THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY DIRECTOR DEFERRED FEE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this first day of December, 1996 by and between The Ohio Valley Bank Company (the "Company"), and Jeffrey E. Smith (the "Director"). INTRODUCTION
EXHIBIT 10.20
THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY
THIS AGREEMENT is made this first day of December, 1996 by and between The Ohio Valley Bank Company (the "Company"), and Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx (the "Director").
To encourage the Director to remain a member of the Company's Board of Directors, the Company is
willing to provide to the Director a deferred fee opportunity. The
Company will pay the benefits from its general assets.
The Director and the Company agree as follows:
Article 1
1.1.1 "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. References to a Code section shall be deemed to be to that section as it now exists and to any successor
provision.
1.1.2 "Disability" means the Director's inability to perform substantially all normal duties of a director, as determined by the Company's Board of Directors in its sole discretion.
As a condition to any benefits, the Company may require the Director to submit to such physical or mental evaluations and tests as the Board of Directors deems appropriate.
1.1.3 "Distribution Date" means December 31, 2020.
1.1.4 "Election Form" means the Form attached as Exhibit 1.
1.1.5 "Fees" means the total directors fees payable to the Director.
1.1.6 "Normal Termination Date" means the Director attaining age 71.
1.1.7 "Termination of Service" means the Director's ceasing to be a member of the Company's Board of Directors for any
reason whatsoever.
Article 2
2.2 Election Changes
Article 3
Article 4
4.1.2 Payment of Benefit, _The Company shall pay the benefit to the Director in the
form elected by the Director on the Election Form.
Article 5
amounts they would have been paid to the Director had the Director survived.
Article 6
Article 7
Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Company shall not pay any benefit under this Agreement that is
attributable to the Company's matching contributions or the interest earned on such contributions:
7.2.1 Gross negligence or gross neglect of
duties;
7.2.2 Commission of a felony or of a gross
misdemeanor involving moral turpitude;
or:
7.2.3 Fraud,
disloyalty, dishonesty or willful violation of any law or significant Company policy committed in connection with the Director's service and resulting in an adverse financial effect on the Company.
Article 8
Article 9
The Company may amend or terminate this Agreement at any time prior to the Director's Termination of Service by written
notice to the Director. In no event shall this Agreement be terminated without payment to the Director of the Deferral Account balance attributable to the Director's deferrals and interest credited on such amounts.
Article 10
10.5 Applicable Law. The Agreement and all rights hereunder shall be governed by the laws of Ohio, except to the extent preempted by the laws of the United States of America.
DIRECTOR: |
COMPANY: | ||
The Ohio Valley Bank Company | |||
Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx
|
By: | |
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx
|
Title: | |
Chairman and CEO
|
THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY
EXHIBIT I
TO
DEFERRED FEE AGREEMENT
Deferral Election
Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx
I elect to defer compensation under my Deferred Fee Agreement with the Company, as follows:
Amount of Deferral
|
Frequency of Deferral
|
Duration
|
||||
____
|
I elect to defer __ of Annual Fees
|
____
|
Monthly
|
____
|
For _
|
Months
|
__X__
|
I elect to defer $10,000.00
|
__X__
|
Yearly
|
____
|
For _ _
|
Years
|
I understand that I may change the amount, frequency and duration of my deferrals by filing a new election form with the Company; provided, however,
that any subsequent election will not be effective until the calendar year following the year in which the new election is received by the Company.
Form of Benefit
I elect to receive benefits under the Agreement in the following form:
[Initial One]
Lump sum
Equal monthly installments for 240 months
I understand that I may not change the form of benefit elected, even if I later change the amount of my deferrals under the Agreement.
|
THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
THIS AMENDMENT executed on this 20th day of May, 2003, by and between THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY, located in Gallipolis, Ohio
(the "Company"), and XXXXXXX X. XXXXX (the "Director").
On December 1, 1996, the Company and the Director executed THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY DEFERRED FEE AGREEMENT (the
"Agreement").
The undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purpose of revising the Death Benefits provision. Therefore,
Section 5.1.1 of the Agreement shall he deleted in its entirety and replaced by the new Section 5.1.1 as follows:
5.1.1 Amount of Benefit. The benefit under this Section 5.1 is the Deferral Account balance at the Executive's death.
IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Director and the Company have agreed to this First Amendment.
DIRECTOR: |
COMPANY: | |||
|
The Ohio Valley Bank Company | |||
Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx
|
By:
|
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx
|
||
Title:
|
Chairman of the Board
|
THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is adopted this 29th day of March, 2018, by The Ohio Valley Bank
Company (the “Company”) and Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx (the “Director”).
The Company and the Director executed a certain Director Deferred Fee Agreement December 1, 1996 (as
amended, the “Agreement”). The Company and the Director now wish to amend the Agreement to comply with recent Department of Labor requirements regarding Claims and Review Procedures.
Now, therefore, the Company and the Director amend the Agreement as follows.
Article 8 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
ARTICLE 8
8.1 Claims Procedure. A person who believes that he or
she is being denied a benefit to which he or she is entitled hereunder (a “Claimant”) shall make a claim for such benefits as follows.
(a) Initiation – Written Claim. The Claimant initiates a claim by submitting to the
Company (referred to as the “Plan Administrator” in this Article 8) a written claim for the benefits. If such a claim relates to the contents of a notice received by the Claimant, the claim must be made within sixty (60) days after such notice was
received by the Claimant. All other claims must be made within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date on which the event that caused the claim to arise occurred. The claim must state with particularity the determination desired by the
Claimant.
(b) Timing of Plan Administrator Response. The Plan Administrator shall respond to such Claimant within forty-five (45) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that
special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional thirty (30) days by notifying the Claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45)
day period, that an additional period is required. The extension notice shall specifically explain the standards on which entitlement to a disability benefit is based, the unresolved issues that prevent a decision on the claim and the additional
information needed from the Claimant to resolve those issues, and the Claimant shall be afforded at least forty-five (45) days within which to provide the specified information.
(c) Notice of Decision. If the Plan Administrator denies all
or a part of the claim, the Plan Administrator shall notify the Claimant in writing of such denial in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood
by the Claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) the specific reasons for the denial; (ii) a reference to the specific provisions of this Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) a notice that the Claimant has a right to request a
review of the claim denial and an explanation of the Plan’s review procedures and the time limits applicable to such procedures; (iv) a statement of the Claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse
benefit determination on review, and a description of any time limit for bringing such an action; (v) for any Disability claim, a discussion of the decision, including an explanation of the basis for disagreeing with or not following: (A) the views
presented by the Claimant of health care professionals treating the Claimant and vocational professionals who evaluated the Claimant; (B) the views of medical or vocational experts whose advice was obtained on behalf of the Company in connection
with a Claimant’s adverse benefit determination, without regard to whether the advice was relied upon in making the benefit determination; or (C) a disability determination regarding the Claimant presented by the Claimant made by the Social
Security Administration (vi) for any Disability claim, the specific internal rules, guidelines, protocols, standards or other similar criteria relied upon in making the adverse determination or, alternatively, a statement that such rules,
guidelines, protocols, standards or other similar criteria do not exist; and (viii) for any Disability claim, a statement that the Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents,
records, and other information relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefits. Whether a document, record, or other information is relevant to a claim for benefits shall be determined by Department of Labor Regulation Section 2560.503-1(m)(8).
8.2 Review Procedure. If the Plan Administrator denies
all or a part of the claim, the Claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial as follows.
(a) Additional Evidence. Prior to the review of the denied
claim, the Claimant shall be given, free of charge, any new or additional evidence considered, relied upon, or generated by the Plan Administrator, or any new or additional rationale, as soon as possible and sufficiently in advance of the date on
which the notice of adverse benefit determination on review is required to be provided, to give the Claimant a reasonable opportunity to respond prior to that date.
(b) Initiation – Written Request. To initiate the review,
the Claimant, within sixty (60) days after receiving the Plan Administrator’s notice of denial, must file with the Plan Administrator a written request for review.
(c) Additional Submissions – Information Access. After such
request the Claimant may submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the Claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all
documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the Claimant’s claim for benefits.
(d) Considerations on Review. In considering the review, the
Plan Administrator shall consider all materials and information the Claimant submits relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. Additional considerations shall
be required in the case of a claim for Disability benefits. The claim shall be reviewed by an individual or committee who did not make the initial determination that is subject of the appeal and who is not a subordinate of the individual who made
the determination. Additionally, the review shall be made without deference to the initial adverse benefit determination. If the initial adverse benefit determination was based in whole or in part on a medical judgment, the Plan Administrator will
consult with a health care professional with appropriate training and experience in the field of medicine involving the medical judgment. The health care professional who is consulted on appeal will not be the same individual who was consulted
during the initial determination and will not be the subordinate of such individual. If the Plan Administrator obtained the advice of medical or vocational experts in making the initial adverse benefits determination (regardless of whether the
advice was relied upon), the Plan Administrator will identify such experts.
(d) Timing of Plan Administrator Response. The Plan
Administrator shall respond in writing to such Claimant within forty-five (45) days after receiving the request for review. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan
Administrator can extend the response period by an additional forty-five (45) days by notifying the Claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension
must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision.
(e) Notice of Decision. The Plan Administrator shall notify
the Claimant in writing of its decision on review. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) the
specific reasons for the denial; (ii) a reference to the specific provisions of this Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) a statement that the Claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and
copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the Claimant’s claim for benefits; (iv) a statement of the Claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a); (v) for
any Disability claim, a discussion of the decision, including an explanation of the basis for disagreeing with or not following: (A) the views presented by the Claimant of health care professionals treating the Claimant and vocational professionals
who evaluated the Claimant; (B) the views of medical or vocational experts whose advice was obtained on behalf of the Company in connection with a Claimant’s adverse benefit determination, without regard to whether the advice was relied upon in
making the benefit determination; or (C) a disability determination regarding the Claimant presented by the Claimant made by the Social Security Administration; and (vi) for any Disability claim, the specific internal rules, guidelines, protocols,
standards or other similar criteria relied upon in making the adverse determination or, alternatively, a statement that such rules, guidelines, protocols, standards or other similar criteria do not exist;.
8.3 Exhaustion of Remedies. The Claimant must follow these claims
review procedures and exhaust all administrative remedies before taking any further action with respect to a claim for benefits.
8.4 Failure of Plan to Follow Procedures. In the case of a claim for
Disability benefits, if the Plan Administrator fails to strictly adhere to all the requirements of this claims procedure with respect to a Disability claim, the Claimant is deemed to have exhausted the administrative remedies available under the
Plan, and shall be entitled to pursue any available remedies under ERISA Section 502(a) on the basis that the Plan Administrator has failed to provide a reasonable claims procedure that would yield a decision on the merits of the claim, except
where the violation was: (a) de minimis; (b) non-prejudicial; (c) attributable to good cause or matters beyond the Plan Administrator’s control; (d)
in the context of an ongoing good-faith exchange of information; and (e) not reflective of a pattern or practice of noncompliance. The Claimant may request a
written explanation of the violation from the Plan Administrator, and the Plan Administrator must provide such explanation within ten (10) days, including a specific description of its basis, if any, for asserting that the violation should not
cause the administrative remedies to be deemed exhausted. If a court rejects the Claimant’s request for immediate review on the basis that the Plan Administrator met the standards for the exception, the claim shall be considered as re-filed on
appeal upon the Plan Administrator’s receipt of the decision of the court. Within a reasonable time after the receipt of the decision, the Plan Administrator shall provide the claimant with notice of the resubmission.
Both the Company
and the Director agree that this amendment shall not be considered a “material modification” of the Agreement for purposes of Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A. Consequently, the Agreement shall continue to be “grandfathered” such that Code Section 409A does not apply to this Agreement.
Director
|
Company:
|
|
|
|
|
Xxxxxxx Xxxxx
|
By: |
|
Its: |