install the required components on their premises and perform prerequisite checks. On the other side the HEROES Runtime will be pushed by the HEROES platform whenever needed. • Which CSP platforms will be involved (initial target are AWS [1] and OCI [2]) • Configuration and type of communication channels between the HPC Centres Headnodes and the HEROES platform (aside from the assumed SSH channel) • Configuration and type of communication channels between the HPC Centres Headnodes and the public internet (e.g., to recover software from public repositories)
Uncertainties. At the time of writing this deliverable, it is unclear what will be possible to offer in the EAR- light versions. It will depend on specific configurations for clouds and HPC centres. Anyway, we will automatically detect the limitations and we will offer application monitoring, system monitoring (if possible). and energy optimization (if possible). We assume application monitoring (for accounting) will be always possible with more or less details.
Uncertainties. At the time of writing this document uncertainties include, but are not limited to: • Type and size of storage endpoints • Usage of quotas for enforcing a limit in user data consumption • Duration of a data transfer (depending on size of data, the available bandwidth, and its distance between the transfer points)
Uncertainties. The current uncertainties include but are not limited to: • How will user receive the role of “Application packager”? Do we dissociate an application packager from a customer and from Application Provider? • Should published applications be restricted to use by organizations, groups of users, or can they be public for everyone? • Should published applications be restricted to use by organizations, groups of users, or can they be public for every organization within the HEROES platform?
Uncertainties. At the time of writing this document uncertainties include, but are not limited to: • Job status polling: What solution will be used as job registry to store the job status of cluster(s). • Any defined budget (see Cost Management, Section 4.9) limit could be reached while the execution of workflow: What will be stopped in workflows and how it will be managed. • Using remote visualisation to launch interactive sessions: the idea is to deploy a GPU node or use a visualization node on-premises resources to allow the use of graphical tools to review the results of the engineering workflows. • How to control the versioning of modules and workflows created by the Ryax tools.
