RESOLUTION AGREEMENTResolution Agreement • February 26th, 2018
Contract Type FiledFebruary 26th, 2018The Falmouth Public Schools (District) has voluntarily entered into this agreement to resolve the allegations in the above-referenced complaint. The District assures that it will take the following actions and will meet its obligation to comply with the requirements of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504) and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Title II) or any other law enforced by OCR.
RESOLUTION AGREEMENTResolution Agreement • December 19th, 2017
Contract Type FiledDecember 19th, 2017The Stonington Board of Education (District) has voluntarily entered into this agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to resolve the allegations in the above-referenced complaint.
RESOLUTION AGREEMENTResolution Agreement • December 19th, 2017
Contract Type FiledDecember 19th, 2017The Madison Board of Education (District) has voluntarily entered into this agreement (Agreement) with the U. S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to resolve the allegations in the above-referenced complaint.
Resolution Agreement Barnstable Public Schools OCR Case No. 01-17-1103Resolution Agreement • November 3rd, 2017
Contract Type FiledNovember 3rd, 2017Barnstable Public Schools (the District) voluntarily submits this agreement to resolve the above-referenced complaint and to ensure compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Resolution Agreement Lynn Public Schools OCR Case No. 01-17-1288Resolution Agreement • November 3rd, 2017
Contract Type FiledNovember 3rd, 2017The U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), initiated an investigation into allegations that the Lynn Public Schools (District) violated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504) and its implementing regulation at 34 C.F.R. Part 104, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Title II) and its implementing regulation at 28 C.F.R. Part 35. Specifically, the Complainant alleged that the District’s website contained barriers to access for people with disabilities, thereby denying them an equal opportunity to participate in the District’s programs, services, and activities.