Common use of Xxxxxx of Proof Clause in Contracts

Xxxxxx of Proof. In an action under the Act, the franchisee has the burden of proving that the franchise was terminated or not renewed. The franchisor has the burden of proving, as an affirmative defense, that the termination or nonrenewal was permitted under the Act and, if applicable, that the franchisor complied with certain other requirements relating to terminations and nonrenewals based on condemnation or destruction of the marketing premises.

Xxxxxx of Proof. In an action under the Act, the franchisee has the burden of proving that the franchise was terminated or not renewed. The franchisor has the burden of proving, as an affirmative defense, that the termination or nonrenewal non-renewal was permitted under the Act Act, and, if applicable, that the franchisor complied with certain other requirements relating to terminations and nonrenewals non-renewals based on condemnation or destruction of the marketing premises.

Xxxxxx of Proof. ​ In an action under the Act, the franchisee has the burden of proving that the franchise was terminated or not renewed. The franchisor has the burden of proving, as an affirmative defense, that the termination or nonrenewal was permitted under the Act and, if applicable, that the franchisor complied with certain other requirements relating to terminations and nonrenewals based on condemnation or destruction of the marketing premises.. ​

Xxxxxx of Proof. In an action under the Act, the franchisee has the burden of proving that the franchise was terminated or not renewed. The franchisor has the burden of proving, as an affirmative defense, that the termination or nonrenewal non-renewal was permitted under the Act Act, and, if applicable, that the franchisor complied with certain other requirements relating to terminations and nonrenewals non-renewals based on condemnation or destruction of the marketing premises.