Common Contracts
4 similar Ontology Alignment Agreement contracts
Reaching agreement over ontology alignmentsOntology Alignment Agreement • October 16th, 2006
We propose an approach for supporting the creation and exchange of different ar- guments, that support or reject possible correspondences. Each agent can decide, according to its preferences, whether to accept or refuse a candidate correspon- dence. The proposed framework considers arguments and propositions that are specific to the matching task and are based on the ontology semantics. This ar- gumentation framework relies on a formal argument manipulation schema and on an encoding of the agents’ preferences between particular kinds of arguments. Whilst the former does not vary between agents, the latter depends on the inter- ests of each agent. Thus, this approach distinguishes clearly between alignment rationales which are valid for all agents and those specific to a particular agent.
Reaching Agreement over Ontology AlignmentsOntology Alignment Agreement • September 12th, 2006
We propose an approach for supporting the creation and exchange of differ- ent arguments, that support or reject possible correspondences. Each agent can decide, according to its preferences, whether to accept or refuse a candidate cor- respondence. The proposed framework considers arguments and propositions that are specific to the matching task and are based on the ontology semantics. This argumentation framework relies on a formal argument manipulation schema and on an encoding of the agents’ preferences between particular kinds of arguments. Whilst the former does not vary between agents, the latter depends on the inter- ests of each agent. Thus, this approach distinguishes clearly between alignment rationales which are valid for all agents and those specific to a particular agent.
Reaching agreement over ontology alignmentsOntology Alignment Agreement • August 28th, 2006
We propose an approach for supporting the creation and exchange of different ar- guments, that support or reject possible correspondences. Each agent can decide, according to its preferences, whether to accept or refuse a candidate correspon- dence. The proposed framework considers arguments and propositions that are specific to the matching task and are based on the ontology semantics. This ar- gumentation framework relies on a formal argument manipulation schema and on an encoding of the agents’ preferences between particular kinds of arguments. Whilst the former does not vary between agents, the latter depends on the inter- ests of each agent. Thus, this approach distinguishes clearly between alignment rationales which are valid for all agents and those specific to a particular agent.
Reaching agreement over ontology alignmentsOntology Alignment Agreement • August 25th, 2006
We propose an approach for supporting the creation and exchange of different ar- guments, that support or reject possible correspondences. Each agent can decide, according to its preferences, whether to accept or refuse a candidate correspon- dence. The proposed framework considers arguments and propositions that are specific to the matching task and are based on the ontology semantics. This ar- gumentation framework relies on a formal argument manipulation schema and on an encoding of the agents’ preferences between particular kinds of arguments. Whilst the former does not vary between agents, the latter depends on the inter- ests of each agent. Thus, this approach distinguishes clearly between alignment rationales which are valid for all agents and those specific to a particular agent.
