Common Contracts
1 similar ________________________________________________________________________ contracts
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURIAugust 19th, 2002
The trustee does not argue that her notice of hearing on her motion for judgment on the pleadings was timely under Rule 44.01. Instead, she attempts to justify her untimeliness. She explains that, because the Treasurer set her motion to vacate for hearing on October 18, 2001, she noticed her motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed on October 12, 2001, for the previously established date. But the facts, put in context, establish the impropriety of the notice given by the trustee.
