Common use of XXXX Values Clause in Contracts

XXXX Values. Through a Class Year Study, a Developer may elect no XXXX, partial XXXX, or full XXXX for its Project by satisfying the applicable sections of this Attachment S. Through an Expedited Deliverability Study, a Developer may elect XXXX or partial XXXX to the extent its requested XXXX is deliverable pursuant to the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard. Each Project qualifying for XXXX will have two XXXX values per Project: one for the Summer Capability Period and one for the Winter Capability Period. For Projects comprised of multiple Generators, the Project’s XXXX, subject to the maximum permissible requested XXXX pursuant to Section 25.8.1 of this Attachment S, shall be allocated among the multiple Generators, and shall be allocated among the multiple Generators, as requested by Developer (to the extent permissible under Section 25.8.1 of this Attachment S). The Project’s XXXX and allocation of XXXX among its units, as applicable, will be specified by ISO in the Class Year Deliverability Study report approved by the ISO Operating Committee. The Project’s XXXX value for the Summer Capability Period will be set using the deliverability test methodology and procedures described below. Through the Winter Capability Period 2017/2018, the Project’s XXXX value for the Winter Capability Period will be set at a value that will maintain the same proportion of XXXX to ERIS as the Project has for the Summer Capability Period. For Winter Capability Periods beyond 2017/2018, the Project’s XXXX value for the Winter Capability Period will be determined by the applicable process below: 25.7.6.1 Xxxxxx XXXX will be calculated as follows: 25.7.6.1.1 For facilities with Summer XXXX as of December 16, 2017, the following additional provision applies: For such facilities for which there is an ISO-accepted temperature curve used for determining the Project’s DMNC, Xxxxxx XXXX will be calculated using such temperature curve, provided the capability represented by the curve does not exceed the Project’s ERIS. For facilities for which there is not an ISO-accepted temperature curve used for determining the Project’s DMNC, Xxxxxx XXXX will be set equal to the Project’s Summer XXXX unless the Project provides a temperature curve to the ISO by December 16, 2017, that the ISO subsequently determines is acceptable. 25.7.6.1.2 For facilities first obtaining Summer XXXX on or after December 16, 2017, the Xxxxxx XXXX will be determined using the most recent temperature curve provided to and accepted by the ISO, either during the interconnection process or at the time the Summer XXXX is first obtained. 25.7.6.2 Upon an increase to a Project’s Summer XXXX pursuant to a permissible increase in Summer XXXX under Section 25.9.4 of this Attachment S, Attachment X, Section 30.3.2.6 or Attachment Z, Section 32.4.11.1 (increases in XXXX not requiring a Class Year Study) or pursuant to an increase in Summer XXXX evaluated in a Class Year Study for which a Developer accepts its Project Cost Allocation for System Deliverability Upgrades and posts Security therefore (if applicable) or accepts its Deliverable MWs, the Xxxxxx XXXX will be determined using the formula set forth in Section 25.7.6 (i), wherein the Summer XXXX MW will be the increased Summer XXXX MW.

XXXX Values. Through a Class Year Study, a Developer may elect no XXXX, partial XXXX, or full XXXX for its Project by satisfying the applicable sections of this Attachment S. Through an Expedited Deliverability Study, a Developer may elect XXXX or partial XXXX to the extent its requested XXXX is deliverable pursuant to the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard. Each Project qualifying for XXXX will have two XXXX values per Project: one for the Summer Capability Period and one for the Winter Capability Period. For Projects comprised of multiple Generators, the Project’s XXXX, subject to the maximum permissible requested XXXX pursuant to Section 25.8.1 of this Attachment S, shall be allocated among the multiple Generators, and shall be allocated among the multiple Generators, as requested by Developer (to the extent permissible under Section 25.8.1 of this Attachment S). The Project’s XXXX and allocation of XXXX among its units, as applicable, will be specified by ISO in the Class Year Deliverability Study report approved by the ISO Operating Committee. The Project’s XXXX value for the Summer Capability Period will be set using the deliverability test methodology and procedures described below. Through the Winter Capability Period 2017/2018, the Project’s XXXX value for the Winter Capability Period will be set at a value that will maintain the same proportion of XXXX to ERIS as the Project has for the Summer Capability Period. For Winter Capability Periods beyond 2017/2018, the Project’s XXXX value for the Winter Capability Period will be determined by the applicable process below: 25.7.6.1 Xxxxxx XXXX will be calculated as follows: 25.7.6.1.1 For facilities with Summer XXXX as of December 16, 2017, the following additional provision applies: For such facilities for which there is an ISO-ISO- accepted temperature curve used for determining the Project’s DMNC, Xxxxxx XXXX will be calculated using such temperature curve, provided the capability represented by the curve does not exceed the Project’s ERIS. For facilities for which there is not an ISO-accepted temperature curve used for determining the Project’s DMNC, Xxxxxx XXXX will be set equal to the Project’s Summer XXXX unless the Project provides a temperature curve to the ISO by December 16, 2017, that the ISO subsequently determines is acceptable. 25.7.6.1.2 For facilities first obtaining Summer XXXX on or after December 16, 2017, the Xxxxxx XXXX will be determined using the most recent temperature curve provided to and accepted by the ISO, either during the interconnection process or at the time the Summer XXXX is first obtained. 25.7.6.2 Upon an increase to a Project’s Summer XXXX pursuant to a permissible increase in Summer XXXX under Section 25.9.4 of this Attachment S, Attachment X, Section 30.3.2.6 or Attachment Z, Section 32.4.11.1 (increases in XXXX not requiring a Class Year Study) or pursuant to an increase in Summer XXXX evaluated in a Class Year Study for which a Developer accepts its Project Cost Allocation for System Deliverability Upgrades and posts Security therefore (if applicable) or accepts its Deliverable MWs, the Xxxxxx XXXX will be determined using the formula set forth in Section 25.7.6 (i), wherein the Summer XXXX MW will be the increased Summer XXXX MW.