Termination AgreementsTermination Agreements • October 30th, 2017
Contract Type FiledOctober 30th, 2017Note: The California Supreme Court held in Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School District that, under specified circumstances, school authorities could be held liable for physical harm to a student molested by a former employee when they recommended the employee to another district. In light of this decision, districts should carefully consider any clause in a termination agreement that limits the district's ability to provide such information to prospective employers. In general, districts should not enter into termination agreements without legal advice.
Termination AgreementsTermination Agreements • October 30th, 2017
Contract Type FiledOctober 30th, 2017Note: The California Supreme Court held in Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School District that, under specified circumstances, school authorities could be held liable for physical harm to a student molested by a former employee when they recommended the employee to another district. In light of this decision, districts should carefully consider any clause in a termination agreement that limits the district's ability to provide such information to prospective employers. In general, districts should not enter into termination agreements without legal advice.
Termination AgreementsTermination Agreements • October 30th, 2017
Contract Type FiledOctober 30th, 2017Note: The California Supreme Court held in Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School District that, under specified circumstances, school authorities could be held liable for physical harm to a student molested by a former employee when they recommended the employee to another district. In light of this decision, districts should carefully consider any clause in a termination agreement that limits the district's ability to provide such information to prospective employers. In general, districts should not enter into termination agreements without legal advice.