Common use of Work and Work Product of the Standard Drafting Team Clause in Contracts

Work and Work Product of the Standard Drafting Team. The SDT will then develop a work plan for completing the Standard development work, including the establishment of milestones for completing critical elements of the work in sufficient detail to ensure that the SDT will meet the date objective established by the SC or the SDT shall propose an alternative date. This plan is then delivered to the SC for its concurrence. The SDT is to meet, either in person or via electronic means as necessary, establish sub- work teams (made up of members of the SDT) as necessary, and performs other activities to address the parameters of the SAR and the milestone date(s) established by the SC. The work product of the SDT will consist of the following: • A draft Standard consistent with the SAR on which it was based. • An assessment of the impact of the SAR on neighboring regions, and appropriate input from the neighboring regions if the SAR is determined to impact any neighboring region. • An implementation plan, including the nature, extent and duration of field- testing, if any. • Identification of any existing Standard that will be deleted, in part or whole, or otherwise impacted by the implementation of the draft Standard. • Technical reports, white papers and/or work papers that provide technical support for the draft Standard under consideration. • Document the perceived reliability impact should the Standard be approved. Upon completion of these tasks, the SDT submits these documents to the SC, which will verify that the proposed Standard is consistent with the SAR on which it was developed The SDT regularly (at least once each month) informs the SC of its progress in meeting a timely completion of the draft Standard. The SDT may request of the SC scope changes of the SAR at any point in the Standard development process. The SC may, at any time, exercise its authority over the Standards development process by directing the SDT to move to Step 4 and post for comment the current work product. If there are competing drafts, the SC may, at its sole discretion, have posted the version(s) of the draft Standard for comment on the ReliabilityFirst website. The SC may take this step at any time after a SDT has been commissioned to develop the Standard.

Work and Work Product of the Standard Drafting Team. The RSM will collaborate with the SDT will then to develop a work plan for completing the Standard development work, including the establishment of milestones for completing critical elements of the work in sufficient detail to ensure that the SDT will meet the date objective established by the SC or the SDT shall propose an alternative dateelements. This plan is then shall be delivered and reported to the SC RSC, and based upon this work plan, the RSC shall declare a preliminary date on which a completed draft Regional Standard and associated supporting documentation will be available for its concurrencecomment. The SDT is to meet, either in person or via electronic means (such as Web Ex) as necessary, establish sub- sub-work teams or groups (made up of members of the SDT) as necessary, and performs other activities to address the parameters of the SAR and the milestone date(s) established by the SC. The work product of the SDT will consist of the following: • A draft Regional Standard consistent with the SAR on which it was based. • An assessment of the impact of the SAR on neighboring regions, and appropriate input from the neighboring regions if the SAR is determined to impact any neighboring region. • An implementation plan, including the nature, extent and duration of field- field-testing, if any. • Identification of any existing Regional Standard (or other regional criteria, protocol, or rule) that will may be deleted, in part or whole, or otherwise impacted by the implementation of the draft Regional Standard. • Technical reports, white papers reports and/or work papers that provide technical support for the draft Regional Standard under consideration. • Document the The perceived reliability impact should the Regional Standard be approved. • A draft of recommended Violation Risk Factors (VRFs) and Violation Severity Levels (VSLs), in coordination with Texas RE staff. Upon completion of these tasks, the SDT submits shall submit these documents to the SCRSC, which will verify that the proposed Regional Standard is consistent with the SAR on which it was developed developed. The SDT shall regularly (at least once each month) informs report to and inform the SC RSC of its progress in meeting a the timely completion of the draft Regional Standard. The SDT may request of the SC scope changes of the SAR RSC, at any point in the Regional Standard development processDevelopment Process, and change in the scope of the SAR. The SC RSC may, at any time, exercise its authority over the Regional Standards development process Development Process by directing the SDT to move to Step 4 (below) and post for comment the current work productproduct for comment. Any interested entity (including the Originator and the RSM) that contends that the SDT is not effectively progressing on a draft standard or variance may notify the RSC. If there are competing draftsany entity contends that the RSC has not taken timely action regarding any requested standard, the SC mayentity may file a written complaint with the RSM, at who will notify the RSC. If the RSC cannot resolve the complaint within sixty days, the complaining entity may request that its sole discretion, have posted the version(s) of the draft Standard for comment complaint be included on the ReliabilityFirst website. The SC may take this step at any time after a SDT has been commissioned RSM’s report to develop the StandardTexas RE BOD.

Work and Work Product of the Standard Drafting Team. The SDT will then develop a work plan for completing the Standard development work, including the establishment of milestones for completing critical elements of the work in sufficient detail to ensure that the SDT will meet the date objective deadline established by the SC or the SDT shall propose an alternative date. This plan is then delivered to the SC for its concurrence. The SDT is to meet, either in person or via electronic means as necessary, establish sub- work teams (made up of members of the SDT) as necessary, and performs other activities to address the parameters of the SAR and the milestone date(s) established by the SC. The work product of the SDT will consist of the following: • A draft Standard consistent with the SAR on which it was based. • An assessment of the impact of the SAR on neighboring regions, and appropriate input from the neighboring regions if the SAR is determined to impact any neighboring region. • An implementation plan, including the nature, extent and duration of field- testing, if any. • Identification of any existing Standard that will be deleted, in part or whole, or otherwise impacted by the implementation of the draft Standard. • Technical reports, white papers and/or work papers that provide technical support for the draft Standard under consideration. • Document the perceived reliability impact should the Standard be approved. Upon completion of these tasks, the SDT submits these documents to the SC, which will verify that the proposed Standard is consistent with the SAR on which it was developed The SDT regularly (at least once each month) informs the SC of its progress in meeting a timely completion of the draft Standard. The SDT may request of the SC scope changes of the SAR at any point in the Standard development process. The SC may, at any time, exercise its authority over the Standards development process by directing the SDT to move to Step 4 and post for comment the current work product. If there are competing drafts, the SC may, at its sole discretion, have posted post the version(s) of the draft Standard for comment on the ReliabilityFirst website. The SC may take this step at any time after a SDT has been commissioned to develop the Standard.

Work and Work Product of the Standard Drafting Team. The SDT Reliability Standards Manager will then develop a work plan for completing the Standard development work, including the establishment of milestones for completing critical elements of the work in sufficient detail to ensure that the SDT will meet the date objective established by the SC RSC or the SDT shall propose an alternative date. This plan is then delivered to the SC RSC for its concurrence. The SDT is to meet, either in person or via electronic means as necessary, establish sub- sub-work teams (made up of members of the SDT) as necessary, and performs other activities to address the parameters of the SAR and the milestone date(s) established by the SCRSC. The work product of the SDT will consist of the following: • A draft Standard consistent with the SAR on which it was based. • An assessment of the impact of the SAR on neighboring regions, and appropriate input from the neighboring regions if the SAR is determined to impact any neighboring region. • An implementation plan, including the nature, extent and duration of field- testing, if any. • Identification of any existing Standard that will be deleted, in part or whole, or otherwise impacted by the implementation of the draft Standard. Standard • Technical reports, white papers reports and/or work papers that provide technical support for the draft Standard under consideration. • Document the perceived reliability impact should the Standard be approved. Upon completion of these tasks, the SDT submits these documents to the SCRSC, which will verify that the proposed Standard is consistent with the SAR on which it was developed developed. The SDT regularly (at least once each month) informs the SC RSC of its progress in meeting a timely completion of the draft Standard. The SDT may request of the SC RSC scope changes of the SAR at any point in the Standard development processDevelopment Process. The SC RSC may, at any time, exercise its authority over the Standards development process Development Process by directing the SDT to move to Step 4 (below) and post for comment the current work product. If there are competing drafts, the SC RSC may, at its sole discretion, have posted the version(s) of the draft Standard for comment on the ReliabilityFirst websiteTexas RE Website. The SC RSC may take this step at any time after a SDT has been commissioned to develop the Standard.